Complaint before the TN RERA Authority
C.No.120/2024 (Arguments)
Parties, as the latest list prints them
- Complainant
- 1.RajaniSudarshan 2.M.G.RamachandranIA.99
- Respondent
- Shriprop Properties Private Limited
Hearings, newest first
-
16 Nov 2026 Cause list, item 26
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M (Arguments).
-
28 Oct 2026 Case diary, item 32
C.No.120/2024
Complainants party in person present. Counsel for Respondent present and already filed an Affidavit in respect of car parking issues as directed by this Authority during last hearing. While perusing the affidavit, the Authority observed that again the Respondent has not taken the instructions given during last two hearings and the affidavit furnished now does not serve the purpose. Therefore, the Authority imposes a penalty of Rs.50,000/- with a direction to file an Affidavit detailing the car parks approved as per plan approved by the planning authority versus the actual car parking executed namely reserved car parks (covered and open car parks) and visitors car parks by allottee-wise including the complainants within one week before the Registry along with the above penalty amount. Any delay in filing the Affidavit within one week, an amount of Rs.1 lakh will be imposed. Posted to 16.11.2026 for compliance by the Respondent.
Next: 16 Nov 2026, for compliance by the Respondent
-
28 Oct 2026 Cause list, item 32
Listed for hearing (Arguments).
-
14 Oct 2026 Case diary, item 22
C.No.120/2024
Complainants party in person present. Representing counsel for Respondent present and filed Affidavit in respect of car parking issues as directed by this Authority during last hearing. The counsel for the Respondent sought time for arguments. The Authority perused the Affidavit filed by the Respondent and observed that the Affidavit does not meet the instructions given during last hearing. Therefore, the Authority directs the Respondent to file a detailed Affidavit stating the entire car parking arrangements in accordance with approved plan i.e. in terms of reserved car park (open and covered) and visitors car parks within one week before the Registry and serve copy to the Complainants. Any failure to file the Affidavit within one week, a penalty of Rs.25,000/- will be imposed. Posted to 28.10.2026.
Next: 28 Oct 2026
-
14 Oct 2026 Cause list, item 22
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
23 Sep 2026 Case diary, item 11
C.No.120/2024
Counsel for Complainants present and filed addition written arguments by serving copy to the counsel for the Respondent. Counsel for Respondent present and sought time to file Affidavit in respect of car parking issues as directed by this Authority during last hearing. The Respondent is directed to file the Affidavit detailing the car park arrangements made with reference to the approved plan within two weeks before the Registry, failing which penalty will be imposed. Posted to 14.10.2026 for further arguments.
Next: 14 Oct 2026, for further arguments
-
23 Sep 2026 Cause list, item 11
Listed for hearing (Arguments).
-
10 Aug 2026 Case diary, item 19
C.No.120/2024
Counsel for Complainants present Counsel for Respondent present. The counsel for the Complainants argued the matter and submitted that as per the approved plan the Respondent has to provide perpendicular car parks, whereas the Respondent provided parallel car parking. Also the Respondent stated in the affidavit filed before this Authority that they have provided 104 car parks which is incorrect, there is only 72 car parks available in phase-1 apartment complex. The complainant further submitted that the open car parking space does not include the exclusive reserved car parking space as per Rule 9(4) read with Rule 2(k) and Section 2(n). Also no space is provided to use the EV charging port. As per approved plan there is a shortage in driveway, whereas the findings of inspection report does not say with reference to the approved plan. The counsel for the Respondent submitted that they have provided parallel car parking instead of perpendiculare parking with a view to get more space for providing visitors car parking. Regarding provision of 104 car parking, the Respondent submitted that they have provided 104 car parking in both the phase-1 & phase-2. The Authority heard both the Complainants and the Respondent. As the inspection report does say with reference to the approved plan, the Authority directs the Respondent to file an Affidavit stating that in the open space in Phase-1 what is the number of reserved car parks provided as against the approved plan, number of open car parks and visitors car parks provided and whether any reserved car parks are sold by the Promoter. The shortcomings, if any, may be mentioned in the Affidavit. Posted to 23.09.2026 for further arguments.
Next: 23 Sep 2026, for further arguments
-
10 Aug 2026 Cause list, item 19
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
3 Aug 2026 Case diary, item 14
C.No.120/2024
Counsel for Complainants present and filed written arguments and also served copy to the counsel for the Respondent. Counsel for Respondent present and sought time for arguments. At the request of the Respondent, posted to 10.08.2026 for arguments finally.
Next: 10 Aug 2026, for arguments finally
-
3 Aug 2026 Cause list, item 14
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
1 Jul 2026 Case diary, item 20
C.No.120/2024
The counsel for the Complainants present and sought time for arguments. The counsel for the Respondent present and submitted that they have no objection to the inspection report submitted by the independent engineer and to that effect the Respondent undertook to file a memo. Posted to 03.08.2026 for arguments finally.
Next: 3 Aug 2026, for arguments finally
-
1 Jul 2026 Cause list, item 20
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
27 Apr 2026 Case diary, item 6
C.No.120/2024
The counsel for the Complainants present and submitted that the copy of the inspection report has been received today only and they want to offer their remarks. The counsel for the Respondent present. Both the parties are at liberty to file their comments, if any, on the inspection report of the independent engineer within two weeks from today before the Registry by serving copy with each other. Posted to 01.07.2026 for arguments.
Next: 1 Jul 2026, for arguments
-
27 Apr 2026 Cause list, item 6
-
23 Feb 2026 Case diary, item 6
C.No.120/2024
The counsel for the Complainants present. The counsel for the Respondent present and sought time to argue the matter. The Respondent has already filed the Counter with cost paid Memo in the Registry. The counsel for the Complainants submitted that they have filed an IA No.99/2025 praying for appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to inspect the project site with respect to parking issue. The counsel for the Respondent submitted that they have no objection provided the cost is borne by the Complainant. Accordingly the IA No.99 /2025 is allowed. This Authority directs the Registry to appoint an independent engineer from the panel of engineers for inspection of the project site with respect to parking issue. The fee for the independent engineer shall be paid by the complainant at Rs.15,000/- being 50% cost of Rs.30,000/- with the Registry within two weeks. On receipt of fee from the complainant, the Registry shall appoint an independent engineer to inspect the project site with reference to parking issue. The independent engineer shall inspect the site and submit a report within one month from the date of appointment order. The inspection should be done with prior intimation to both the parties, so that the parties can be present at the site during inspection by the independent engineer. The matter is posted to 27.04.2026 for filing inspection report.
Next: 27 Apr 2026, for filing inspection report
-
23 Feb 2026 Cause list, item 6
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
7 Jan 2026 Case diary, item 26
C.No.120/2024
The Counsel for the Complainants present. The Counsel for the Respondent present. During last hearing, the Authority directed the Respondent to file Counter to the IA filed by the Complainants, but the Respondent failed to file Counter. Therefore, the Respondent is directed to file Counter in IA within two weeks from today with cost of Rs.5,000/- payable to CM Relief fund and serve copy to the Complainants. Posted to 23.02.2026 for arguments in IA.
Next: 23 Feb 2026, for arguments in IA
-
7 Jan 2026 Cause list, item 26
-
19 Nov 2025 Case diary, item 7
C.No.120/2024
The Counsel for the Complainants present. The Counsel for the Respondent present. The Counsel for the Complainants submitted that they would like to file a Memo requesting for appointment of an Expert to inspect the project site with respect to car parking issues and sought time to file the same The Complainants are permitted to file an IA for appointment of an Expert within two weeks from today in the Registry with copy served to the Respondent by RPAD. The Respondent is directed to file Counter to the IA. Posted to 07.01.2026 for arguments in IA.
Next: 7 Jan 2026, for arguments in IA
-
19 Nov 2025 Cause list, item 7
-
22 Oct 2025 Case diary, item 6
C.No.120/2024
The Counsel for the Complainants present. The Counsel for the Respondent present. The Authority during last hearing directed the Respondent to file an Affidavit furnishing the details regarding the car park issues which has been filed by the Respondent in the Registry and also served copy to the Complainants. The Counsel for the Complainants submitted that he has to get instruction from his client and sought adjournment. The case is adjourned to 19.11.2025
Next: 19 Nov 2025
-
22 Oct 2025 Cause list, item 6
-
10 Sep 2025 Case diary, item 23
C.No.120/2024
The Counsel for the Complainants present. The Counsel for the Respondent present. During last hearing the Authority directed the Respondent to file an Affidavit for 3 set of questions regarding car parking issues in this project. The Counsel for the Respondent furnished an Affidavit in response to the 3 set of questions which the Authority felt that the response is deprived of the details and therefore, the Authority directs the Respondent to fill an Affidavit within 2 weeks in the Registry furnishing the details of No. of car parks approved by CMDA including the visitors car parks and No. of car parks provided allottee-wise by the Respondent. Posted to 22.10.2025.
Next: 22 Oct 2025
-
10 Sep 2025 Cause list, item 23
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
16 Jul 2025 Case diary, item 33
C.No.120/2024
The Counsel for the Complainants present. The Counsel for the Respondent present. The Counsel for the Complainants submitted that the Respondent is encumbering the open parking spaces being part of common areas marked as visitors’ parking and allocating open parking space to individual flat owners. Therefore, the Complainants prayed the Authority to restrain the Respondent from not to encumber the open parking spaces and restrain to allocate open parking spaces to individual flat owners and not to allot fresh open car parking spaces. The Authority directed the Respondent to file an Affidavit before the Registry detailing (i) whether the car park provided in the project are in accordance with the plan approved by CMDA; (ii) whether the car parking provided for visitors in the open area are strictly reserved for visitors or allotted to any individual allottees and (iii) whether the total number of car parking provided in the project tallies with overall car parks allotted as well as individual apartment-wise. Posted to 10.09.2025
Next: 10 Sep 2025
-
16 Jul 2025 Cause list, item 33
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
4 Jun 2025 Case diary, item 34
C.No.120/2024
The Counsel for the Complainants present. The Counsel for the Respondent present. As the Counsel for the Complainants made no objection in the IA, the Authority allowed the IA No.37/2025 filed by the Respondent to receive additional documents. Posted to 16.07.2025 for arguments in the main complaint.
Next: 16 Jul 2025, for arguments in the main complaint
-
4 Jun 2025 Cause list, item 34
Listed for hearing (Arguments).
-
9 Apr 2025 Case diary, item 25
C.No.120/2024
The Complainants present. The Counsel for the Respondent present and filed an IA along with additional documents ny serving copy to the Counsel for Complainants. The Registry is directed to number the IA, if it is in order. The Complainants shall file their response on the IA filed by the Respondent. Posted to 04.06.2025.
Next: 4 Jun 2025
-
9 Apr 2025 Cause list, item 25
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
19 Feb 2025 Case diary, item 25
C.No.120/2024
The Complainants present. The Counsel for the Respondent present and wants to file additional documents which they shall file by serving copy to the Complainants through RPAD and file proof of service with the Authority. Posted to 09.04.2025 for arguments finally.
Next: 9 Apr 2025, for arguments finally
-
19 Feb 2025 Cause list, item 25
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M (Arguments).
-
8 Jan 2025 Case diary, item 25
C.No.120/2024
The Complainants part in person present. The Counsel for the Respondent present. As the Counsel for the Complainant has sent an e-mail seeking adjournment of this case, posted to 19.02.2025 for arguments finally.
Next: 19 Feb 2025, for arguments finally
-
8 Jan 2025 Cause list, item 26
Listed for hearing (Arguments).
-
13 Nov 2024 Case diary, item 11
C.No.120/2024
The Counsel for Complainants present. For Respondent, the Counsel M/s.Leela & Co. present and filed vakalat and Counter with copy served on the counsel for the complainants. Posted to 08.01.2025 for arguments.
Next: 8 Jan 2025, for arguments
-
13 Nov 2024 Cause list, item 11
-
11 Sep 2024 Case diary, item 4
120/2024
The Counsel for Complainants present. For Respondent, the Counsel M/s.Leela & Co. present and undertook to file vakalat along with Counter. In the meantime, the complainants Counsel is directed to serve copy of the Complaint along with typed set documents if any, to the Respondent on or before 25.09.2024. Posted to 13.11.2024 for filing vakalat and Counter.
Next: 13 Nov 2024, for filing vakalat and Counter
-
11 Sep 2024 Cause list, item 4
Read from the cause lists and case diaries TN RERA publishes. A listing is a dispute being heard, not a finding; the final order, once passed, is the decision.
Ask the records, or walk the map.
LandLens One answers from Tamil Nadu land law itself, cited to the page, then acts on the registers. One Map lights them up on the parcel. Your history stays in one place across both.
YOU APPROVE ANY SPEND
*Some tools are free of charge, but you need a credit balance to use LandLens One and One Map chat.
