Complaint before the TN RERA Authority
C.No.14/2026 (Arguments)
Parties, as the latest list prints them
- Complainant
- 1) K. Arangannal 2) A. Arasi
- Respondent
- Dugar Housing Ltd.
Hearings, newest first
-
16 Nov 2026 Cause list, item 20
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M (Arguments).
-
30 Sep 2026 Case diary, item 20
C.No.014/2026
Counsel for Complainants present Counsel for Respondent present and submitted that this complaint is not maintainable and raises res judicata since the very same prayers sought and adjudicated in C.No.38/2023 and the interest term was already fixed by this Authority and the Respondent claims the delay due to force majeure events. The compensation for the genuine delay was already paid to the Complainants. Further the counsel for the Respondent stated that the Complainants themselves have defaulted on payments and still there are principal amount dues with interest for which reminders were also sent to the Complainants. The counsel for the Complainants submitted that the sale deed has not been executed even after payment of more than 85% of sale consideration and possession also has not been handed over. The counsel for the Complainant further stated that res judicata is not applied to this present complaint; since in the earlier order, the Authority has not adjudicated the relief prayed in C.No.38/2023 hence res judicata is not applied to the present complaint and submitted that they are ready to pay the remaining sale consideration. As far as the interest is concerned, there is a disputed portion in the calculation of interest for the belated payment. Therefore, the Complainant is directed to file a calculation sheet giving the exact number of days which the complainants attribute the delay on the part of the Respondent on or before next hearing. Posted to 16.11.2026
Next: 16 Nov 2026
-
30 Sep 2026 Cause list, item 20
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
31 Aug 2026 Case diary, item 9
C.No.014/2026
Counsel for Complainants present Counsel for Respondent present and filed AOS for service of copy of Counter to the Complainants and sought time for arguments. The counsel for the Complainants argued the matter and submitted that the sale deed has not been executed even after payment of 85% of sale consideration and possession also has not been handed over, whereas, as per construction agreement the Respondent shall execute the sale deed after payment of 75% of the total sale consideration. The counsel for the Complainant further stated that the environmental clearance and completion certificate for this project was issued in 2018 and 2019 respectively which is much after the RERA Act, 2016 came into force, and therefore, this project is very much an ongoing project and has to be registered with TNRERA. Also there was a direction to the Respondent by this Authority vide its order dated 30.10.2023 in C.Nos.22 & 38 of 2023 to register this project with TNRERA. There are incomplete amenities which the Respondent has also admitted in their counter. The Authority asked the counsel for the Complainants to state specifically which are the amenities pending now in the project. The counsel for the Complainants stated that the STP is not completed, Fire License and Lift License not obtained. As having paid 85% of the sale consideration, the counsel for Complainants prayed for a direction to Respondent to execute the sale deed and they are ready to pay the balance sale consideration. Posted to 30.09.2026 for arguments by Respondent.
Next: 30 Sep 2026, for arguments by Respondent
-
31 Aug 2026 Cause list, item 9
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
27 Jul 2026 Case diary, item 6
C.No.014/2026
Counsel for Complainants present and submitted that copy of counter has not been served to them. Counsel for Respondent present and submitted that the counter has already been served by post. However, undertook to serve copy of counter to the Complainants. Respondent shall serve copy of counter within two weeks to the Complainants. For arguments posted to 31.08.2026
Next: 31 Aug 2026, for arguments
-
27 Jul 2026 Cause list, item 6
-
17 Jun 2026 Case diary, item 6
C.No.014/2026
The counsel for the Complainants present. The counsel for the Respondent present and again sought time to file vakalat and Counter on behalf of the Respondent. During the hearing on 15.04.2026, the Authority at the counsel of the Respondent directed to file vakalat and counter with the Registry on or before 15.05.2026 by serving copy of the counter to the Complainants by RPAD. However, the Respondent has failed to file the vakalat and counter as directed by this Authority, therefore, a cost of Rs.5,000/- payable to CM Relief fund is imposed on the Respondent with a direction to file vakalat and counter within two weeks from today with the Registry along with cost paid memo and serve copy to the Complainants by RPAD. Posted to 27.07.2026 for filing Proof Affidavit by the Complainants.
Next: 27 Jul 2026, for filing Proof Affidavit by the Complainants
-
17 Jun 2026 Cause list, item 6
-
15 Apr 2026 Case diary, item 11
014/2026
The counsel for the Complainants present. The counsel M/s. K.V.Bashyam Chari present and again sought three weeks time to file vakalat and Counter on behalf of the Respondent. The Respondent is directed to file vakalat and Counter with the Registry on or before 15.05.2026 by serving copy of the counter to the Complainants by RPAD. Posted to 17.06.2026 for filing Proof Affidavit by the Complainants.
Next: 17 Jun 2026, for filing Proof Affidavit by the Complainants
-
15 Apr 2026 Cause list, item 11
-
2 Mar 2026 Case diary, item 5
014/2026
The counsel for the Complainants present. The counsel M/s. K.V.Bashyam Chari present and undertook to file vakalat and Counter on behalf of the Respondent. Posted to 15.04.2026 for filing vakalat and Counter by the Respondent.
Next: 15 Apr 2026, for filing vakalat and Counter by the Respondent
-
2 Mar 2026 Cause list, item 5
Read from the cause lists and case diaries TN RERA publishes. A listing is a dispute being heard, not a finding; the final order, once passed, is the decision.
Ask the records, or walk the map.
LandLens One answers from Tamil Nadu land law itself, cited to the page, then acts on the registers. One Map lights them up on the parcel. Your history stays in one place across both.
YOU APPROVE ANY SPEND
*Some tools are free of charge, but you need a credit balance to use LandLens One and One Map chat.