Complaint before the TN RERA Authority
C.No.021/2025
Parties, as the latest list prints them
- Complainant
- Sobha Westhill Owners Association
- Respondent
- 1.M./s.Sobha Limited. 2.Mr.Jagadish Nangineni 3.Mr.Ravi PNC Menon 4.Mr.Sabarinathan
Hearings, newest first
-
26 Oct 2026 Case diary, item 29
Counsel for Complainant Association present Counsel for the Respondents present The Authority heard the arguments by both sides and posted to 23.11.2026 for further arguments. In the meantime, both the parties are directed to file written submission of arguments within two weeks before the Registry, if not filed already.
Next: 23 Nov 2026, for further arguments
-
26 Oct 2026 Cause list, item 29
-
14 Oct 2026 Case diary, item 10
Counsel for Complainant Association present Counsel for the Respondents present Both the counsels argued the matter in detail. The Authority heard the parties and needs clarification from the Respondent whether the land gifted is for public purpose or OSR land and the details of infrastructures put up in the lands gifted to Localbody. This needs to be clarified by the Respondent during next hearing. Posted to 26.10.2026 for further arguments.
Next: 26 Oct 2026, for further arguments
-
14 Oct 2026 Cause list, item 10
-
24 Aug 2026 Case diary, item 32
Counsel for Complainant Association present and filed additional typed set of documentsalready made their oral submissions. Counsel for the Respondents present and filed typed set documents and two citations in support of his arguments. Regarding allegation that the common amenities are constructed in the land gifted for road and parks, the Respondents denied and stated that the common amenities are provided within the approved layout area and there is no violation. A copy of the approved drawing and approval letters are furnished in the typed set documents. Regarding the allegation that OSR land is encroached by the Respondents, the counsel for the Respondents submitted that they have not encroached the OSR land gifted to Localbody, whereas the Respondent has constructed UG sump and cited the judgement of Madurai Bench of Hon'ble High Court of Madras dated 15.04.2026, wherein in para 7, the Hon'ble Bench has held that the land gifted in favour of the localbody for the purpose of open space reserved area can be utilised for the purpose of putting up sewage lifting station. p p p g p g g The counsel for the Respondent further submitted that a civil suit is pending before the District Magistrate Court, Coimbatore filed by Complainant Association against the maintenance charges and for status- quo order. The maintenance of the project has already been handed over to the Complainant Association. The case is adjourned to the effect that the complainant has agreed to withdraw the civil suit. On this condition, the case is adjourned for status of civil suit. Regarding the STP constructed over the plot No.12 owned by the Respondent, the Respondent has agreed to handover the plot No.12 to the Association. In the meantime, both the parties are at liberty to file written submission of arguments before the Registry. Posted to 14.10.2026 for further adjudication.
Next: 14 Oct 2026, for further adjudication
-
24 Aug 2026 Cause list, item 32
C.No.21/2025 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
17 Aug 2026 Case diary, item 26
Counsel for Complainant present and submitted that the Respondent has constructed the bore wells in the land gifted to the Corporation. The compound wall constructed by the Respondent has been demolished by the Corporation as encroachment. In the land gifted for the purpose of road and parks, Respondent has constructed common amenities. The STP has been constructed in the plot No.12 the ownership of the plot lies with the Respondent. Counsel for the Respondent specifically alleged that they have not encroached the OSR land and all the infrastructure are provided in the common areas and sought time for arguments in respect of OSR issue. Posted to 24.08.2026 for arguments by the Respondent finally.
Next: 24 Aug 2026, for arguments by the Respondent finally
-
17 Aug 2026 Cause list, item 27
C.No.21/2025 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
8 Jul 2026 Case diary, item 26
The counsel for Complainant present The counsel for Respondents present and sought time to argue the matter since their senior counsel is not available today to argue the matter. The Authority posted the matter to 17.08.2026 for arguments finally. If the Respondents do not argue the matter during next hearing, the opportunity to argue the matter will be closed.
Next: 17 Aug 2026, for arguments finally
-
8 Jul 2026 Cause list, item 26
C.No.21/2025 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
15 Jun 2026 Case diary, item 17
021/2025
The counsel for Complainant present and filed Memo requesting to remove the name of the first counsel for the Complainant M/s. Guruprasad from the counsels for the Complainant and the memo is recorded. The counsel for Respondents-1 to 4 present and filed adoption memo in respect of Respondents-2 to 4 adopting the counter filed by the Respondent-1 and served copy to the counsel for the Complainant. Posted to 08.07.2026 for arguments finally.
Next: 8 Jul 2026, for arguments finally
-
15 Jun 2026 Cause list, item 17
C.No.21/2025 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
22 Apr 2026 Case diary, item 16
021/2025
The counsel for Complainant present The counsel for Respondents-1 to 4 present and sought time for filing adoption memo in respect of Respondents-2 to 4. The Authority directs the Respondents-2 to 4 to file adoption memo within two weeks from today before the Registry by serving copy to the Complainant by RPAD. Posted to 15.06.2026 for arguments.
Next: 15 Jun 2026, for arguments
-
22 Apr 2026 Cause list, item 16
C.No.21/2025 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
9 Mar 2026 Case diary, item 8
021/2025
The counsel for Complainant present and sought permission to file additional typed set documents. The counsel for Respondents-1 to 4 present and submitted that Counter Affidavit has been filed by the Respondent-1 and undertook to file adoption memo on behalf of the Respondents-2 to 4 adopting the Counter filed by the Respondent-1. The Authority directs the Complainant to file a Memo along with typed set documents within two weeks from today before the Registry by serving copy to the Respondents-1 to 4 by RPAD. The Respondents-2 to 4 are directed to file Adoption Memo within two weeks from today before the Registry by serving copy to the Complainant by RPAD. Posted to 22.04.2026 for arguments.
Next: 22 Apr 2026, for arguments
-
9 Mar 2026 Cause list, item 8
-
10 Nov 2025 Case diary, item 33
021/2025
The Counsel for Complainant present and argued the matter with respect to IA filed by the Respondent. The Counsel for Respondents-1 to 4 present and argued the matter with respect to IA filed by them to delete the name of the 4th Respondent from this proceeding. Reserved for orders on the IA No.25/2025.
-
10 Nov 2025 Cause list, item 33
C.No.21/2025 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
27 Oct 2025 Case diary, item 9
021/2025
The Counsel for Complainant present and filed Rejoinder to the Counter filed by the Respondents in the main complaint and served copy to the Counsel for the Respondents. The Complainant also filed Counter to the IA petition filed by the Respondent in the Registry and submitted that they served copy of the Counter to the Respondent through e-mail already. The Counsel for Respondents-1 to 4 present. The matter is adjourned to 10.11.2025 for arguments on the IA.
Next: 10 Nov 2025, for arguments on the IA
-
27 Oct 2025 Cause list, item 9
C.No.21/2025 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
17 Sep 2025 Case diary, item 11
021/2025
The Counsel for Complainant present The Counsel M/s. G.Vivekanand for the Respondent-1 present and filed vakalat for Respondents-2 to 4 along with Counter on behalf of the Respondent-1 with typed set documents. The Counsel for the Respondent-4 also filed an IA petition for deleting the name of the Respondent-4 and submitted that similar petitions will also be filed for removing the name of the Respondents-2 & 3 as they are not necessary parties in this proceeding. The Registry is directed to number it, if it is in order. In the meantime, the Complainant is directed to file Counter to the IA petition filed by the Respondent within two weeks in the Registry with copy served to the Respondent. The matter is adjourned to 27.10.2025 for arguments on the IA.
Next: 27 Oct 2025, for arguments on the IA
-
17 Sep 2025 Cause list, item 11
-
6 Aug 2025 Case diary, item 19
021/2025
The Counsel for Complainant present The Counsel M/s. G.Vivekanand for the Respondent-1 present and filed vakalat and sought time to file Counter. All other Respondents called absent. Posted to 17.09.2025 for filing Counter by Respondent-1
Next: 17 Sep 2025, for filing Counter by Respondent-1
-
6 Aug 2025 Cause list, item 19
-
2 Jul 2025 Case diary, item 1
021/2025
The Counsel for Complainant present The Counsel M/s. Priyanka for Respondent present and undertook to file vakalat. Posted to 06.08.2025 for vakalat and Counter by the Respondent.
Next: 6 Aug 2025, for vakalat and Counter by the Respondent
-
2 Jul 2025 Cause list, item 1
Read from the cause lists and case diaries TN RERA publishes. A listing is a dispute being heard, not a finding; the final order, once passed, is the decision.
Ask the records, or walk the map.
LandLens One answers from Tamil Nadu land law itself, cited to the page, then acts on the registers. One Map lights them up on the parcel. Your history stays in one place across both.
YOU APPROVE ANY SPEND
*Some tools are free of charge, but you need a credit balance to use LandLens One and One Map chat.
