Complaint before the TN RERA Authority
C.No.58/2025
Parties, as the latest list prints them
- Complainant
- Tmt. Saranya Jeyasundaram Represented by Power of Attorney Thiru A.G. Shanmuganathan
- Respondent
- 1)M/s. KG Foundations (P) Ltd. 2)KG Chandravista Owners Residents Association Represented by its President
Hearings, newest first
-
27 Jul 2026 Case diary, item 28
Counsel for Complainant present. Counsel for the Respondent-1 present and filed counter to the additional documents filed by the complainant and written arguments. Respondent-2 already set as ex-parte. Heard arguments of both parties. Reserved for orders.
-
27 Jul 2026 Cause list, item 28
-
22 Jun 2026 Case diary, item 23
The representing counsel for the Complainant along with complainant present. The counsel for the Respondent-1 present and undertook to file response to the documents submitted by the Complainant along with their written submission of arguments. The Respondent-1 is directed to file their response along with written submission of arguments within two weeks from today before the Registry by serving copy to the Complainant by RPAD. The Respondent-2 already treated as ex-parte. Posted to 27.07.2026 for arguments by Respondent-1 finally.
Next: 27 Jul 2026, for arguments by Respondent-1 finally
-
22 Jun 2026 Cause list, item 23
C.No.58/2025 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
29 Apr 2026 Case diary, item 24
The counsel for Complainant present and argued the matter. The counsel for the Respondent-1 present and sought time for arguments. The Respondent-2 already treated as ex-parte. The counsel for the complainant is directed to file written submission of arguments along with documents, if any, within two weeks before the Registry by serving copy to the Respondent-1 by RPAD. Posted to 22.06.2026 for arguments by the Respondent-1 finally.
Next: 22 Jun 2026, for arguments by the Respondent-1 finally
-
29 Apr 2026 Cause list, item 24
C.No.58/2025 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
23 Mar 2026 Case diary, item 23
The representing counsel for Complainant present and sought time to argue the matter as their senior counsel is not available to argue the case today. The counsel for the Respondent-1 present. The Respondent-2 already treated as ex-parte. Posted to 29.04.2026 for arguments finally.
Next: 29 Apr 2026, for arguments finally
-
23 Mar 2026 Cause list, item 23
-
9 Feb 2026 Case diary, item 17
The Counsel for Complainant present The Counsel for the Respondent-1 present. In spite of having served private notice, the Respondent-2 has not turned up for the hearing on 07.01.2026 and today also called absent. Therefore, the Respondent-2 is treated ex-parte. Posted to 23.03.2026 for arguments.
Next: 23 Mar 2026, for arguments
-
9 Feb 2026 Cause list, item 17
-
7 Jan 2026 Case diary, item 21
The Counsel for Complainant present and filed Affidavit of Service to Respondent-2. The Counsel for the Respondent-1 present and already filed Counter. In spite of having served private notice, the Respondent-2 not appeared in this hearing. Posted to 09.02.2026 for filing Counter by Respondent-2.
Next: 9 Feb 2026, for filing Counter by Respondent-2
-
7 Jan 2026 Cause list, item 21
-
17 Nov 2025 Case diary, item 4
58/2025
The Counsel for Complainant along with Complainant present The Counsel M/s. Deepak Narayanan for the Respondent present and filed vakalat and sought time to file Counter. Respondent-2 called absent Respondent-1 is directed to file Counter within one week from today in the Registry, failing which cost of Rs.5,000/- will be imposed to be paid to CM Relief Fund. Also serve copy of the Counter to the Complainant by RPAD. The Complainant is directed to take private notice to Respondent-2 and file affidavit of service with the Registry. Posted to 07.01.2026 for arguments.
Next: 7 Jan 2026, for arguments
-
17 Nov 2025 Cause list, item 4
-
8 Oct 2025 Case diary, item 3
58/2025
The Counsel M/s.S.Santhosh Kumar for Complainant present and filed vakalat. The Counsel M/s. Deepak Narayanan for the Respondent present and undertook to file vakalat and sought time to file Counter. It is noticed from the records that this project is not registered with TNRERA. However, the Counsel for the Complainant sought time to file amended complaint including the prayer to direct the Respondent to register this project with TNRERA. The Complainant is at liberty to file the amended complaint before the Registry by serving copy to the Respondent by RPAD. Posted to 17.11.2025 for filing vakalat and Counter by the Respondent.
Next: 17 Nov 2025, for filing vakalat and Counter by the Respondent
-
8 Oct 2025 Cause list, item 3
Read from the cause lists and case diaries TN RERA publishes. A listing is a dispute being heard, not a finding; the final order, once passed, is the decision.
Ask the records, or walk the map.
LandLens One answers from Tamil Nadu land law itself, cited to the page, then acts on the registers. One Map lights them up on the parcel. Your history stays in one place across both.
YOU APPROVE ANY SPEND
*Some tools are free of charge, but you need a credit balance to use LandLens One and One Map chat.
