Complaint before the TN RERA Authority

C.No.42/2025

No final order yet Listed 11 times

Parties, as the latest list prints them

Complainant
1.Mr.Balaji, 2.Sasikala. M
Respondent
M/s.Ramky Wawoo Developers Private Limited.

Hearings, newest first

  1. 16 Sep 2026 Case diary, item 17

    The Counsel for the Complainants present. The Counsel for Respondent absent. The Authority observed that sufficient opportunities were already given to both parties for arguments. Therefore the chance for arguments is closed. The Parties shall file written arguments if any within 2 weeks before the Registry. Orders reserved.

  2. 16 Sep 2026 Cause list, item 17

    C.No.42/2025 (Arguments)

    Listed for hearing (Arguments).

  3. 5 Aug 2026 Case diary, item 17

    Counsel for the Complainants present and again sought time for arguments. Counsel for Respondent present Posted to 16.09.2026 for arguments finally.

    Next: 16 Sep 2026, for arguments finally

  4. 5 Aug 2026 Cause list, item 17

    C.No.42/2025 (Arguments)

    Listed for hearing (Arguments).

  5. 29 Jun 2026 Case diary, item 12

    The counsel for the Complainants present and again sought time for arguments. The counsel for Respondent present Posted to 05.08.2026 for arguments.

    Next: 5 Aug 2026, for arguments

  6. 29 Jun 2026 Cause list, item 12

    C.No.42/2025 (Arguments)

    Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).

  7. 27 Apr 2026 Case diary, item 26

    The counsel for the Complainants present and again sought time for argument by their senior counsel. The counsel for Respondent present Posted to 29.06.2026 for arguments.

    Next: 29 Jun 2026, for arguments

  8. 27 Apr 2026 Cause list, item 26

    C.No.42/2025 (Arguments)

    Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).

  9. 30 Mar 2026 Case diary, item 15

    The representing counsel for the Complainants present and sought time for argument by their senior counsel who is not available today. The counsel for Respondent present The matter is adjourned to 27.04.2026 for arguments.

    Next: 27 Apr 2026, for arguments

  10. 30 Mar 2026 Cause list, item 15

    C.No.42/2025 (Arguments)

    Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).

  11. 16 Feb 2026 Case diary, item 17

    The Counsel for the Complainants present. The Counsel for Respondent present and submitted that they have filed Proof of Affidavit before the Registry today morning and served copy to Complainants. However, the Counsel for the Complainants submitted that they have received only copy of the Proof of Affidavit, and not the documents. The Respondent is directed to serve copy of the documents to the Complainants within one week from today. The matter is adjourned to 30.03.2026 for arguments.

    Next: 30 Mar 2026, for arguments

  12. 16 Feb 2026 Cause list, item 17

    C.No.42/2025 (Arguments)

    Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).

  13. 19 Jan 2026 Case diary, item 17

    The representing Counsel for the Complainants present. The Counsel for Respondent present and again sought time to file Proof of Affidavit. The Counsel for the Respondent is directed to file Proof of Affidavit within two weeks from today before the Registry and also serve copy to the Complainants by RPAD. The matter is adjourned to 16.02.2026 for arguments.

    Next: 16 Feb 2026, for arguments

  14. 19 Jan 2026 Cause list, item 17

    C.No.42/2025 (Arguments)

    Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).

  15. 17 Nov 2025 Case diary, item 18

    The representing Counsel for the Complainants present. The Counsel for Respondent present and filed Memo in compliance of the Authority’s order. The Counsel for the Respondent stated that the remaining set of keys pertaining to the Complainants’ apartment has been handed over on 01.11.2025 and that was also confirmed by the representing Counsel for the Complainants. The representing Counsel for the Complainants sought time to file Proof Affidavit. The Complainants are directed to file Proof Affidavit within two weeks from today in the Registry with copy served to the Respondent by RPAD. Posted to 19.01.2026 for arguments.

    Next: 19 Jan 2026, for arguments

  16. 17 Nov 2025 Cause list, item 18

    C.No.42/2025 (Arguments)

    Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).

  17. 27 Oct 2025 Case diary, item 6

    The Counsel for the Complainants present. The Counsel for Respondent present and already filed Counter in the Registry. The Counsel for the Complainants submitted that the Respondent is yet to handover remaining set of keys of their apartment. The Respondent is directed to handover the remaining set of keys of the apartment of the Complainants on or before 15.11.2025 without any lapse. Posted to 17.11.2025 for reporting compliance of the above interim direction and for arguments.

    Next: 17 Nov 2025, for reporting compliance of the above interim direction and for arguments

  18. 27 Oct 2025 Cause list, item 6

    Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M..

  19. 22 Sep 2025 Case diary, item 6

    The Counsel for the Complainant present. The Respondent called absent. Today the hearing is posted for filing Counter by Respondent. As the Respondent is called absent, the Authority directs the Respondent to file Counter within two weeks from today before the Registry, failing which a cost of Rs.5,000/- will be imposed on the Respondent which will be paid to CM Relief Fund. The copy of the Counter shall also be served to the Complainants by RPAD. Posted to 27.10.2025.

    Next: 27 Oct 2025

  20. 22 Sep 2025 Cause list, item 6

    Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M..

  21. 3 Sep 2025 Case diary, item 3

    The Counsel for the Complainants present The Counsel M/s. Mohammed Fayaz Ali for Respondent present and filed vakalat and sought time to file Counter. Posted to 22.09.2025 for filing Counter by Respondent by serving copy to the Complainants.

    Next: 22 Sep 2025, for filing Counter by Respondent by serving copy to the Complainants

  22. 3 Sep 2025 Cause list, item 3

    C.No.42/2025 (NEW)

    Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (New).

Read from the cause lists and case diaries TN RERA publishes. A listing is a dispute being heard, not a finding; the final order, once passed, is the decision.