Complaint before the TN RERA Authority
C.No.49/2025
Parties, as the latest list prints them
- Complainant
- K.M.Sathis Kumar,
- Respondent
- GP Homes Pvt.Ltd, Rep. By its MD,
Hearings, newest first
-
23 Sep 2026 Case diary, item 15
Counsel for the Complainant present Respondent called absent. The counsel for the complainant argued that the total sale consideration of the apartment is Rs.90.50 lakh which includes registration of UDS and building; utility charges; car parking charges and towards GST. The entire sale consideration has been paid to the Respondent and the Respondent has collected an excess amount of approx. Rs.9 lakh i.e. GST is not applicable to this ready built apartment; the purpose of utility charges is not stated anywhere in the agreement; excess stamp duty collected by the Respondent and the car parking charges is not included in the sale consideration. Therefore, the counsel for the Complainant prayed for refund of the excess amount collected by the Respondent and also to demarcate with correct dimension for covered car parking as per the approved plan. Both the parties already filed written submission of arguments. Reserved for orders.
-
23 Sep 2026 Cause list, item 15
-
12 Aug 2026 Case diary, item 23
Counsel for the Complainant present Respondent called absent. Posted to 23.09.2026 for arguments.
Next: 23 Sep 2026, for arguments
-
12 Aug 2026 Cause list, item 23
C.No.49/2025 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
1 Apr 2026 Case diary, item 17
The counsel for the Complainant present The counsel for the Respondent present Both the parties argued the matter. The Authority heard the parties and reserved for orders.
-
1 Apr 2026 Cause list, item 17
-
18 Feb 2026 Case diary, item 17
The counsel for the Complainant present and argued the matter. The counsel for the Complainant also filed written arguments and served copy to the counsel for the Respondent. The representing counsel for Respondent present and sought time for oral arguments by their senior counsel. The counsel for the Respondent filed written submission of arguments and served copy to the counsel for the Complainant. Posted to 01.04.2026 for arguments by Respondent’s side.
Next: 1 Apr 2026, for arguments by Respondent’s side
-
18 Feb 2026 Cause list, item 17
C.No.49/2025 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
7 Jan 2026 Case diary, item 22
The Counsel for the Complainant present. The Counsel for Respondent present and sought time for arguments. Posted to 18.02.2026 for arguments by both the parties.
Next: 18 Feb 2026, for arguments by both the parties
-
7 Jan 2026 Cause list, item 22
C.No.49/2025 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
17 Nov 2025 Case diary, item 10
49/2025
The Counsel for the Complainant present. The Counsel for Respondent present and already filed Counter with typed set documents in the Registry along with cost paid Memo. Also the Respondent submitted that they have already served the copy of the Counter with typed set documents to the Complainant through e-mail. The Counse for the Complainant sought time for arguments. Posted to 07.01.2026 for arguements.
Next: 7 Jan 2026, for arguements
-
17 Nov 2025 Cause list, item 10
C.No.49/2025 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
13 Oct 2025 Case diary, item 8
49/2025
The Counsel for the Complainant present. The Counsel M/s. K.Shanmugam for Respondent present and filed vakalat and sought time to file Counter. The Respondent was directed to file vakalat along with Counter by 13.10.2025, however, the Respondent has not filed the Counter today and sought time to file Counter. The Authority imposes cost of Rs.2,500/- on the Respondent which shall be paid to CM Relief Fund and file Counter within two weeks before the Registry along with cost Memo. Also copy of the Counter shall be served to the Complainant by RPAD as well as through e-mail. Posted to 17.11.2025 for arguements.
Next: 17 Nov 2025, for arguements
-
13 Oct 2025 Cause list, item 8
Listed for hearing.
-
8 Sep 2025 Case diary, item 2
49/2025
The Counsel for the Complainant present. The Counsel M/s. K.Shanmugam for Respondent present and undertook to file vakalat and Counter. Posted to 13.10.2025 for filing vakalat and Counter by Respondent.
Next: 13 Oct 2025, for filing vakalat and Counter by Respondent
-
8 Sep 2025 Cause list, item 2
Read from the cause lists and case diaries TN RERA publishes. A listing is a dispute being heard, not a finding; the final order, once passed, is the decision.
Ask the records, or walk the map.
LandLens One answers from Tamil Nadu land law itself, cited to the page, then acts on the registers. One Map lights them up on the parcel. Your history stays in one place across both.
YOU APPROVE ANY SPEND
*Some tools are free of charge, but you need a credit balance to use LandLens One and One Map chat.