Complaint before the TN RERA Authority
C.No.042/2024
Parties, as the latest list prints them
- Complainant
- Sri Sai Nagar Owners’ Welfare Association (SSNOWA)
- Respondent
- 1.M/s.J.K. Properties ... Respondent 2. Thiru K.Baskaran 3. L.Raja 4.M.Ganesh ... Impleaded Respondent
Hearings, newest first
-
21 Sep 2026 Case diary, item 13
Counsel for the Complainant present and filed Memo of compliance on the notice issued by the Localbody. Counsel for Respondents-1 & 2 present and filed copy of letter dated 28.08.2026 addressed to the Localbody by the Respondent-1. The counsel for the Complainant Association argued regarding club house offered by the Respondents that they are not accepting the offer at cost and it is for the Respondents who have to construct the club house and gym as promised in the brochure and the complainant is ready to pay the charges towards the use of club house and gym. Regarding the issue on Storm Water Drain, the counsel for the complainant argued that what are all the conditions imposed in the layout approval, the Respondent has to adhere to the conditions and as per Development Regulation No.29(11) of Second Master Plan the cost of laying improvement to the systems in respect of road, sewage, drainage, etc. has to be borne by the promoter. The counsel for the Respondent denies provision of storm water drain as it is the plotted layout project. The Authority heard the parties and reserved for orders.
-
21 Sep 2026 Cause list, item 13
C.No.042/2024 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
10 Aug 2026 Case diary, item 18
Counsel for the Complainant present and filed Memo along with written arguments and served copy to the counsel for the Respondents. Counsel for Respondents present. The counsel for the Complainant Association argued the matter and submitted that as per brochure the Respondents have not provided the club house and other common amenities. The Respondents have also encroached the OSR land gifted to the Localbody and constructed the club house and there is an order of Hon'ble High Court for eviction of the gifted land. The counsel for Complainant prayed for an interim direction not to alienate the remaining unsold 5 plots by the Respondents till disposal of this complaint. The counsel for the Respondents argued the matter and submitted that they have not promised the common amenities and the club house and Gym are exclusive. Moreoever, the Complainant has no right to claim for it as they have not paid any charges for use of club house and gym. However, the counsel for the Respondents offered to sell the club house and gym at cost to the Complainant Association which is recorded. The Authority heard the parties and observed that both the parties are encroachers as per the orders of the Hon'ble High Court and that the concerned Localbody shall take action on the encroachment of OSR land. Regarding the issue on Storm Water Drain, the matter is posted to 21.09.2026 for further arguments.
Next: 21 Sep 2026, for further arguments
-
10 Aug 2026 Cause list, item 18
C.No.042/2024 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
13 Jul 2026 Case diary, item 17
The counsel for the Complainant present. The Respondents called absent. The learned counsel for the Complainant submitted that the Respondents have not handed over the amenities as promised by them and therefore, sought interim relief in IA No.56/2025 praying to restrain the promoter not to sell the remaining unsold 5 plots. The Authority directs the Complainant to produce the copy of the Encumbrance Certificate to ascertain whether these plots are sold or still remain unsold. Posted to 10.08.2026 for submission of copy of Encumbrance Certificate by the Complainant.
Next: 10 Aug 2026, for submission of copy of Encumbrance Certificate by the Complainant
-
13 Jul 2026 Cause list, item 17
-
10 Jun 2026 Case diary, item 20
The counsel for the Complainant present. The counsel for the Respondents-1 & 2 present The counsel for the proposed Respondents-3 & 4 present The Authority allowed the IA No.26 & 27 of 2026 filed by the 3rd party petitioners and impleaded them as Respondents-3 & 4 in this proceeding and accordingly directs the Respondents-2, 3 & 4 to file counter in IA No.56/2025 as well as in the main case within two weeks from today before the Registry by serving copy to the Complainant and other parties. The case is adjourned to 13.07.2026 for arguments in the IA No.56/2025 as well as in the main case.
Next: 13 Jul 2026, for arguments in the IA No
-
10 Jun 2026 Cause list, item 20
C.No.042/2024 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
15 Apr 2026 Case diary, item 24
The counsel for the Complainant present. The counsel for the Respondents-1 & 2 present and filed Counter in the IA No.56/2025 on behalf of the Respondent-2 by serving copy to the counsel for the complainant. The learned counsel for the Respondents-1 & 2 also submitted that they want to file vakalat and impleading petition on behalf of Mr.M.Ganesh and Mr.L.Raja who are also the landowners of this project. The Authority directs the counsel for the Respondent to file vakalat along with impleading petition within two weeks from today before the Registry by serving copy to the Complainant. The leaned counsel for the Complainant submitted that they do not have any objection in impleading the remaining landowners. The case is adjourned to 10.06.2026 for arguments in the IA No.56/2025 as well as in the main case.
Next: 10 Jun 2026, for arguments in the IA No
-
15 Apr 2026 Cause list, item 24
-
16 Mar 2026 Case diary, item 21
The counsel for the Complainant present. The counsel for the proposed impleading 3rd party petitioner who is also appearing on change of vakalat for Respondent-1 present. The Complainant has already filed Counter to the impleading petition. The counsel for the Complainant and the Respondents argued regarding impleading petition filed by the proposed impleading 3rd party petitioner. After hearing the learned counsels for the Complainant and the Respondent as well as the counsel for the proposed impleading 3rd party petitioner, this Authority observed that based on the documents filed by the 3rd party petitioner in IA No.80/2025 such as patta and CMDA approval letter dated 15.09.2021, it is marked to Thiru K. Baskaran being one of the landowners. That being the case, Thiru K.Baskaran is necessary party to this proceedings. Therefore, the impleading petition is allowed and Thiru K.Baskaran is impleaded as Respondent-2 in this proceedings. The impleaded Respondent-2 is directed to file Counter in IA No.56/2025 and the main case within two weeks from today before the Registry and serve copy to other side by RPAD. The case is adjourned to 15.04.2026 for arguments in the IA No.56/2025 as well as in the main case.
Next: 15 Apr 2026, for arguments in the IA No
-
16 Mar 2026 Cause list, item 21
C.No.042/2024 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
11 Feb 2026 Case diary, item 26
The Counsel for the Complainant present. The Counsel for Respondent-1 present The Counsel for the proposed 3rd party petitioner present. The Registry brought to the notice of the Authority that an Appeal No.6/2026 has been filed by Respondent-1 before TNREAT challenging the interim direction of this Authority and the Hon’ble TNREAT has called for the entire records of C.No.42/204 vide TNREAT letter No.67/2026 and accordingly the entire documents have been transferred to TNREAT. That being the case, this Authority cannot proceed further in the matter. During last hearing the Authority directed the Complainant and the Respondent-1 to file their Counter in the IA filed by the proposed impleading 3rd party within one week from the date of receipt of copy of impleading petition from the proposed 3rd party. But the Counter has not been filed by both the Complainant and the Respondent-1 till today. The Counsel for the Respondent-1 submitted that they do not have any objection to the IA petition filed by the proposed 3rd party. The Authority directs the Complainant to file Counter to the IA filed by the proposed 3rd party within one week from today before the Registry and serve copy to the Respondent-1 and to the proposed 3rd party petitioner by RPAD, failing which a cost
-
11 Feb 2026 Cause list, item 26
C.No.042/2024 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
28 Jan 2026 Case diary, item 25
The Counsel for the Complainant present. A Counsel for Respondent-1 present The Counsel for the proposed 3rd party petitioner present. During last hearing the Authority directed the counsel for the proposed 3rd party petitioner to file impleading petition before the Registry and serve copy to the other side by RPAD, however, no impleading petition is filed yet. the Counsel for the proposed 3rd party petitioner is directed to file impleading petition within two days from today with copy served to the Complainant and Respondent-1. On receipt of copy of impleading petition from the 3rd party petitioner, the Complainant and the Respondent-1 shall file their Counter within one week before the Registry and serve copy to each other. The case is adjourned to 11.02.2026 for arguments in the IA.
Next: 11 Feb 2026, for arguments in the IA
-
28 Jan 2026 Cause list, item 25
C.No.042/2024 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
18 Dec 2025 Case diary, item 18
The Counsel for the Complainant present. A new Counsel M/s. M.Deivanandam for Respondent-1 present and filed change of vakalat and additional counter and served copy to the counsel for the Complainant. The Counsel for the proposed 3rd party petitioner present. The counsel for the proposed 3rd party petitioner is directed to file impleading petition before the Registry and serve copy to the other side by RPAD. The case is adjourned to 28.01.2026 for arguments in the IA.
Next: 28 Jan 2026, for arguments in the IA
-
18 Dec 2025 Cause list, item 18
-
11 Dec 2025 Cause list, item 18
C.No.042/2024 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 4.00 P.M. (Arguments).
Next: 18 Dec 2025, reposted, as the list's notice says
Notice on this listOn Administrative grounds the following cases listed for hearing before Bench I on 11.12.2025 at 3.00P.M is re-posted to 18.12.2025 at 4.00 PM (Thursday) in New premises at Plot No.586,587 & 588, 1 st & 2 nd Avenue, Anna Nagar East, Chennai-600 102.
-
11 Dec 2025 Cause list, item 18
C.No.042/2024 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
Notice on this liston 26.11.2025 at 3.00P.M is re-posted to 11.12.2025 at 3.00 PM (Thursday) in New premises at Plot No.586,587 & 588, 1 st & 2 nd Avenue, Anna Nagar East, Chennai-600 102.
-
5 Nov 2025 Case diary, item 8
The Counsel for the Complainant present A new Counsel M/s. G. Ashok Kumar for Respondent-1 present and undertook to file change of vakalat. One Mr. Baskaran 3rd party petitioner already filed an IA for impleading him as proposed Respondent in this Complaint seeking certain clarification to the interim direction passed by this Authority in this Complaint on 20.08.2025. The Respondent-1 is directed to file change of vakalat in the Registry within one week from today. The Counsel for Complainant and the Respondent-1 are directed to file Counter to the IA filed by 3rd party petitioner within one week from today and copy served to other side. The case is adjourned to 26.11.2025 for arguments in the IA.
Next: 26 Nov 2025, for arguments in the IA
-
5 Nov 2025 Cause list, item 8
C.No.042/2024 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
22 Sep 2025 Case diary, item 4
The Counsel for the Complainant present and filed Memo for having served the private notice to the Respondent. The Counsel for the Respondent present and filed Counter in IA with copy served to the Complainant. Also the Counsel for the Respondent filed Reply Statement to the Rejoinder filed by the Complainant and served copy to the Counsel for the Complainant. The Counsel for the Complainant submitted that even against the interim direction of this Authority not to create any encumbrance on the remaining plots, the Respondent has erected advertisement board for sale of plots. The Authority directs the Respondent to remove the advertisement boards erected for sale of plots within a week and file a Memo of compliance in the Registry. The case is adjourned to 05.11.2025 for arguments.
Next: 5 Nov 2025, for arguments
-
22 Sep 2025 Cause list, item 4
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M..
-
1 Sep 2025 Case diary, item 1
The Counsel for the Complainant present. The Respondent called absent The Authority reiterates its direction to the Respondent to ensure that the OSR area and the land designated for park in this project are free from any kind of encumbrance and not to alienate the remaining plots till disposal of this complaint. As a last chance the Authority directs the Respondent to file Counter in IA filed by the Complainant before the Registry by serving copy to the Complainant. Posted to 22.09.2025 for filing CA in IA by the Respondent finally.
Next: 22 Sep 2025, for filing CA in IA by the Respondent finally
-
1 Sep 2025 Cause list, item 1
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M..
-
20 Aug 2025 Case diary, item 17
The Counsel for the Complainant present. The Counsel for the Respondent present and sought adjournment of the case, as settlement talks are going on between the parties. The Authority directs the Respondent to ensure that the OSR area and the land designated for park in this project are free from any kind of encumbrance, as the area for OSR and the park area were already gifted to the Localbody. Moreover, the report for verification of any encroachment by the Respondent in respect of OSR and park area is still awaited from the Localbody. The Respondent is directed not to alienate the remaining plots till disposal of this complaint. The Respondent is also directed to file Counter, if any, to the IAs filed by the Complainant on or before next hearing. Posted to 01.09.2025.
Next: 1 Sep 2025
-
20 Aug 2025 Cause list, item 17
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M..
-
9 Jul 2025 Case diary, item 13
The Counsel for the Complainant present and filed 2 Interim Applications by serving copy to the Counsel for the Respondent. The Counsel for the Respondent present. The Registry is directed to number the IAs if it is in order. The Registry informed that they have already addressed the concerned Local body to depute some officials to this project site to inspect and verify any encroachment by the Respondent in respect of OSR area and the land designated for Park in this project which have already been gifted to the Local body by the Respondent and the report from the Local body is awaited. The Respondent is at liberty to file Counter, if any, to the IAs filed by the Complainant before next hearing with the Registry. Posted to 20.08.2025.
Next: 20 Aug 2025
-
9 Jul 2025 Cause list, item 13
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M.
-
30 Apr 2025 Case diary, item 2
The Counsel for the Complainant present and filed Rejoinder. The Counsel for the Respondent present. The Counsel for the Complainant informed that they have already represented to the concerned Localbody and Statutory Authority regarding encroachment of OSR area by the Respondent in this project and again requested this Authority to advise the concerned Localbody for removal of encroachment of OSR area in this project. The Authority directs the Registry to send a separate letter to the concerned Localbody to depute some officials to this project site to inspect and verify any encroachment by the Respondent in respect of OSR area and the land designated for Park in this project which have already been gifted to the Localbody by the Respondent and submit their report to this office. Posted to 09.07.2025.
Next: 9 Jul 2025
-
30 Apr 2025 Cause list, item 2
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M.
-
12 Mar 2025 Case diary, item 5
The Counsel for the Complainant present. The Counsel for the Respondent present. The Registry informed that the inspection report from the District Collector, Chengalpattu is still awaited. The Authority directs the Registry to send reminder again to the District Collector Chengalpattu for necessary instruction to the officials concerned for early inspection of the OSR area and the land designated for Park in this project by the Respondent namely M/s. J.K.Properties to Ottiyambakkam Panchayat Union vide document No.2090 of 2020 dated 17.2.2020 and document No.8726/2021 dated 29.07.2021 respectively and submit report to this Office for further proceedings by this office. The Counsel for the Complainant seeks time to file Rejoinder to the Counter filed by the Respondent. Posted to 30.04.2025 for filing Rejoinder by the Complainant to the Counter filed by the Respondent.
Next: 30 Apr 2025, for filing Rejoinder by the Complainant to the Counter filed by the Respondent
-
12 Mar 2025 Cause list, item 5
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M..
-
22 Jan 2025 Case diary, item 35
The Counsel for the Complainant present. The Counsel for the Respondent present. It is informed by the Registry that the inspection report from the concerned authorities are still awaited. The Authority directs the Registry to send reminder to the District Collector Chengalpattu for necessary instruction to the officials concerned for early inspection of the OSR area covering S.Nos.195/1B1, 197/ 1 & 2, 203/2, 208/1 and 225/1 and the land designated for Park in this project covering S.Nos.224/1A1, 224/3, 224/4, 224/1A2, 224/6A, 224/1B, 224/6B, 225/2, 226/2B and 226/3A of Ottiyambakkam Village, Tambaram Taluk, Chengalpattu District (formerly Kancheepuram District) already gifted by the Respondent in this Complaint namely M/s. J.K.Properties to Ottiyambakkam Panchayat Union vide document No.2090 of 2020 dated 17.2.2020 and document No.8726/2021 dated 29.07.2021 respectively. The above layout has been approved by CMDA vide CMDA layout PPD/LO No.36/2020 in Letter No.L1/19681/2018-19 dated 18.05.2020 and furnish report to this Authority within 3 weeks from today. Posted to 12.03.2025.
Next: 12 Mar 2025
-
22 Jan 2025 Cause list, item 35
Listed for hearing.
-
20 Nov 2024 Case diary, item 24
042/2024
The Counsel for the Complainant present. The Respondent called absent. The Authority in earlier occasion directed MS, CMDA and the District Collector, Chengalpattu for early inspection of the OSR area covering S.Nos.195/1B1, 197/ 1 & 2, 203/2, 208/1 and 225/1 and the land designated for Park in this project covering S.Nos.224/1A1, 224/3, 224/4, 224/1A2, 224/6A, 224/1B, 224/6B, 225/2, 226/2B and 226/3A of Ottiyambakkam Village, Tambaram Taluk, Chengalpattu District (formerly Kancheepuram District) already gifted by the Respondent in this Complaint namely M/s. J.K.Properties to Ottiyambakkam Panchayat Union vide document No.2090 of 2020 dated 17.2.2020 and document No.8726/2021 dated 29.07.2021 respectively. The above layout has been approved by CMDA vide CMDA layout PPD/LO No.36/2020 in Letter No.L1/19681/2018-19 dated 18.05.2020. The inspection reports are still awaited from the concerned Authorities. The Authority directs the Registry to send reminder to the Authorities concerned for early inspection and report to this Authority. Posted to 22.01.2025.
Next: 22 Jan 2025, for early inspection and report to this Authority
-
20 Nov 2024 Cause list, item 24
-
23 Oct 2024 Case diary, item 11
042/2024
The Counsel for the Complainant present. The Counsel for Respondent present. The report from CMDA and the District Collector, Chengalpattu are still awaited. Therefore, the Authority directs the Registry to send reminder to MS, CMDA and to the District Collector, Chengalpattu for early inspection of the OSR area covering S.Nos.195/1B1, 197/ 1 & 2, 203/2, 208/1 and 225/1 and the land designated for Park in this project covering S.Nos.224/1A1, 224/3, 224/4, 224/1A2, 224/6A, 224/1B, 224/6B, 225/2, 226/2B and 226/3A of Ottiyambakkam Village, Tambaram Taluk, Chengalpattu District (formerly Kancheepuram District) already gifted by the Respondent in this Complaint namely M/s.J.K.Properties to Ottiyambakkam Panchayat Union vide document No.2090 of 2020 dated 17.2.2020 and document No.8726/2021 dated 29.07.2021 respectively. The above layout has been approved by CMDA vide CMDA layout PPD/LO No.36/2020 in Letter No.L1/19681/2018-19 dated 18.05.2020. Posted to 20.11.2024.
Next: 20 Nov 2024
-
23 Oct 2024 Cause list, item 11
-
28 Aug 2024 Case diary, item 13
042/2024
The Counsel for the Complainant present. The Counsel for Respondent present and filed Counter along with an IA for appointing Advocate Commissioner. The Respondent also paid the cost imposed. The Counsel for Complainant Association submitted that the Respondent has encroached the land designated for parks and OSR in that project which were gifted to Localbody concerned. The Authority directs the Member-Secretary, CMDA to arrange for an inspection of the OSR site gifted by M/s. J.K. Properties in their Layout site namely “Sri Sai Nagar” project in S.Nos.159, 160, etc. of Ottiyambakkam Village, Tambaram Taluk (formerly Sholinganallur Taluk), Chengalpattu District (formerly Kancheepuram District), Chennai-130 approved by CMDA vide CMDA layout PPD/LO No.36/2020 in Letter No.L1/19681/2018- 19 dated 18.05.2020. Originally the land was gifted to Localbody as OSR. Now the Association in this project has complained that the OSR land is encroached by the Respondent Builder and used for other purposes. Therefore, the Member-Secretary, CMDA may arrange for conducting an inspection of the OSR site as to whether the OSR site gifted is being used as OSR or used for any other purpose by the Builder and submit a report to this Authority on or before 23.10.2024 after due verification. The District Collector concerned may also give direction to the officials of the concerned Localbody to take necessary action whether the land gifted to the Localbody namely the St. Thomas Mount Panchayat is being used as OSR or used for any other purpose as there is a complaint by the Association of this project that the Respondent Builder has encroached the OSR land and used for other purposes. If it is so, the land may be retrieved and maintained as OSR and inform the same to this Authority on or before 23.10.2024. Posted to 23.10.2024.
Next: 23 Oct 2024
-
28 Aug 2024 Cause list, item 13
-
7 Aug 2024 Case diary, item 14
C.42/2024
Complainants party in person present. The Counsel for the Respondent-2 present The parties filed Joint Compromise Memo in all the Complaints and the same is recorded. Accordingly the Complaint Nos.39, 46, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78 of 2024 and C.Nos.82, 83, 84 & 85 of 2024 are closed as settled. The Counsel for Complainants present. The Counsel for the Respondent-1 present and undertake to file vakalat. The parties report of impending settlement. Posted to 28.08.2024 for reporting settlement or Counter finally. In the meantime the 2nd Respondent is restrained from interfering with the Complainants in taking possession of flats. The Complainants absent. The Counsel for the Respondent-1 present At the request of the Counsel for the Respondent-1, posted to 28.08.2024 for reporting settlement or Counter finally. Complainant party in person present. Counsel for Respondent present. Both the parties agreed for joint inspection to identify the defects and come back with their respective position and submit report of rectification carried out by the Respondent. Posted to 11.09.2024. Complainant absent The Counsel for Respondent present. At the request of the Counsel for Respondent posted to 28.08.2024 for filing Counter finally at cost Rs.2,500/- to be paid to the Chief Minister’s Relief Fund. The Counsel for Complainant present The Counsel for Respondent-1 present. The Counsel for Respondent-2 present. The Counsel for Respondent-1 seeks time for filing Counter. The Counsel for Respondent-2 seeks clarification in the cause list. The Counsel for Complainant shall file amended Complaint. Posted to 21.08.2024 for amended complaint by the Complainant and for filing Counter by the Respondent-1 Complainants absent The Counsel M/s.Tatva Legal for Respondent filed vakalat along with Board resolution which is recorded. Posted to 28.08.2024 for Counter finally. Complainants absent The Counsel M/s.Tatva Legal for Respondent filed vakalat along with Board resolution which is recorded. Posted to 28.08.2024 for Counter finally. The Counsel for Respondent present and filed common memo to adjourn the hearing of IAs which is recorded. The Counsel for the Complainant in C.No.32/2023 present In all other 3 matters, complainants absent Posted to 21.08.2024 for filing undertaking as stated in the Memo by the Respondent Counsel with copy served on the Complainants before 12.08.2024. The Counsel for the Complainant present The Representing Counsel for Respondent present and sought time to file set aside petition and for filing Counter. The written argument filed by the Complainant Counsel is recorded. Posted to 21.08.2024 for filing set aside petition and for filing Counter finally with cost Rs.10,000/- to be paid to the Chief Ministers Relief Fund.
Next: 21 Aug 2024, for filing set aside petition and for filing Counter finally with cost Rs
-
7 Aug 2024 Cause list, item 14
-
19 Jun 2024 Case diary, item 3
042/2024
The Counsel for the Complainant present For Respondent, the Counsel M/s.Mageshkumar filed vakalat which is recorded. Posted to 07.08.2024 for Counter finally.
Next: 7 Aug 2024, for Counter finally
-
19 Jun 2024 Cause list, item 3
Read from the cause lists and case diaries TN RERA publishes. A listing is a dispute being heard, not a finding; the final order, once passed, is the decision.
Ask the records, or walk the map.
LandLens One answers from Tamil Nadu land law itself, cited to the page, then acts on the registers. One Map lights them up on the parcel. Your history stays in one place across both.
YOU APPROVE ANY SPEND
*Some tools are free of charge, but you need a credit balance to use LandLens One and One Map chat.
