Minutes of the 39th Meeting of the Monitoring Committee Held on 08-12-2010 in the Main Conference Hall of CMDA
The Monitoring Committee of the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority issued these minutes for its meeting held on 8 December 2010. The minutes record case-specific decisions on evidence that unauthorised or deviated buildings were completed before 28 February 1999, as well as conditions, requests for clarification and one deferred regularisation matter.
What the minutes cover
The Minutes of the 39th Meeting of the Monitoring Committee of the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority record decisions on individual regularisation applications. The main issue considered was whether particular unauthorised or deviated buildings had been completed before 28 February 1999. The committee assessed documents such as property tax records, water and sewerage receipts, electricity records, sale deeds, loan records, demolition notices and inspection reports.
These are property-specific findings. They do not announce a general approval for all unauthorised construction.
Who may be affected
The decisions directly concern owners and applicants associated with the listed properties in Gill Nagar, Vadapalani, Kodambakkam, T. Nagar, Purasawalkam, Velachery, Adyar and Mylapore. Buyers, lenders and property professionals examining one of these properties may need to check the relevant agenda item, the evidence accepted and any condition or unresolved discrepancy.
Key decisions
- Flats B1 and B2 at Door No. 92, Central School Road, Gill Nagar, were accepted as completed before 28 February 1999, based on tax, water and inspection records.
- Flat B5 at Door No. 23, Palayakaran Cross Street, Kodambakkam, was accepted as completed before the cut-off date. The committee relied on a sale deed, a house building loan record, a property name transfer letter and an inspection report.
- Flat C2 at Door No. 72/3, Jawarlal Nehru 100' Road, Vadapalani, was accepted subject to clarification of conflicting door numbers.
- The commercial and industrial building at Door No. 36, Vaidyarama Iyer Street, T. Nagar, was accepted as completed before the cut-off date, subject to removal of additional temporary structures built later.
- The Waddels Road play school, creche and dwelling unit matter was deferred for legal opinion concerning a neighbour's court case and the applicant's willingness to pay a regularisation fee.
- The residential building at Rajalakshmi Nagar, Velachery, was accepted as completed before the cut-off date. Chennai Corporation was asked to note the large difference between the assessed tax area and the area in the regularisation plan.
- Three individual flats in Parameswari Nagar, Adyar, were accepted as completed before the cut-off date. One applicant was separately asked to clarify a door number difference.
- The committee discussed treating St. Isabel's Hospital as an institutional development, but the supplied text does not record a final decision on that request.
What buyers should check
A finding about the completion date should be read together with any stated condition, address discrepancy, area difference or pending legal issue. The minutes record evidence decisions, but the supplied text does not expressly state that every listed property received final regularisation approval.
This summary is generated from the source document to help you find what is relevant. The PDF above is authoritative. For advice on your own property, use LandLens One or speak to a qualified professional.
Common questions
Do these minutes regularise every unauthorised building listed?
No. The Monitoring Committee made individual findings about completion dates and evidence. One matter was deferred, and some findings were subject to conditions or clarification.
What evidence did the committee accept to show construction before 28 February 1999?
Depending on the property, the committee accepted property tax records, water and sewerage receipts, electricity records, sale deeds, loan records and demolition notices. Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority inspection reports were also treated as supporting evidence.
Was the T. Nagar commercial and industrial building accepted without conditions?
No. The building at Door No. 36, Vaidyarama Iyer Street, was accepted as completed before 28 February 1999, subject to removal of additional temporary structures put up after that date.
Did the committee decide the regularisation fee category for St. Isabel's Hospital?
The committee discussed the request to treat St. Isabel's Hospital as an institutional development. The supplied text does not contain a final resolution on that request.
