Complaint before the TN RERA Authority
C.No.150/2024
Parties, as the latest list prints them
- Complainant
- Brigade Xanadu Aspiro Owners Association
- Respondent
- 1.M/s.Brigade Enterprises Limited ...Respondent 2. Mr.Rakesh Reddy Chillakuru 3. Mr. Jithesh Padmini Gangatharan 4. Mr.S.Murali Krishnan 5. Mr.Raju Pandian 6. Mr.Thirumalai Raj 7. Mr.K.Murugan ... Impleaded Respondents
Hearings, newest first
-
12 Oct 2026 Case diary, item 30
Counsel for Complainant present and filed additional documents. Counsel for the Respondent-1 present Counsel for Respondents-2 to 7 present. The counsel for the Respondent-1 argued that the dispute is over a common driveway between Cluster 1 (Aspiro) and Cluster2 (Bonito) of Brigade Xanadu project. Further the Respondent submitted that the driveway is designed as common to all clusters as per approved CMDA plan, construction agreements, sale deed and not exclusive use of Aspiro. There is a dispute in the pattas obtained by the Aspiro owners for 6.42 acres which the Brigade seeking to cancel before the Hon’ble High Court. The temporary barricades constructed on the driveway were removed now that the construction of Bonito is complete, whereas the complainant allegedly trying to block the driveway with permanent barricades will endangers the emergency vehicle access and violates contractual rights of the purchasers. Regarding the interim relief of the Complainant restraining the Respondent from misrepresenting the driveway on north side of Aspiro as common driveway for Bonito, the Respondent has submitted that the Complainant cannot challenge the d l d h f h ll h approved plan and this is not an appropriate forum to challenge the approved plan since this Authority does not have jurisdiction. Moreover, the declarations signed by the owners of Aspiro acknowledging the common use of driveways and phased development. The counsel for Respondents-2 to 7 submitted that they are adopting the arguments of the 1st Respondent. Regarding the patta issue, the counsel for the Complainant submitted that the patta of the subject case is clear and the sale deeds have already been registered in favour of the Complainant Association. The counsel for the complainant submitted that additional notes on submissions will be filed before the Registry and sought time to file the same. The Authority heard and directed both the parties to file written submissions within 15 days before the Registry. Reserved for orders.
-
12 Oct 2026 Cause list, item 30
C.No.150/2024 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
23 Sep 2026 Case diary, item 16
Counsel for Complainant present and filed extra copy of documents, Counsel for the Respondent-1 present and again sought time to argue the case. Respondents-2 to 7 called absent. Posted to 12.10.2026 for further arguments by the Complainant and arguments by the Respondents finally. No more adjournment.
Next: 12 Oct 2026, for further arguments by the Complainant and arguments by the Respondents finally
-
23 Sep 2026 Cause list, item 16
-
12 Aug 2026 Case diary, item 24
Counsel for Complainant present Counsel for the Respondent-1 present and sought time to argue the case by the senior counsel. Counsel for Respondents-2 to 7 present Counsel for the Complainant argued the case. Posted the case to 23.09.2026 for further arguments by the Complainant and arguments by the Respondents finally.
Next: 23 Sep 2026, for further arguments by the Complainant and arguments by the Respondents finally
-
12 Aug 2026 Cause list, item 24
C.No.150/2024 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
1 Apr 2026 Case diary, item 20
For the Complainant Association Mr. Chevanan Mohan for Viruksham Legal present and filed Summary of important references in documents and argued the matter. The learned counsel for the Complainant Association undertook to file written submission within one week. The Authority directs the Complainant Association to file written submission of arguments within one week from today before the Registry by serving copy to the Respondent-1. For Respondent-1, Mr.Manishankhar for M/s. Duo Associates present and argued the matter and filed written arguments by serving copy to other side. For Respondents-2 to 7, Mr.Kuberan for M/s. Renu Associates present and argued the matter. The counsel for the Respondents-2 to 7 sought permission to file an Affidavit regarding the survey numbers, which the Authority permits to file within two weeks from today before the Registry by serving copy to other side by RPAD. The Authority heard all the parties and reserved for orders.
-
1 Apr 2026 Cause list, item 20
-
23 Mar 2026 Case diary, item 26
150/2024
The counsel for the Complainant present and submitted that their senior counsel is unable to be present today due to some emergency and sought adjournment of the case for arguments. The Counsel for the 1st Respondent present The Counsel for the Respondents-2 to 7 present The matter is adjourned to 01.04.2026 for arguments finally.
Next: 1 Apr 2026, for arguments finally
-
23 Mar 2026 Cause list, item 26
-
16 Mar 2026 Case diary, item 16
150/2024
The counsel for the Complainant present and sought time to argue the matter by their senior counsel. The Counsel for the 1st Respondent present The Counsel for the Respondents-2 to 7 present Today the hearing is posted for arguments. However, at the request of the complainant the matter is adjourned to 23.03.2026 for arguments finally. No more adjournment.
Next: 23 Mar 2026, for arguments finally
-
16 Mar 2026 Cause list, item 16
C.No.150/2024 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
4 Feb 2026 Case diary, item 26
150/2024
The Counsel for the Complainant present and filed Proof of Affidavit and served copy to the Counsel for Respondent-1 and Respondents-2 to 7. The Counsel for the 1st Respondent present The Counsel for the Respondents-2 to 7 present The Respondents are directed to file their response, if any, to the Proof Affidavit filed by the Complainant within two weeks before the Registry by serving copy to the Complainant by RPAD. The matter is adjourned to 16.03.2026 for arguments.
Next: 16 Mar 2026, for arguments
-
4 Feb 2026 Cause list, item 26
Listed for hearing.
-
7 Jan 2026 Case diary, item 10
150/2024
The Counsel for the Complainant present and seeks time to file Proof of Affidavit. The Counsel for the 1st Respondent present The Counsel for the Respondents-2 to 7 present The matter is adjourned to 04.02.2026 for filing Proof of Affidavit by the Complainant.
Next: 4 Feb 2026, for filing Proof of Affidavit by the Complainant
-
7 Jan 2026 Cause list, item 10
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M..
-
9 Apr 2025 Case diary, item 20
150/2024
The Counsel for the Complainant present and seeks time to file written submission of arguments. The Counsel for the 1st Respondent present and filed Additional Counter by serving copy to the Complainant. The Counsel for the Respondents-2 to 7 present and filed Counter with copy served on the Complainant. The Counsel for the Impleading Petitioner present. The Authority directs the Complainant to file written submission of arguments within two weeks from today i.e. on or before 22.04.2025 with Registry by serving copy to the other side. Reserved for order on the Interim Reliefs prayed by the Complainant.
Next: 22 Apr 2025
-
9 Apr 2025 Cause list, item 20
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M..
-
26 Mar 2025 Case diary, item 16
150/2024
The Counsel for the Complainant present. The Counsel for the 1st Respondent present and filed Counter along with typed set document by serving copy to the Complainant. The Counsel for the Complainant insisted for the interim relief “B” to be ordered for compliance by the 1st Respondent. The Counsel for the 1st Respondent seeks time for getting instruction from the Respondent-1. The Counsel for the Respondents-2 to 7 present and seek time to file Counter. Posted to 09.04.2025 for filing Counter by Respondents-2 to 7.
Next: 9 Apr 2025, for filing Counter by Respondents-2 to 7
-
26 Mar 2025 Cause list, item 16
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M..
-
26 Feb 2025 Case diary, item 12
150/2024
The Counsel for the Complainant present. The Counsel for the Respondent present. Both the Counsel for the Complainant and the Counsel for the Respondent stated that they have no objection to the impleading petition filed by the 3rd party petitioner and made endorsement to this effect in the IA No.2/2025. Hence, the Authority allowed the IA No.2/2025. The Counsel for Respondent seeks time to file Counter. For filing Counter by all the Respondents posted to 26.03.2025.
Next: 26 Mar 2025, for filing Counter by all the Respondents
-
26 Feb 2025 Cause list, item 12
Listed for hearing.
-
22 Jan 2025 Case diary, item 10
150/2024
The Counsel for the Complainant present. The Counsel M/s. Arjun suresh for Respondent present and filed vakalat. The Counsel for the proposed third party impleading petitioner present and filed IA in the Registry for impleading them as party to this proceedings. The Authority directs both complainant and the Respondent to file Counter to the IA filed by the proposed impleading petitioner and also Counter to the main complaint by the Respondent. Posted to 26.02.2025.
Next: 26 Feb 2025
-
22 Jan 2025 Cause list, item 10
Read from the cause lists and case diaries TN RERA publishes. A listing is a dispute being heard, not a finding; the final order, once passed, is the decision.
Ask the records, or walk the map.
LandLens One answers from Tamil Nadu land law itself, cited to the page, then acts on the registers. One Map lights them up on the parcel. Your history stays in one place across both.
YOU APPROVE ANY SPEND
*Some tools are free of charge, but you need a credit balance to use LandLens One and One Map chat.
