Complaint before the TN RERA Authority
C.No.44/2025
Parties, as the latest list prints them
- Complainant
- Ramaniyum Ocean Dew Phase-2 Apartment Owners Association
- Respondent
- 1.Ramaniyam Ocean Promoters and Developers. 2.Ramaniyam Real Estates (P) Ltd. 3.Ocean Lifespaces India Pvt Ltd. 4.Ramaniyam Ocean Dew Owner Welfare Association
Hearings, newest first
-
4 Nov 2026 Cause list, item 9
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M.
-
21 Sep 2026 Case diary, item 8
44/2025
Counsel for the Complainant present Counsel for the Respondents-1 to 3 present. Counsel for 4th Respondent present and filed an IA along with typed set document by serving copy to the other sides. The counsel for the complainant submitted that they will share the maintenance charges and sought time so that they can have discussion with the Phase-1 Association the 4th Respondent herein on the sharing of maintenance charges and report to this Authority. At the request of the counsel for the Respondents-1 to 3, the Authority directs all the parties to sit together to decide the matter and report during next hearing. Posted to 04.11.2026 for further adjudication.
Next: 4 Nov 2026, for further adjudication
-
21 Sep 2026 Cause list, item 8
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M..
-
10 Aug 2026 Case diary, item 7
44/2025
Counsel for the Complainant present Respondents-1 to 3 called absent. Counsel for 4th Respondent present. Posted to 21.09.2026 for further adjudication.
Next: 21 Sep 2026, for further adjudication
-
10 Aug 2026 Cause list, item 7
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M..
-
13 Jul 2026 Case diary, item 10
44/2025
The Counsel for the Complainant present The Respondents-1 to 4 called absent. The matter is adjourned to 10.08.2026 for further adjudication.
Next: 10 Aug 2026, for further adjudication
-
13 Jul 2026 Cause list, item 10
Listed for hearing.
-
8 Jan 2026 Case diary, item 22
44/2025
The Counsel for the Complainant present and argued the case. The Counsel for Respondents-1 to 3 present and argued the case. The Counsel for Respondent-4 present and argued the matter. The counsel for Respondent-4 filed Memo along with copy of orders of the Principal District Judge, Chengalpattu in O.S.No.798 of 2025 dated 03.01.2026 wherein in para-17 the Hon’ble Principal District Court considering the fact that the TNRERA by its interim order dated 20.08.2025, directed the defendant members to allow ingress/egress and project site to the owners/visitors/guests of 7th Respondent members and also granting the order of status quo as on 20.08.2025 to be maintained till disposal of the subject matter. The Counsel for Complainant again sought that the interim direction issued by this Authority on 20.08.2025 shall continue till disposal of this Complaint. Therefore, the Authority reiterates that the interim direction to allow the Complainant to ingress and egress the project site is extended till disposal of this complaint. Reserved for orders on the IA.
-
8 Jan 2026 Cause list, item 22
-
18 Dec 2025 Cause list, item 21
-
10 Dec 2025 Cause list, item 21
C.No.44/2025 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
Next: 18 Dec 2025, reposted, as the list's notice says
Notice on this listOn Administrative grounds the following cases listed for hearing before Bench I on 10.12.2025 at 3.00P.M is re-posted to 18.12.2025 at 3.00 PM (Thursday) in New premises at Plot No.586,587 & 588, 1 st & 2 nd Avenue, Anna Nagar East, Chennai-600 102.
-
19 Nov 2025 Case diary, item 9
44/2025
The Counsel for the Complainant present and filed Memo. The Counsel for Respondents-1 to 3 present The Counsel for Respondent-4 present The Counsel for Complainant filed a Memo stating that the Hon’ble Principal District Court, Chengalpattu has granted an order of interim injunction in I.A.No.2 of 2025 in O.S.No.798 of 2025 against 4th Respondent on 24.10.2025 stating that the Respondents-1 to 6 are expected not to obstruct or interfere with the Petitioners, their employees/workers lawful rights of ingress egress through 200 feet radial road. The Counsel for Complainant pleaded that the interim direction issued by this Authority on 20.08.2025 shall continue till disposal of the Complaint. The interim direction to allow the Complainant to ingress and egress the project site is extended till disposal of the complaint. The case is adjourned to 10.12.2025 for arguments in IAs.
Next: 10 Dec 2025, for arguments in IAs
-
19 Nov 2025 Cause list, item 9
C.No.44/2025 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
27 Oct 2025 Case diary, item 13
44/2025
The Counsel for the Complainant present The Counsel for Respondents-1 to 3 present and again sought adjournment for oral submission of arguments. The Counsel for Respondent-4 present and submitted that the typed set documents have not been received from Respondents-1 & 3. The Respondents-1 & 3 directed to serve copy of the typed set documents to Respondent-4 by e-mail within one week. The case is posted to 19.11.2025 for arguments on the main case and on the IAs.
Next: 19 Nov 2025, for arguments on the main case and on the IAs
-
27 Oct 2025 Cause list, item 13
C.No.44/2025 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
22 Sep 2025 Case diary, item 18
44/2025
The Counsel for the Complainant present and filled common written arguments by serving copy to the other sides. The Counsel for Respondents-1 to 3 present and sought adjournment for making arguments and for filing written submission of arguments. The Counsel for Respondent-4 present and made detailed oral submissions and filed written submission of arguments with typed set documents by serving copy to the other sides. The interim direction to allow the Complainant to ingress and egress the project site is extended till disposal of the complaint. The case is posted to 27.10.2025 for arguments in IAs by the Respondents-1 to 3 and for filing written submission of arguments
Next: 27 Oct 2025, for arguments in IAs by the Respondents-1 to 3 and for filing written submission of arguments
-
22 Sep 2025 Cause list, item 18
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M..
-
8 Sep 2025 Case diary, item 5
44/2025
The Counsel for the Complainant present The Counsel for Respondents-1 to 3 present and filed Common Counter in IA Nos.61 to 65 along with typed set documents. The Counsel for Respondent-4 present and filed Counter in main case. The Authority directs the Respondent-4 to file Counter in IA before the Registry by serving copy to the other side. The interim direction to allow the Complainant to ingress and egress the project site is extended till next hearing. The case is posted to 22.09.2025 for arguments in IAs.
Next: 22 Sep 2025, for arguments in IAs
-
8 Sep 2025 Cause list, item 5
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M..
-
20 Aug 2025 Case diary, item 3
44/2025
The Counsel for the Complainant present The Counsel M/s.K.Jayasudha for Respondents-1 to 3 present and filed vakalat. The Counsel M/s.M. Marudhachalam for Respondent-4 present and filed vakalat. The Counsel for the Complainant prayed for an interim direction to Respondent-4 to allow them to ingress and egress the project site. The case is posted to 08.09.2025 for filing Counter by Respondents-1 to 3 and for filing Counter by Respondent-4 and to allow the Complainant to ingress and egress the project site till further orders.
Next: 8 Sep 2025, for filing Counter by Respondents-1 to 3 and for filing Counter by Respondent-4 and to allow the Complainant to ingress and
-
20 Aug 2025 Cause list, item 3
Read from the cause lists and case diaries TN RERA publishes. A listing is a dispute being heard, not a finding; the final order, once passed, is the decision.
Ask the records, or walk the map.
LandLens One answers from Tamil Nadu land law itself, cited to the page, then acts on the registers. One Map lights them up on the parcel. Your history stays in one place across both.
YOU APPROVE ANY SPEND
*Some tools are free of charge, but you need a credit balance to use LandLens One and One Map chat.
