Annexure to the Minutes of the MC Meeting held on 03.02.2007, for Agenda Item No. 5.5
The annexure issued with the Minutes of the MC Meeting held on 3 February 2007 records resolutions for 30 named applicants and properties under Agenda Item Number 5.5. It directs demolition notices, restoration notices with applicable fire safety measures, requests for evidence or approved plans, and deferral of two cases.
What the document covers
The annexure to the Minutes of the MC Meeting held on 3 February 2007 lists property related resolutions for 30 applicants. Each entry identifies an applicant, registration number, file number, address, locality, postcode and village, followed by the action resolved for that case.
The annexure is relevant to the named applicants, owners or occupiers of the listed properties. A buyer or professional examining one of these properties should compare the applicant name, door number, street, locality, village and file number with the property records.
Main resolutions
The resolutions include:
- Demolition notices for four cases, concerning Jacob M.A. in Gopalapuram, N. Gopal in Anna Nagar, Kumar G.V. in Park Town and Dr. Muthu M.G. in Royapuram.
- Notices in 19 cases requiring the building to be restored according to the approved plan and requiring applicable fire safety measures.
- Notices in three cases requiring restoration according to a Government order and applicable fire safety measures. These concern Child Trust Hospital, Madras Stock Exchange Limited, and Sarojini A. and others.
- Deferral of the Marina Hotels case while the approved plan is examined with reference to a Government order.
- Deferral of the Data Software Research case, without a further reason recorded in the annexure.
Cases requiring further records or inspection
The resolution for Kaneez Fathima calls for additional evidence that construction was completed before 28 February 1999. It also seeks a declaration that no further construction was made, allows evidence to be called for from TNEB and CMWSSB, and proposes a joint inspection by CMDA and DF&RS to confirm that there is no additional construction above the fifth floor.
The resolution for Jeyachandran requires the applicant to produce the original approved plan. It also states that the Commissioner, Chennai Corporation will check the approved plan against Corporation records.
Practical effect
The annexure records decisions to issue notices or undertake further examination. It does not reproduce the notices themselves or set out the later outcome of any case. Anyone dealing with a listed property may therefore need to identify the relevant registration and file numbers and check whether the required restoration, demolition, evidence, plan verification or inspection was subsequently completed.
This summary is generated from the source document to help you find what is relevant. The PDF above is authoritative. For advice on your own property, use LandLens One or speak to a qualified professional.
Common questions
Does every property in the annexure face demolition?
No. Four entries direct demolition notices. Most other entries direct restoration according to an approved plan or Government order, together with applicable fire safety measures.
Were any cases deferred?
Yes. The Marina Hotels case was deferred for examination of the approved plan with reference to a Government order, and the Data Software Research case was also deferred.
Does the annexure confirm that the required work was completed?
No. The annexure records resolutions to issue notices, request records, inspect properties or defer cases. It does not state the later outcome.
How can I check whether a listed case concerns my property?
Compare the applicant name, door number, street, locality, village, registration number and file number in the annexure with the property's records.
