Annexure to the Minutes of the MC Meeting held on 23.03.2007, for Agenda Item No. 8.3
The Annexure to the Minutes of the MC Meeting held on 23 March 2007, for Agenda Item Number 8.3, was issued by the committee identified in the document only as MC and records resolutions on ten building regularisation applications. Most applicants were asked for evidence that construction was completed before 28 February 1999, one application was found regularisable subject to conditions, and one was rejected with a direction to restore the building to the approved plan. The document does not name a department or provide a government order number.
What the document covers
The Annexure to the Minutes of the MC Meeting held on 23 March 2007 records applicant-specific resolutions under Agenda Item Number 8.3. It lists each applicant's registration number, file number, name and property details, followed by the committee's resolution.
The annexure does not grant a general approval affecting all properties. Its entries relate only to the ten applications and properties listed.
Resolutions recorded
The committee recorded the following outcomes:
- Shenoy Nagar Benefit Fund Limited, Khivraj Motors Limited, Ambika Resorts and Industries, Sooriya Hospitals, Vijaya Hospital, D. Murugaselvam, and C. Kanthilal and Others were to receive notices calling for additional evidence that construction had been completed before 28 February 1999.
- Kanagasabapathy P. was to receive a notice seeking both evidence that construction had been completed before 28 February 1999 and the approved plan.
- M/s. JL Builders Private Limited, registration number 5005 and file number C6 / 21278 / 1999, was recorded as regularisable subject to obtaining a certificate from DF&RS for alternative fire safety measures and collection of the Reg.1999 Scheme Fee.
- Annamalai L.P.L.P.A.N., registration number 3751 and file number C6 / 18769 / 99, was rejected. The resolution directed that a notice be issued to restore the property to the approved plan.
Who may be affected
The resolutions directly concern the named applicants and the properties identified by door number, street, locality, village and file number. Owners, buyers or professionals checking one of these properties should compare the applicant name, registration number and file number, because similar locality names alone may not identify the correct case.
For the applications requiring additional evidence, the annexure does not record final regularisation. For M/s. JL Builders Private Limited, the finding is expressly conditional on the fire safety certificate and fee collection. For the Mylapore property associated with Annamalai L.P.L.P.A.N., the recorded outcome is rejection and restoration to the approved plan.
This summary is generated from the source document to help you find what is relevant. The PDF above is authoritative. For advice on your own property, use LandLens One or speak to a qualified professional.
Common questions
Does this document regularise every property listed?
No. Most applicants were asked to provide further evidence, one application was described as regularisable subject to conditions, and one was rejected.
What construction date must most applicants prove?
The notices call for evidence that construction was completed before 28 February 1999.
What conditions apply to the JL Builders Private Limited application?
The application was recorded as regularisable subject to obtaining a certificate from DF&RS for alternative fire safety measures and collection of the Reg.1999 Scheme Fee.
What happened to the Annamalai L.P.L.P.A.N. application in Mylapore?
The application was rejected, and the resolution called for a notice directing restoration to the approved plan.
