Complaint before the TN RERA Authority
C.No.155/2024 (Arguments)
Parties, as the latest list prints them
- Complainant
- Vasa Siva Naga Ganesh Kumar
- Respondent
- M/s.Malles Constructions Pvt.Ltd
Hearings, newest first
-
16 Nov 2026 Cause list, item 18
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M (Arguments).
-
30 Sep 2026 Case diary, item 23
C.No.155/2024
Complainant party in person present and made his further submissions. Counsel for Respondent present and filed their response and clarification to the independent engineer's report in a tabular column. The counsel for Respondent further stated that the reliefs sought by the Complainant are already adjudicated in another complaint in C.No.33/2025 filed by the Association. As the same relief is prayed by the Association in C.No.33/2025, the prayer as sought for by the Complainant in this complaint with respect to the common amenities is not entertained separately. The Authority already felt that the Complainant has to limit his plea pertaining to his Villa level when there is a complaint by the Association in the same project in respect of common issues is being adjudicated by this Authority. At the request of the Respondent, the matter is posted to 16.11.2026 for final arguments.
Next: 16 Nov 2026, for final arguments
-
30 Sep 2026 Cause list, item 23
C.No. 155/2024 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
2 Sep 2026 Case diary, item 16
C.No.155/2024
Complainant party in person present and filed photographs, taken highlighting some defects in the project site. The complainant argued that the inspection is not covered whole issues. Further the Complainant stated that the amenities promised in the Brochure are not completed; there are infrastructure defects; documents pertaining to his Villa not handed over and there are pipes damaged as seen from the photographs filed. Counsel for Respondent present and filed their response to the independent engineer's report in a tabular column and sought time for arguments in maintainability petition. The Authority has observed that a separate complaint filed by the Association in respect of the same project is pending adjudication. Accordingly, the Registry is directed to compare both petitions with regard to the respective prayers sought therein. In the event that the issues raised by the Complainant herein have not been separately raised by the Association in its pending complaint, the Authority shall proceed to deal with both matters separately. Otherwise, the Complainant shall limit to his plea pertaining to his Villa level. Posted to 30.09.2026 for further arguments in maintainability and in main case.
Next: 30 Sep 2026, for further arguments in maintainability and in main case
-
2 Sep 2026 Cause list, item 16
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
29 Jul 2026 Case diary, item 17
C.No.155/2024
Complainant party in person present and filed a Memo along with photographs highlighting some defects in the project site. Counsel for Respondent present and filed their response to the independent engineer's report and sought time for a detailed arguments. Counsel for the Respondent also undertook to file a detailed reply covering the issues raised by the Complainant, findings of the independent engineer and their response in a tabular column on or before next hearing. Posted to 02.09.2026 for arguments.
Next: 2 Sep 2026, for arguments
-
29 Jul 2026 Cause list, item 17
-
17 Jun 2026 Case diary, item 13
C.No.155/2024
The Complainant party in person present and filed their response to the independent engineer’s report along with additional typed set of documents and served copy to the counsel for the Respondent. The counsel for the Respondent present. The learned counsel for the Respondent submitted that the Appeal filed by the Respondent regarding appointment of independent engineer has been dismissed by the Hon’ble Appellate Tribunal and the CMSA filed before the Hon’ble High Court has been withdrawn by the Respondent. As such no issue is pending regarding appointment of independent engineer. The Respondent is directed to file their remarks on the report of independent engineer within two weeks from today before the Registry by serving copy to the Complainant by RPAD. Posted to 29.07.2026 for arguments.
Next: 29 Jul 2026, for arguments
-
17 Jun 2026 Cause list, item 13
-
2 Apr 2026 Case diary, item 11
C.No.155/2024
The Complainant party in person present. The Authority allowed the IA No.45 of 2025 for appointment of Independent Engineer filed by the Complainant vide its interim order dated 11.02.2026. The Counsel for the Respondent present and already filed an IA No.27 of 2025 for maintainability. The Authority felt that the issue relating to maintainability can be addressed while passing final orders in C.No.155/2024. In respect of appointment of Independent Engineer, the Authority already appointed one Thiru A. Malaichamy, Engineering Director (Retd.), CMWSSB Board as Independent Engineer to carry out the above assignment, however, he has expressed his inability to take up the assignment as he is stationed out of Chennai. Therefore, the Authority now appoints Thiru Kalimuthu, former SE, GCC to take up the inspection as sought for in the IA No.45/2025. The Independent Engineer should submit his report within one month and while taking up the inspection the Independent Engineer shall inform both the parties in advance so that the parties can be available at the time of inspection. On receipt of inspection report from the Independent Engineer, the Registry shall serve a copy of the inspection report to both the parties. The learned counsel for the Respondent submitted that they have preferred an Appeal before the Hon’ble Appellate Tribunal regarding appointment of Independent Engineer. However, there is no interim order passed by the Appellate Tribunal, therefore, the appointment of Independent Engineer can be go-ahead. Posted to 17.06.2026 for inspection report.
Next: 17 Jun 2026, for inspection report
-
2 Apr 2026 Cause list, item 11
-
25 Mar 2026 Cause list, item 21
155/2024 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing (Arguments).
Next: 2 Apr 2026, reposted, as the list's notice says
Notice on this list(Reposted to 02.04.2026) The List of cases listed for hearing before I Bench on 25.03.2026 at 3.00 P.M. have been reposted on administrative grounds to 02.04.2026 at 3.00 P.M will be held in New premises TNRERA Office, 4 th Floor “A” Wing at No.133, G-Block, 1 st Avenue, Anna Nagar (East), Chennai-600 102 .
-
17 Sep 2025 Case diary, item 21
C.No.155/2024
The Complainant party in person present The Counsel for Respondent present and filed index to typed set of additional documents. Today the hearing is posted for arguments on the IA No.45/2025 filed by the Complainant for appointment of Independent Engineer. Both the parties made their submissions. The Authority reserved orders on the IA No.45/2025 for appointment of Independent Engineer. The Counsel for the Respondent sought time to file written submission of arguments which they shall file before the Registry within two weeks and copy shall also be served on the Complainant by RPAD. In respect of IA No.27 of 2025 filed by the Respondent for maintainability, the Authority will take up the maintainability issue along with main complaint after deciding the IA No.45/2025 for which orders is reserved. The date and time of next hearing on the main complaint will be intimated separately.
-
17 Sep 2025 Cause list, item 21
155/2024 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
13 Aug 2025 Case diary, item 14
C.No.155/2024
The Complainant party in person present and filed Rejoinder to the Counter filed by the Respondent along with photographs showing the status of sewage pipelines in the project site with copy served to the Respondent. The Counsel for Respondent present and filed e-mail communication sent to the Complainant. The Counsel for the Complainant already filed Counter in the IA 27 of 2025 filed by the Respondent for maintainability. The Authority already directed the Counsel for the Respondent to rectify the defects as pointed out by the Complainant and settle the issue amicably. The Authority directs the Respondent to file Counter in the IA No.45/2025 filed by the Complainant for appointment of Independent Engineer within 10 days from today i.e. on or before 23.08.2025 before the Registry by serving copy to the Complainant. Posted to 17.09.2025 for arguments on the IA.
Next: 17 Sep 2025, for arguments on the IA
-
13 Aug 2025 Cause list, item 14
-
25 Jun 2025 Case diary, item 25
C.No.155/2024
The Complainant party in person present. The Counsel for Respondent present and already filed Counter Affidavit with Registry. The Counsel for the Complainant submitted that the copy of the Counter has not been served to them. The Authority directs the Counsel for the Respondent to serve copy of the Counter to the Complainant today itself. In the meantime the Authority also directs the Counsel for the Respondent to advise their client to rectify the defects as pointed out by the Complainant and settle the issue amicably. Posted to 13.08.2025 for filing Counter in IA by the Respondent/ Complainant.
Next: 13 Aug 2025, for filing Counter in IA by the Respondent/ Complainant
-
25 Jun 2025 Cause list, item 25
-
30 Apr 2025 Case diary, item 8
C.No.155/2024
The Complainant party in person present and filed response to the IA filed by the Respondent. Also, the Complainant filed an Affidavit for appointment of independent Engineer by serving copy to the Counsel for the Respondent which is recorded. The Counsel for Respondent present and submitted that in the copy of the complaint served to them there are some paragraphs missing and requested for proper copy of the complaint. The Registry informs that the proper copy of the complaint was sent to the Respondent and the copy produced with missing paragraphs by the Respondent is not the copy sent by this Authority. Also, the Registry produced the clear copy of the complaint which was sent to the Respondent on 10.01.2025 through RPAD. The Respondent should have contacted the Registry or the complainant to get the proper copy of the complaint if they are more responsible to file Counter in time as directed by this Authority. Therefore, it shows the intension of the Respondent to drag on the issue. However, the Authority directs the Complainant to send clean copy of the Complaint to the Respondent through e-mail and the Respondent is directed to file counter in the main Complaint within one month from today in the Registry by serving copy of the counter to the Complainant either through e-mail or by RPAD. Posted to 25.06.2025.
Next: 25 Jun 2025
-
30 Apr 2025 Cause list, item 8
-
12 Mar 2025 Case diary, item 24
155/2024
The Complainant party in person present The Counsel for Respondent present and filed IA on the maintainability. The Authority directs the Registry to number it, if it is in order. The Authority directs the Respondent to file Counter on the main complaint by serving copy to the Complainant. The Authority also directs the Complainant to file their response, if any, on the IA filed by the Respondent. Posted to 30.04.2025.
Next: 30 Apr 2025
-
12 Mar 2025 Cause list, item 24
-
29 Jan 2025 Case diary, item 1
155/2024
The Complainant party in person present The Counsel M/s.Ganesh and Ganesh for Respondent present and undertook to file vakalat. Posted to 12.03.2025 for vakalat and Counter by Respondent.
Next: 12 Mar 2025, for vakalat and Counter by Respondent
-
29 Jan 2025 Cause list, item 1
Read from the cause lists and case diaries TN RERA publishes. A listing is a dispute being heard, not a finding; the final order, once passed, is the decision.
Ask the records, or walk the map.
LandLens One answers from Tamil Nadu land law itself, cited to the page, then acts on the registers. One Map lights them up on the parcel. Your history stays in one place across both.
YOU APPROVE ANY SPEND
*Some tools are free of charge, but you need a credit balance to use LandLens One and One Map chat.
