Complaint before the TN RERA Authority
C.No.014/2024
Parties, as the latest list prints them
- Complainant
- P.S.Saravanan
- Respondent
- 1) M/s. Olympia Tech Park (Chennai) Pvt. Ltd. 2) The Secretary Olympia Opaline Flat Owners Association
Hearings, newest first
-
13 Aug 2025 Case diary, item 18
Both the Counsels for Complainant and the Counsel for the Respondent-1 present. The Counsel for the Respondent-1 filed Memo along with typed set document by serving copy to the Counsel for the Complainant. The Counsel for the Complainant wants to file objection which they shall file it before Registry within one week by serving copy to the Respondent. The Authority heard both the parties and reserved for orders.
-
13 Aug 2025 Cause list, item 18
-
23 Jul 2025 Case diary, item 25
014/2024
Both the Counsels for Complainant and the Counsel for the Respondent-1 present. The Authority already heard both the parties and reserved for orders. Now that the Authority suo moto re-opened the case for clarification. When the Authority enquired the Counsel for the Respondent whether the Completion Certificate for this project has been obtained or not, the Counsel for the Respondent submitted that he has to get instruction from his client and sought adjournment. Posted to 13.08.2025.
Next: 13 Aug 2025
-
23 Jul 2025 Cause list, item 25
-
20 Nov 2024 Case diary, item 38
014/2024
The Counsel for Complainant present and filed Memo for filing additional documents with copy served on the counsel for Respondent. The Counsel for 1st Respondent present and represented that on earlier occasion he made arguments partly whereas in the day order dated 09.10.2024 it is mentioned that the Respondent sought time to make arguments which should be corrected. Therefore, the Authority directed the Registry to correct the day order dated 09.10.2024 to read as “the Counsel for Respondent-1 argued partly and sought time for further arguments”. Both the Counsels made detailed arguments. The Authority heard both the parties and reserved for orders.
-
20 Nov 2024 Cause list, item 38
-
9 Oct 2024 Case diary, item 32
014/2024
The Counsel for Complainant present The Counsel for 1st Respondent present. The 2nd Respondent called absent The Counsel for Respondent-1 sought time for arguments. Both the parties made detailed arguments. The written submission of arguments already filed by both the parties. Posted to 20.11.2024 for further arguments.
Next: 20 Nov 2024, for further arguments
-
9 Oct 2024 Cause list, item 32
-
11 Sep 2024 Case diary, item 24
014/2024
The Counsel for Complainant present Representing Counsel for 1st Respondent present. The 2nd Respondent absent The Counsel for Respondent-1 sought time for arguments. At the request of the Counsel for Respondent-1, posted to 09.10.2024 for arguments finally.
Next: 9 Oct 2024, for arguments finally
-
11 Sep 2024 Cause list, item 23
-
23 Aug 2024 Case diary, item 41
14/2024
The Counsel for Complainant present The Counsel for 1st Respondent present. The Counsel for 2nd Respondent present The parties filed written submission of arguments. Posted to 11.09.2024 for arguments. The parties shall exchange their written arguments before next hearing.
Next: 11 Sep 2024, for arguments
-
23 Aug 2024 Cause list, item 51
-
14 Aug 2024 Cause list, item 51
14/2024 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing (Arguments).
Next: 23 Aug 2024, reposted, as the list's notice says
Notice on this listOn administrative grounds the below mentioned complaints posted on 14-08-2024 are reposted to 23.08.2024
-
19 Jun 2024 Case diary, item 21
14/2024
The Counsel for the Complainant present The Counsel for the Respondent-1 present and filed Counter with cost paid to the Complainant which is recorded. Respndent-2 absent. The IA filed by the 1st Respondent to set aside ex-parte order is recorded. Posted to 14.08.2024 for arguments. The rival parties are directed to exchange the written submission of arguments before 31.07.2024 so as to complete the oral submissions.
Next: 14 Aug 2024, for arguments
-
19 Jun 2024 Cause list, item 22
-
5 Jun 2024 Case diary, item 14
014/2024
The Counsel for the Complainant present The Counsel for the Respondent-2 present and filed Counter which is recorded. The Counsel M/s. Jeevan Hari appeared for 1st Respondent and prayed for filing IA along with vakalat. Posted to 19.06.2024 for filing vakalat, IA along with Counter at cost Rs.2,500/- to be paid to the Complainant on or before 19.06.2024.
Next: 19 Jun 2024, for filing vakalat, IA along with Counter at cost Rs
-
4 Apr 2024 Case diary, item 23
014/2024
The Counsel for the Complainant present The Counsel M/s. V.G.Suresh Kumar for the Respondent-2 present and already filed vakalat. Notice to the 1st Respondent served but remained absent and hence treated as ex-parte. Posted to 05.06.2024 for Counter by the Respondent-2.
Next: 5 Jun 2024, for Counter by the Respondent-2
Read from the cause lists and case diaries TN RERA publishes. A listing is a dispute being heard, not a finding; the final order, once passed, is the decision.
Ask the records, or walk the map.
LandLens One answers from Tamil Nadu land law itself, cited to the page, then acts on the registers. One Map lights them up on the parcel. Your history stays in one place across both.
YOU APPROVE ANY SPEND
*Some tools are free of charge, but you need a credit balance to use LandLens One and One Map chat.
