Complaint before the TN RERA Authority
C.No.38/2025
Parties, as the latest list prints them
- Complainant
- Amethyst Owners Association- Sholinganallur
- Respondent
- M/s.Casa Grande Axiom Private Limited
Hearings, newest first
-
12 Oct 2026 Case diary, item 26
Counsel for the Complainant present and argued that the construction has not been done as per approved plan. There have been irregular car parks and near the car parks there are lumber rooms set up by the Respondent and sold to allottees which are not in the approved plan. Only 305 car parks are approved as per the plan approval, whereas the Respondent has converted the driveway in an allotted setback space meant for entry and exit into 37 car parks. Also the entry and exit route via Sivaprakasam Naicker Salai has been blocked by the Respondent by constructing certain structures. There are totally 99 car parks are in excess to the approved car parks by CMDA. The lawn spaces which are open to sky in the project are also sold illegally by the Respondent. The counsel for the complainant prayed this Authority to direct the Respondent to comply with all the conditions as per plan approved by CMDA; to cancel the allotment of all car parks and re-allot as per the plan approved; provide entry and exit route via Sivaprakasam Naicker Salai to residents and to cancel all lumber rooms allotment. Counsel for the Respondent present and sought time for arguments by their senior counsel. Posted to 18.11.2026 for Respondent’s side arguments.
Next: 18 Nov 2026, for Respondent’s side arguments
-
12 Oct 2026 Cause list, item 26
C.No.38/2025 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
24 Aug 2026 Case diary, item 24
Representing counsel for the Complainant present and sought time for arguments. Counsel for the Respondent Promoter present. Posted to 12.10.2026 for arguments finally.
Next: 12 Oct 2026, for arguments finally
-
24 Aug 2026 Cause list, item 24
C.No.38/2025 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
8 Jul 2026 Case diary, item 23
The counsel for the Complainant present. The counsel for the Respondent Promoter present and filed Reply to the Rejoinder filed by the Complainant by serving copy to the counsel for the Complainant. The matter is posted to 24.08.2026 for arguments finally.
Next: 24 Aug 2026, for arguments finally
-
8 Jul 2026 Cause list, item 23
C.No.38/2025 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
10 Jun 2026 Case diary, item 18
38/2025
The counsel for the Complainant present. The counsel for the Respondent Promoter present and submitted that they are in the process of collecting documents and sought time to file reply to the rejoinder filed by the Complainant and also for arguments. The Respondent is directed to file their response to the rejoinder filed by the Complainant within two weeks from today before the Registry and serve copy to the Complainant by RPAD. The matter is adjourned to 08.07.2026 for arguments finally.
Next: 8 Jul 2026, for arguments finally
-
10 Jun 2026 Cause list, item 18
C.No.38/2025 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
8 Apr 2026 Case diary, item 20
38/2025
The counsel for the Complainant present. The counsel for the Respondent Promoter present and again sought time to file reply to the rejoinder filed by the Complainant and also for arguments. The Respondent is directed to filed their response to the rejoinder filed by the Complainant within two weeks from today before the Registry and serve copy to the Complainant by RPAD. Since both the parties sought time for arguments, the matter is adjourned to 10.06.2026 for arguments finally. The matter is posted to 10.06.2026 for arguments.
Next: 10 Jun 2026, for arguments
-
8 Apr 2026 Cause list, item 20
C.No.38/2025 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
4 Mar 2026 Case diary, item 18
38/2025
The counsel for the Complainant present and argued the matter. The counsel for the Respondent Promoter present and sought time for filing their reply to the rejoinder filed by the Complainant. During last hearing, the Authority directed the Respondent to file their response, if any, to the rejoinder filed by the complainant within two weeks from 04.02.2026. However, the Respondent is failed to file the reply. Therefore, considering the request of the Respondent, two weeks time is given to the Respondent to file reply to the rejoinder with the Registry, failing which a cost of Rs.5,000/- payable to CM Relief fund will be imposed. Also to serve copy of the reply to the Complainant by RPAD. The matter is adjourned to 08.04.2026 for arguments by Respondent finally.
Next: 8 Apr 2026, for arguments by Respondent finally
-
4 Mar 2026 Cause list, item 18
C.No.38/2025 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
4 Feb 2026 Case diary, item 31
38/2025
The counsel for the Complainant present and filed Rejoinder to the counter filed by the Respondent and already served copy to the Respondent. The counsel for the Respondent Promoter present. The Respondent-1 is at liberty to file their response to the Rejoinder, if any, and such response shall be filed with Registry within two weeks from today and serve copy to the Complainant by RPAD. Posted to 04.03.2026 for arguments.
Next: 4 Mar 2026, for arguments
-
4 Feb 2026 Cause list, item 31
-
18 Dec 2025 Case diary, item 6
38/2025
The counsel for the Complainant present. The counsel for the Respondent Promoter present. The Complainant wanted to file Rejoinder to the Counter filed by the Respondent and sought time to file Rejoinder. The Authority directs the Complainant to file Rejoinder within two weeks from today before the Registry and serve copy to the Respondent by RPAD. Posted to 04.02.2026 for arguments.
Next: 4 Feb 2026, for arguments
-
18 Dec 2025 Cause list, item 6
-
11 Dec 2025 Cause list, item 6
C.No.38/2025 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 4.00 P.M. (Arguments).
Next: 18 Dec 2025, reposted, as the list's notice says
Notice on this listOn Administrative grounds the following cases listed for hearing before Bench I on 11.12.2025 at 3.00P.M is re-posted to 18.12.2025 at 4.00 PM (Thursday) in New premises at Plot No.586,587 & 588, 1 st & 2 nd Avenue, Anna Nagar East, Chennai-600 102.
-
11 Dec 2025 Cause list, item 6
C.No.38/2025 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
Notice on this liston 26.11.2025 at 3.00P.M is re-posted to 11.12.2025 at 3.00 PM (Thursday) in New premises at Plot No.586,587 & 588, 1 st & 2 nd Avenue, Anna Nagar East, Chennai-600 102.
-
13 Oct 2025 Case diary, item 18
38/2025
The Complainant called absent. The Counsel for the Respondent Promoter present and filed Counter and sought time to file Cost Memo as the cost of Rs.5,000/- imposed by the Authority has already been paid to CM Relief Fund. It also appears from the remarks of the Registry that the Counsel M/s.Ganesh and Ganesh for the Respondent has not filed vakalat. Therefore, the Counsel M/s.Ganesh and Ganesh appeared on behalf of the Respondent is directed to file vakalat in the Registry, only then the Counter filed on behalf of the Respondent will be taken account of. The Respondent is directed to serve copy of the Counter to the complainant by RPAD, if not served already. Posted to 26.11.2025 for arguments.
Next: 26 Nov 2025, for arguments
-
13 Oct 2025 Cause list, item 18
Listed for hearing.
-
8 Sep 2025 Case diary, item 6
38/2025
The Counsel for the Complainant present. The Counsel for the Respondent Promoter present and undertook to file vakalat tomorrow i.e. on 9.09.2025 with the Registry and sought time to file Counter. The Authority directs the Respondent to file Counter within two weeks from today i.e. on or before 21.09.2025 in the Registry, failing whivh Rs.5,000/- will be imposed to be paid to CM Relief fund. Posted to 13.10.2025.
Next: 13 Oct 2025
-
8 Sep 2025 Cause list, item 6
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M..
-
20 Aug 2025 Case diary, item 4
38/2025
The Counsel for the Complainant present. The Counsel M/s.Ganesh and Ganesh for the Respondent Promoter present and undertook to file vakalat. Posted to 08.09.2025 for filing vakalat and Counter by Respondent.
Next: 8 Sep 2025, for filing vakalat and Counter by Respondent
-
20 Aug 2025 Cause list, item 4
Read from the cause lists and case diaries TN RERA publishes. A listing is a dispute being heard, not a finding; the final order, once passed, is the decision.
Ask the records, or walk the map.
LandLens One answers from Tamil Nadu land law itself, cited to the page, then acts on the registers. One Map lights them up on the parcel. Your history stays in one place across both.
YOU APPROVE ANY SPEND
*Some tools are free of charge, but you need a credit balance to use LandLens One and One Map chat.