Complaint before the TN RERA Authority
E.P.No.7/2026 in C.No.40/2020 (Arguments)
Parties, as the latest list prints them
- Complainant
- P. Suresh
- Respondent
- SPR & RG Construction Pvt. Ltd. & 2 ors.
Hearings, newest first
-
16 Nov 2026 Cause list, item 22
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M (Arguments).
-
30 Sep 2026 Case diary, item 9
EP.No.007/2026 in C.No.40/2020
Counsel for Execution Petitioner present Counsel for Respondents present and filed an IA by serving copy to the counsel for the Execution Petitioner. The counsel for the Execution Petitioner again submitted that an exclusive amount was collected from the allottees towards service connection of EB and CMWSSB and maintenance charges, therefore, the Respondents shall not deduct these charges again from the corpus fund as they have already collected these charges separately from the allottees. Therefore, prayed for direction to Respondent to transfer the corpus fund with interest accrued on the corpus fund by way of attachment of unsold flats. The counsel for the Respondents submitted that as already stated there are receivables from certain allottees to whom the UDS have not been conveyed and the issue of corpus fund can be settled once these amounts are received and they are taking efforts to resolve this issue shortly. Regarding the deductions made from the corpus fund, the counsel for the Respondents submitted that they have deducted the unforeseen expenses such as excess amount paid for getting dedicated metro water connection and excess amount deposited with electricity department and these unforeseen expenses they are eligible for deduction as per agreements. The Authority directs the Execution Petitioner to file an Affidavit with specific remarks on the amount collected towards corpus fund and the details of deductions made by the Respondent as per agreement and the balance amount to be transferred; also to state that out of the deductions made by the Respondents, what are all the deductions acceptable and not acceptable to the Execution Petitioners within two weeks before the Registry. Posted to 16.11.2026 for further arguments.
Next: 16 Nov 2026, for further arguments
-
30 Sep 2026 Cause list, item 9
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
24 Aug 2026 Case diary, item 19
EP.No.007/2026 in C.No.40/2020
Counsel for Execution Petitioner present and argued that the Respondent has not complied the directions issued by this Authority in its order dated 10.06.2022 in C.No.40/2020 wherein the Authority directed to transfer the corpus fund along with actual interest earned on this corpus fund after deducting the actual expenditure incurred from the corpus fund. The complainant stated that an exclusive amount was collected from the allottees towards service connection of EB and CMWSSB and maintenance charges, therefore, the Respondent shall not deduct these charges from the corpus fund as they have already collected these charges separately from the allottees. The counsel for the complainant prayed for direction to Respondent to transfer the corpus fund by way of attachment of unsold flats. Counsel for Respondents present and submitted that there are conditions upon which the Respondent made deductions from the corpus fund (i) unforeseen expenses and (ii) any expenses made by the d f d h h Respondent for maintaining premium amenities. It is stated that the Respondent spent excess towards EB charges and dedicated metro water connection charges and for revamping water treatment plant from the corpus fund against the amount received from the allottees. However, the balance amount of corpus fund can be transferred only upon receiving the amount from the unsold apartments which were already sold and are yet to be conveyed due to the direction by this Authority. The Respondent shall furnish the details with respect to quantum of corpus fund collected from the allottees, actual interest accrued on the corpus fund, eligible expenditure incurred from the corpus fund for the purpose for which the corpus fund is intended for on or before next hearing. The Authority heard the parties and posted to 30.09.2026 for further arguments.
Next: 30 Sep 2026, for further arguments
-
24 Aug 2026 Cause list, item 19
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
22 Jul 2026 Case diary, item 14
EP.No.007/2026 in C.No.40/2020
Counsel for Execution Petitioner present. Counsel for Respondents present. Both the parties argued the matter. Posted to 24.08.2026 for further arguments.
Next: 24 Aug 2026, for further arguments
-
22 Jul 2026 Cause list, item 14
-
17 Jun 2026 Case diary, item 24
EP.No.007/2026 in C.No.40/2020
The counsel for the Execution Petitioner present. The counsel for the Respondents present. The Respondents have paid the penalty of Rs.5 lakh on 16.06.2026 in pursuant to the directions of this Authority dated 15.06.2026 to comply with the earlier directions issued in E.P.No.17/2022 in C.No.40/2020 dated 08.05.2025 and to that effect a Memo of Compliance has been filed by the Respondents. Regarding the direction of this Authority to restore the area of club house based on the original approved plan, the learned counsel for the Respondents submitted during last hearing on 15.06.2026 that they have approached the CMDA for revised approval; however, the approval is yet to be accorded by CMDA. The Respondents shall initiate necessary action for getting revised approval from CMDA for the club house as expeditiously as possible. With respect to corpus fund, the learned counsel for the Execution Petitioner pleaded that the corpus fund payable by the Respondent may be quantified as per the provisions stipulated in the agreement entered b h d f h d b h between the parties and for that purpose a suggestion is made by the Respondent that both the parties can sit together and work out the amount payable. The learned counsel for the Execution Petitioner agreed to that. Therefore, the Authority directs both the Respondent and the Association of allottees to sit together and work out the corpus fund payable by the Respondent in accordance to the agreement entered between the parties. The above exercise would be completed within three weeks from 15.06.2026 and the amount of corpus fund should be transferred to the Association of allottees within one week i.e. the corpus fund issue shall be settled within 4 weeks altogether, failing which this Authority will impose penalty on the Respondents for every day delay beyond this period. The matter is posted to 22.07.2026 for reporting compliance by the Respondent.
Next: 22 Jul 2026, for reporting compliance by the Respondent
-
17 Jun 2026 Cause list, item 24
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
15 Jun 2026 Case diary, item 19
E.P.No.007/2026 in C.No.40/2020
The counsel for the Execution Petitioner present. The counsel for the Respondents present and filed typed set of documents by serving copy to the counsel for the Execution Petitioner. Both the parties argued the matter. The Respondents have not complied with the orders of this Authority passed in E.P.No.17/2022 in C.No.40/2020 dated 08.05.2025. Even the penalty of Rs.5 lakh imposed under Section 63 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 for non-compliance of the orders of this Authority dated 10.06.2022 has not been paid even after one year. Similarly, the direction to transfer the balance amount of corpus fund to the Association of allottees with the actual interest earned on the corpus fund has not been complied by the Respondents. After hearing both the parties, the Authority directs the Respondents to pay the corpus fund with interest as ordered in E.P.No.17/2022 in C.No.40/2020 dated 08.05.2025 within three weeks from today, failing which this Authority will impose penalty for every day delay beyond three weeks. In respect of penalty of Rs.5 lakh imposed by this Authority for non-compliance of the orders of this Authority dated 10.06.2022 in C.Nos.21 & 38 to 41 of 2020, the learned counsel for the Respondents undertook to remit the penalty by 17.06.2026 before the Registry. Regarding the direction of this Authority to restore the area of club house based on the original approved plan, the learned counsel for the Respondents submitted that they have approached the CMDA for revised approval; however, the approval is yet to be accorded by CMDA. The matter is posted to 17.06.2026 for reporting compliance of the interim directions by the Respondents and further adjudication.
Next: 17 Jun 2026, for reporting compliance of the interim directions by the Respondents and further adjudication
-
15 Jun 2026 Cause list, item 19
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
8 Jun 2026 Case diary, item 11
E.P.No.007/2026 in C.No.40/2020
The counsel for the Execution Petitioner present. The counsel for the Respondents present and filed Compliance Affidavit and Counter in EA No.2/2026 along with cost paid Memo. Also the counsel for the Respondents served copy of the Counter and Compliance Affidavit to the counsel for the Execution Petitioner. The matter is posted to 15.06.2026 for arguments.
Next: 15 Jun 2026, for arguments
-
8 Jun 2026 Cause list, item 11
-
20 Apr 2026 Case diary, item 10
E.P.No.007/2026 in C.No.40/2020
The counsel for the Execution Petitioner present The counsel for the Respondents present and sought time to file Compliance Affidavit in EP No.7/2026 and counter to the EA No.2/2026. The Authority directs the Respondents to file Compliance Affidavit in the EP and Counter Affidavit on the EA within two weeks before the Registry by serving copy to the Execution Petitioner by RPAD, failing which a cost of Rs.5,000/- payable to CM Relief fund will be imposed. The matter is posted to 08.06.2026 for filing compliance affidavit in EP and Counter to the EA by serving copy to the Execution Petitioner.
Next: 8 Jun 2026, for filing compliance affidavit in EP and Counter to the EA by serving copy to the Execution Petitioner
-
20 Apr 2026 Cause list, item 10
-
4 Mar 2026 Case diary, item 3
E.P.No.007/2026 in C.No.40/2020
The counsel for the Execution Petitioner present and filed EA with copy served to the counsel for the Respondents. The counsel M/s. A. Palaniappan present and undertook to file vakalat on behalf of the Respondents. The Registry is directed to number the EA, if it is found in order. The Respondents are directed to file Counter to the EA and Compliance Affidavit in EP. Posted to 20.04.2026 for filing compliance affidavit in EP and Counter to the EA by serving copy to the Execution Petitioner.
Next: 20 Apr 2026, for filing compliance affidavit in EP and Counter to the EA by serving copy to the Execution Petitioner
-
4 Mar 2026 Cause list, item 3
E.P.No.7/2026 in C.No.40/2020 (NEW)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (New).
-
4 Feb 2026 Case diary, item 15
C.40/2020
The Counsel for the Execution Petitioner present and made his submission. The Authority directs the Registry to number the SR and issue notice to Respondents. Posted to 18.03.2026.
Next: 18 Mar 2026
-
4 Feb 2026 Cause list, item 15
-
11 Dec 2024 Case diary, item 29
E.P.No.17/2022 In C.No.40/2020
Both Counsels for the Execution Petitioner and the Respondent present and made detailed arguments. The Authority heard the parties and reserved for orders.
-
11 Dec 2024 Cause list, item 29
E.P.No.17/2022 In C.No.40/2020 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing (Arguments).
-
6 Nov 2024 Case diary, item 40
E.P.No.17/2022 In C.No.40/2020
Both sides present. Posted to 11.12.2024 for arguments.
Next: 11 Dec 2024, for arguments
-
6 Nov 2024 Cause list, item 40
E.P.No.17/2022 In C.No.40/2020 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing (Arguments).
-
23 Oct 2024 Case diary, item 35
E.P.No.17/2022 In C.No.40/2020
Representing Counsel for the Execution Petitioner present and sought time to make arguments The Counsel for Respondents-1 & 2 present The Authority directs the Respondent to comply with the directions of this Authority dated 10.06.2022 and also to file written submission of arguments. Posted to 06.11.2024.
Next: 6 Nov 2024
-
23 Oct 2024 Cause list, item 35
-
24 Jul 2024 Case diary, item 21
E.P.No.17/2022 In C.No.40/2020
The Counsel for the Execution Petitioner present The Counsel for Respondents present Rival parties argued on the Execution Petition. Reserved for orders.
-
24 Jul 2024 Cause list, item 21
E.P.No.17/2022 in C.No.40/2020 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing (Arguments).
-
21 Jun 2024 Case diary, item 1
E.P.No.17 of 2022 in C.No.40 of 2020
The Counsel for the Execution Petitioner present The Counsel for Respondents present The arguments on this Execution Petition carried out. Posted to 24.07.2024 for final arguments.
Next: 24 Jul 2024, for final arguments
-
13 Jun 2024 Case diary, item 40
E.P.No.17/2022 In C.No.40/2020
The Counsel for the Execution Petitioner present The Counsel for Respondents present Posted to 21.06.2024 for final arguments on this Execution Petition.
Next: 21 Jun 2024, for final arguments on this Execution Petition
-
26 Apr 2024 Case diary, item 28
E.P.No.17/2022 In C.No.40/2020
The Counsel for the Execution Petitioner present The Counsel for Respondent present and filed additional typed set documents which is recorded. The Authority heard the parties and posted to 13.06.2024 for final arguments on this Execution Petition.
Next: 13 Jun 2024, for final arguments on this Execution Petition
-
4 Apr 2024 Case diary, item 46
E.P.No.17/2022 In C.No.40/2020
The Counsel for the Execution Petitioner present The Counsel for Respondent present. Part of arguments has been completed and the EP is posted to 26.04.2024 for continuing arguments.
Next: 26 Apr 2024, for continuing arguments
Read from the cause lists and case diaries TN RERA publishes. A listing is a dispute being heard, not a finding; the final order, once passed, is the decision.
Ask the records, or walk the map.
LandLens One answers from Tamil Nadu land law itself, cited to the page, then acts on the registers. One Map lights them up on the parcel. Your history stays in one place across both.
YOU APPROVE ANY SPEND
*Some tools are free of charge, but you need a credit balance to use LandLens One and One Map chat.
