Complaint before the TN RERA Authority
C. No. 60/2023
Parties, as the latest list prints them
- Complainant
- M/s. BPCL Staff Residence Welfare Society Rep. by its Secretary, Thiru Ezhilan
- Respondent
- 1) M/s. Lakshmi Royal Home Constructions & 18 others
Hearings, newest first
-
28 Sep 2026 Case diary, item 29
Counsel for Complainant present. Counsel for Respondents-1, 3, 4 and 7 present. Respondent-2 called absent. Counsel for Respondent-5 present Respondents-6 & 8 called absent Counsel for proposed 9th Respondent present. Counsel for Respondents-10 to 15 present Respondent-16 called absent Counsel for Respondents-17 to 19 called absent during calling hours and appeared belatedly. The Authority heard the parties. During last hearing the Authority directed the Complainant and the Respondents to file Terms of Reference for the appointment of Auditor for Forensic Audit and Engineer to arrive at the cost of completion within two weeks before the Registry. However, only the complainant; 5th Respondent and 9th Respondent have filed TOR before the Registry. Therefore, all the remaining Respondents are directed to file their response on the TOR within two weeks before the Registry by serving copy to other side so as to arrive at a solution on a time bound manner. Reserved orders on the Terms of Reference.
-
28 Sep 2026 Cause list, item 29
-
5 Aug 2026 Case diary, item 6
The Complainant Counsel present. The Counsel for Respondents-1, 3, 4 and 7 present. The Counsel for Respondent-2 present. The Counsel for Respondent-5 present The Respondents-6 & 8 called absent. The Counsel for 9th respondent present. Counsel for Respondents-10 to 15 present Counsel for Respondent-16 present Respondents-17 to 19 called absent. All the parties made their detailed submissions. The Authority directs all the Respondents to file their counter in respect of impleading petitions filed by the Complainant Association within two weeks before the Registry and serve copy to other sides. After hearing all the parties, the Authority directs both the Complainant and the Respondents to file Terms of Reference for the appointment of Auditor for Forensic Audit and Engineer to arrive at the cost of completion within two weeks before the Registry. Posted to 28.09.2026 for further adjudication.
Next: 28 Sep 2026, for further adjudication
-
5 Aug 2026 Cause list, item 6
-
28 Jul 2026 Cause list, item 1
C.No.60/2023
Listed for hearing.
Notice on this listPostponed due to Administrative reasons. The matters are reposted for hearing on the dates mentioned in column No. 5 below will be held in TNRERA Office,”RERA Tower” 4 th Floor “A” Wing at No.133, G-Block, 1 st Avenue, Anna Nagar (East), Chennai-600 102 . 1 2 3 4 5
-
7 Jul 2026 Case diary, item 1
The counsel for the Complainant present The counsel for the Respondents-1, 3, 4 and 7 present The counsel for the Respondent-2 present The counsel for the 5th Respondent present. The Respondents-6 & 8 called absent. The counsel for the impleaded 9th Respondent present. The counsel for Respondents-10 to 16 present. The Respondents-17 to 19 called absent. The counsel for the Respondents-1, 3, 4 & 7 filed revised proposal to complete the project by serving copy to the counsel for the Complainant and other Respondents. They have also filed additional typed set of documents wherein they have listed out certain disputed units/other units for which no documents were handed over. The learned counsel for the Complainant submitted that these documents/details should be available with the Respondent-1 being the promoter, however, the Complainant and other Respondents who have been allotted these apartments submitted that they will provide the available details/documents. The learned counsel for the Complainant desired to file six new impleading petitions, which they shall file before the Registry by serving copy to other side. The counsel for the Complainant also submitted that an independent civil engineer preferably from Anna University or IIT Madras may be appointed to vet the estimate prepared by the engineers of the Respondent promoter to complete the project. The Respondent promoter also agreed to the suggestion of the Complainant. Accordingly, the Authority directs the Registry to address the HOD, Civil Engineering Dept., Anna University to appoint a civil engineer to vet the estimate prepared by the Respondent-1. The Respondent-1 is directed to list out the pending works and detailed cost estimate and serve the same to the Complainant and other Respondents. The fee to the independent engineer appointed by the Anna University to be borned by all the parties as in the case of appointment of Chartered Accountant. The counsel for the Respondent-9 submitted a memo stating that several apartments belonging to 9th Respondent have not been taken into account by the Committee of Advocates and the copy of the memo has been shared to the Complainant and other Respondents. The matter is adjourned to 28.07.2026 for further adjudication.
Next: 28 Jul 2026, for further adjudication
-
7 Jul 2026 Cause list, item 1
-
2 Jun 2026 Case diary, item 1
The counsel for the Complainant present The counsel for Respondents-1, 3, 4 and 7 present The counsel M/s. K.S. Theerthaa for Respondent-2 present and undertook to file vakalat. The counsel for the 5th Respondent present. The Respondents-6 & 8 called absent. The impleaded Respondent-9 called absent. The counsel for Respondents-10 to 16 present. The Respondents-17 to 19 called absent. The counsel for the Respondents-1, 3, 4 & 7 presented a proposal regarding the completion of the project. The Respondent has indicated the amount required for completing the project including the liabilities in the said proposal. Also, it is seen from the proposal that the receivables are not adequate to meet the commitment. The Complainant Association and other Respondents disputed the receivables as indicated in the proposal and also raised doubt about the cost of construction indicated in the proposal by the Respondent-1. After detailed deliberations, it is felt that a qualified Chartered Accountant should review the proposal and verify various expenditure and receivable entries in the proposal with the books of accounts of the Respondent-1. The scope of work of the Chartered Accountant will cover (i) to verify the statement of funds required for completion of the project as indicated in page No.6 of the proposal submitted by the Respondent-1, which also include the liabilities towards M/s.Sivaji & Co. and M/s.CAPRI; the amount required to clear all dues related to the construction of the project; refund to the allottees who have sought refund; and the amount required for completion of the remaining works in the project. (ii) to verify the total amount invested by M/s.CAPRI and M/s. Sivaji & Co. and application of that amount; (iii) to check the receivables indicated in page No.7 of the proposal submitted by the Respondent-1 with respect to the respective agreements and payment made by the allottees including the allottees of EWS houses. While arriving the receivables from various allottees, the Chartered Accountant should rely on the agreements between the promoter and the allottees and the actual amount received from the allottees as per the books of accounts. During the discussion, it was pointed out by the learned counsel for the Complainant Association that 11 apartments allotted to the members of the Complainant Association have been pledged with M/s.CAPRI by the Respondent-1 and the amount received from M/s.CAPRI towards these 11 apartments should also be looked into by the Chartered Accountant. The learned counsel for the Respondent-1 stated that this number is 9 only. Further, it is also noticed from the proposal that another 10 apartments belonging to other allottees have also been pledged with M/s.CAPRI. The amount received by pledging these 21 apartments (11+10) should also be checked by the Chartered Accountant and also to verify whether any money has been raised by pledging any other apartments in this project. After reviewing the proposal and verifying the expenditure and receivable entries, the Chartered Account should indicate the net amount required to complete the project. With respect to the total amount required to complete the project, the Chartered Account shall rely on the estimate given by the qualified Engineer/Engineering firm. To this effect, the Respondent-1 shall get a detailed estimate from the reputed engineering firm and make it available to the Chartered Accountant by sharing copy to the Complainant Association and other Respondents and also to this Authority. The Registry is directed to get a panel of Chartered Accountants from the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and one of those Chartered Accountants can be appointed by this Authority to carry out this task. The cost has to be shared equally by the Respondent-1 and the allottees. The 50% of the fees to be borne by the allottees to be shared by the Complainant Association and other allottees proportionately. During last hearing, the Authority had also directed the Respondent-1 to re-submit the list of 252 allottees of this project. Accordingly, the Respondent-1 has submitted a list of 252 allottees and the copy of which has been made available to the Complainant Association and other Respondents. On cursory review of the list, it is noticed that still there are some gaps in the list. Therefore, the Authority directs the Committee of Advocates set up by this Authority earlier, to sit together and reconcile this list and arrive at the final list of allottees of 252 apartments. In case, an apartment has been allotted to more than one allottee, the details of those allottees with the basis of allotment shall be indicated against that apartment. Similarly, if an apartment allotted to a particular allottee has been re-allotted to someone else due to cancellation by the original allottee that may also be indicated against that particular apartment. Like-wise, an appropriate mention may also be made in case of the apartment where the allottees have sought refund. In a nutshell, the final list should cover all the 252 apartments with present status of allotment. After detailed discussion, the counsels of all the parties have consented to have the meeting of the Advocate Committee on 15.06.2026 at 3.00 p.m. at 4th floor, B-wing, Conference Hall, TNRERA office. The Law Officer of this Authority will be the Convenor for the above said Advocate Committee meeting. In the meantime, all the learned counsels will go through the list provided by the Respondent-1 and the Complainant Association. After the meeting of the Advocate Committee on 15.06.2026, the Authority would like to be briefed about the progress of the meeting on any working day convenient to the parties. The matter is adjourned to 07.07.2026 for further adjudication.
Next: 7 Jul 2026, for further adjudication
-
2 Jun 2026 Cause list, item 1
-
28 Apr 2026 Cause list, item 1
C.No.60/2023
Listed for hearing.
Next: 2 Jun 2026, reposted, as the list's notice says
Notice on this list(Reposted to 02.06.2026) The List of cases listed for hearing before I Bench on 28.04.2026 at 3.00 P.M. have been reposted on administrative grounds to 02.06.2026 at 3.00 P.M will be held in New premises TNRERA Office,”RERA Tower” 4 th Floor “A” Wing at No.133, G- Block, 1 st Avenue, Anna Nagar (East), Chennai-600 102 .
-
7 Apr 2026 Case diary, item 1
The Counsel for the Complainant present The Counsel for Respondents-1, 3, 4 and 7 present The Counsel for Respondent-2 present The Respondents-6 & 8 present. The Counsel for the 5th Respondent present. The Counsel for impleaded Respondent-9 present. The Counsel for Respondents-10 to 16 present. The Counsel for Respondents-17 to 19 present. During last hearing, the Authority had set up a Committee of Advocates to discuss various issues relating to this project and find a mutually agreeable solution. The said Committee met on 07.03.2026, but could not arrive at any decision as can be seen from the minutes of the Advocate Committee meeting. After hearing the views of various parties, the Authority observed that it is the responsibility of the Respondent-1 promoter to complete the project and handover the possession of the apartments allotted to the members of the complainant association as well as to other allottees. Therefore, the Authority directs the Respondent-1 to submit a detailed proposal for completion of the project as to how the Respondent-1 is going to complete the project. This proposal should include the requirement of funds to develop and complete the project and how the funds would be mobilized; modus operandi to implement the balance project work; and timeline for completion of the project. The learned counsel for Respondent-1 undertook to submit the proposal within three weeks from today in the Registry. The Respondent-1 has submitted the list of 252 allottees of the project. On perusal of this list, it is noticed that 56 EWS apartments are shown as single entry. The learned counsel for the Respondent-1 clarified that there is no proposal to construct EWS houses in the project, as in lieu of EWS houses, fee towards ‘Shelter Fund’ has been remitted. The counsel for the Respondent-1 has further submitted that these houses are yet to be allotted. Further in respect of 56 EWS houses, not much progress has been made on the ground. The counsel for the Respondent-1 also submitted that there are 7 towers comprising of 196 apartments, which are at various stages of implementation. The counsel for the Respondent-1 is directed to re-submit the list of 252 apartments and the allottees of this project by segregating them in various categories such as Part-1 – 120 apartments allotted to the members of the Complainant Association; Part-2 – 29 apartments allotted to Respondents- 10 to 16; Part-3 – apartments allotted to Respondents-17 to 19; Part-4 – Other allottees of the 7 towers; and Part-5 – allottees of 56 EWS houses. In case, a house has been allotted to more than one allottee, the details may be provided against that entry. Similarly, if the apartment allotted to a particular allottee has been re-allotted to someone else due to cancellation by the original allottee that may also be indicated in the entry of that particular apartment. Similarly, an appropriate mention may be made in case of the apartment where the allottees have sought refund. The tower number and its present status may also be given. The matter is adjourned to 28.04.2026 for further adjudication.
Next: 28 Apr 2026, for further adjudication
-
7 Apr 2026 Cause list, item 1
-
25 Feb 2026 Case diary, item 19
The Counsel for the Complainant present The Counsel for Respondents-1, 3, 4 and 7 present The Counsel for Respondent-2 present The Respondents-6 & 8 called absent. The Counsel for the 5th Respondent present. The Counsel for impleaded Respondent-9 present. The Counsel for Respondents-10 to 16 present. The Counsel for Respondents-17 to 19 present. 1. After hearing the learned counsels of all the parties and after consulting with them, the Authority decided to form a Committee of Advocates comprising of the following advocates to discuss various issues relating to this project and find a mutually agreeable solution. 1. Tmt. Akila Rajendiran & Thiru R. Sivam, Advocates representing Complainant Association. 2. Thiru N.Pranav Menon & Thiru Ramakrishnan, Advocates representing R-1, 3, 4 & 7. Tmt. Gurmit Kaur, Advocate representing R-5 Thiru N.P.Vijayakumar & Thiru R.Pradeep, Advocates representing R-9 Thiru Rishab R. Jain, Advocate representing R-10 to R-15 Thiru Pranav Reddy, Advocate representing R-16 Thiru R. Ganesh Ram, Advocate representing R-17 to R-19 2. The Committee of Advocates shall also identify the legitimate allottees for each of the 252 apartments. I th i d li ti th In case there is any duplication are more than one claimant/allottee for an apartment that should be identified and, in such cases, the first buyer will have the right provided the required amount has been paid. In case the first allottee is not willing to take the apartment, then the 2nd allottee should have the right over that apartment provided he has paid required amount. 3. The learned counsel for the complainant submitted that 11 apartments originally allotted to the members of the complainant association have been conveyed to the Respondent-5 and these apartments have to be re-conveyed to the original allottees. The learned Counsel for Respondents-1, 3, 4 and 7 submitted that they are ready to discuss with the Complainant Association and also ready to release these 11 apartments provided the money paid for these apartments is repaid, for that the funds have to be mobilized and that is possible when the project is completed. The Authority observed that the Committee of Advocates may discuss and come out with a solution as to how the money borrowed against these apartments will be refunded to Respondent-5 (M/s. Capri Global Capital Limited) so that these apartments can be conveyed to original allottees. 4. The learned Counsel for the complainant also submitted that eight members of the complainant association have requested for refund that issue also to be taken for discussion by the Committee. 5. The Authority decided that the Committee of Advocates should frame various issues relating to this project including those mentioned above and arrive at an amicable solution and suggest way forward to complete the project. 6. The first sitting of the Committee of Advocates will take place on 7th March, 2026 at 11.00 a.m. at 4th floor, B-wing, Conference Hall, TNRERA. 7. The Law Officer, TNRERA will co-ordinate and shall extend necessary logistic support. 8. The matter is adjourned to 27.03.2026 at 3.00 p.m.
Next: 27 Mar 2026
-
25 Feb 2026 Cause list, item 19
C.No.60/2023 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
8 Jan 2026 Case diary, item 2
The representing Counsel for Complainant present The Counsel for Respondents-1, 3, 4 and 7 present and filed additional typed set documents and served copy to the Complainant Counsel. The Respondents-6 & 8 called absent The Counsel for the 5th Respondent present. The Counsel for impleaded Respondents-9 to 15 present. The Counsel for Respondent-16 present. The Counsel for Respondents-17 to 19 present. The Authority directs the impleaded Respondents-9 to 19 to file Counter in the main case as well as their objection if any, on the additional typed set documents filed today by the Respondents-1, 3, 4 and 7 within two weeks from today before the Registry and serve copy to the other side by RPAD as well as through e-mail. Posted to 25.02.2026 for arguments.
Next: 25 Feb 2026, for arguments
-
8 Jan 2026 Cause list, item 2
-
18 Dec 2025 Cause list, item 22
-
11 Dec 2025 Cause list, item 19
C.No.60/2023
Listed for hearing at 4.00 P.M..
Next: 18 Dec 2025, reposted, as the list's notice says
Notice on this listOn Administrative grounds the following cases listed for hearing before Bench I on 11.12.2025 at 3.00P.M is re-posted to 18.12.2025 at 4.00 PM (Thursday) in New premises at Plot No.586,587 & 588, 1 st & 2 nd Avenue, Anna Nagar East, Chennai-600 102.
-
11 Dec 2025 Cause list, item 19
C.No.60/2023
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M..
Notice on this liston 26.11.2025 at 3.00P.M is re-posted to 11.12.2025 at 3.00 PM (Thursday) in New premises at Plot No.586,587 & 588, 1 st & 2 nd Avenue, Anna Nagar East, Chennai-600 102.
-
15 Oct 2025 Case diary, item 21
The Complainant Counsel present The Counsel for Respondents-1, 3, 4 and 7 present The Counsel for Respondent-2 present The Counsel for Respondent-5 present. The Counsel for impleaded 9th Respondent present The Respondents-10 to 15 and 17 to 19 present The Respondents-6, 8 and 16 called absent The Authority heard all the parties and directs the Respondents-1, 3, 4 and 7 to provide the list of 252 allottees of this project within two weeks with the Registry and copy served to the Complainant Association and all other Respondents by RPAD as well as through e-mail. Posted to 26.11.2025 for further proceedings.
Next: 26 Nov 2025, for further proceedings
-
15 Oct 2025 Cause list, item 21
-
8 Sep 2025 Case diary, item 16
The Complainant Counsel present and filed tabular statement mentioning the dates and events. The Counsel for Respondents-1, 3, 4 and 7 present and filed index of additional typed set of documents. The Counsel for Respondent-2 present The Counsel for Respondent-5 present and filed Memo enclosing the orders of the Hon’ble High Court in W.P.No.30254/2025 dated 11.08.2025. The Counsel for impleaded 9th Respondent present The Respondents-6, 8 and 10 to 19 called absent The Authority heard all the parties and posted to 15.10.2025. In the meantime, the Authority directs the Complainant Association and the Respondents to settle the issues amicably and report to this Authority.
Next: 15 Oct 2025
-
8 Sep 2025 Cause list, item 16
-
11 Jun 2025 Case diary, item 31
C.No.60/2023
On 04.06.2025, the Counsel for the proposed 3rd parties in IA No.20 to 26 of 2025 mentioned that during the hearing of this case on 29.04.2025, the Authority also directed the Respondents/proposed Respondents not to create any further encumbrance, but the same is not reflected in the Day Order dated 29.04.2025. Hence, the Authority directed the Registry to list the case on 11.06.2025. Today 11.06.2025 the above case is posted for hearing. The Complainant Counsel present. The Counsel for Respondents-1, 3, 4 and 7 present. The Counsel for Respondent-5 present. The Counsel M/s. N.P.Vijaya Kumar for proposed 9th Respondent present and filed vakalat and Counter in the IA No.74/2025 filed by the Complainant with copy served on the Complainant. The Counsel for the proposed 3rd parties present in IA No.20 to 26 of 2025. The Counsel for proposed another 3rd parties present in IA No. 39 to 41 of 2025. All other Respondents called absent. The Authority heard all the parties and directs all the Respondents to file Counter in IA No.43/2025 filed by the Complainant Association for forensic audit within one week from today in the Registry by serving copy to the Complainant. The Authority also directs that the status quo already granted vide day order dated 05.09.2024 to be maintained till disposal of this complaint. Also the Authority directs the Respondents not to create any further encumbrance till further orders. Any lapse will be viewed very seriously by the Authority. The Authority has already directed the Respondent-5 and M/s. Sivaji and Co (Proposed 9th Respondent) not to do any construction activity till further orders. Orders reserved on all the IAs.
-
11 Jun 2025 Cause list, item 31
-
22 Jan 2025 Case diary, item 1
The Complainant Counsel present. The Counsel for Respondents-1 to 4 and 7 present The Counsel for Respondent-5 present. The Counsel for Respondent-8 present All other Respondents absent. The Counsel for Complainant filed written submission of arguments by serving copy to the other side which is recorded. The Counsel for the Respondents-1 to 4 and 7 filed additional typed set papers by serving copy to the other side which is recorded. The Counsel for the Complainant submitted that the Respondent has changed the builder without the consent of the allottees. The Authority takes serious view on this issue and directed the Respondent to take all possible steps to settle the issues amicably. The Authority also directs the Respondents to file Counter on the impleading petition filed by the Complainant. The Authority directs the 3rd Respondent Mr.D.V.Sudhakar to be present during next hearing or he shall authorise a responsible person who can take decision in this issue. The Authority heard all the parties and posted to 21.02.2025.
Next: 21 Feb 2025
-
22 Jan 2025 Cause list, item 1
-
13 Nov 2024 Case diary, item 28
The Complainant Counsel present. The Counsel for Respondents-1 to 4 and 7 present The Counsel for Respondent-5 present. All other Respondents absent. The Counsel for Complainant filed IA petition to implead a new builder. The Authority heard all the parties and adjourned the hearing to 22.01.2025.
Next: 22 Jan 2025
-
13 Nov 2024 Cause list, item 28
-
9 Oct 2024 Case diary, item 36
60/2023
The Complainant Counsel present. The Counsel for Respondents-1 to 4 and 7 present The Counsel for Respondent-5 present and filed a Memo along with order of the Hon’ble High Court of Madras in W.P.No.28079/2024 dated 20.09.2024 which is recorded All other Respondents absent The Authority heard all the parties and directed the Counsel for the Complainants Association to collect the details from the individual Allottees about the amount collected from each Allottees and receivables from each Allottees duly signed by each Allottees and handover the details to the erstwhile promoter as well as to the new Developer with copy marked to the 5th Respondent within 2 weeks from the date of this order. Posted to 13.11.2024.
Next: 13 Nov 2024
-
9 Oct 2024 Cause list, item 36
-
10 Sep 2024 Case diary, item 1
C.No.60/2023
The learned counsel for the applicant / complainant made a special mention in the open court on 10.09.2024 and filed a I.A. No. 69 of 2024 in the above complaint praying for stay the operation of notice of sale through private treaty issued by the 5th respondent published in the newspaper on 05.09.2024, pending disposal of the above complaint. The counsel for the complainant has attached a printout of notice to have been sent to the M/s. R & P Law Firm representing 5th respondent. This Authority by its order on 05.09.2024 has already passed direction to the parties that status quo to be maintained till the disposal of the complaint. On that day, the counsel for the 5th respondent was very much present during the hearing and they took cognizance of proceedings. Inspite of that the 5th respondent indulged in making publication of sale notice under SARFAESI Act for sale of the property. The orders passed on 04.04.2024, 03.07.2024, 05.09.2024 is reiterated with directions to maintain status quo which shall continued till the disposal of the complaint.
-
5 Sep 2024 Case diary, item 1
C.No.60/2023
The Complainant Counsel present. The Counsel for Respondents-1 to 4 and 7 present The Counsel for Respondent-5 present The Counsel for Respondent-8 present The matter came up for hearing today. The rival parties have informed of having moved closure to reaching a settlement to proceed the completion of the project. The respondents / promoters have assured of recommencing construction at the site after clearing the dues to the respondent 5. The respondents 1 to 4 and 7 would complete their part of the obligations including to start the construction by 30.09.2024 and enter into a MOU with the 4 parties including the complainant and the new builder. Posted to 26.09.2024 for reporting progress. The status quo shall be maintained till disposal of the complaint filed.
Next: 26 Sep 2024, for reporting progress
-
30 Aug 2024 Case diary, item 1
C.No.60/2023
Due to administrative reasons, the case posted on 30.08.2024 are reposted to 05.09.2024.
Next: 5 Sep 2024
-
27 Aug 2024 Case diary, item 1
C.No.60/2023
The Complainant Counsel present. The Counsel for Respondents-1 to 4 and 7 present The Counsel for Respondent-5 present The Counsel for Respondent-8 present The matter came up for hearing today. The rival parties could not reach settlement, however they agreed to take one more effort to work out on the proposal for completion of the project. Posted to 30.08.2024 for reporting settlement or argument. Proposal submitted by the rival parties is recorded.
Next: 30 Aug 2024, for reporting settlement or argument
-
16 Aug 2024 Case diary, item 1
C.No.60/2023
The Complainant Counsel present. The Counsel for Respondents-1 to 4 and 7 present The Counsel for Respondent-5 present The matter came up for hearing today. The rival parties agreed to share their proposal with regard to completion of the project hereafter including the financial implications involved within a week’s time. The Counsel for Respondents-1 to 4 and 7 also commits to making efforts to settle the 5th Respondent on the pending amount due to them. The action taken so far submitted by Respondents-1 to 4 & 7 is recorded. Posted to 27.08.2024 for compliance of the above proposal by the rival parties.
Next: 27 Aug 2024, for compliance of the above proposal by the rival parties
-
16 Aug 2024 Cause list, item 1
-
31 Jul 2024 Case diary, item 16
60/2023
Counsel for Complainant present. Counsel for Respondent-1 to 4 and 7 present. Counsel for Respondent-5 present. Counsel for Respondent-8 present. The Respondent-1 to 4 and 7 assured that he is making efforts to settle the issue with Respondent-5 which will facilitate to restart of the project before 15.08.2024. The Respondent-1 to 4 and 7 also assured the plan of work to settle all the dues to the Respondent-5 and will intimate to the Complainant as and when it is happened. The Respondents-1 to 4 and 7 also assured that the flats belongs BPCL Staff Residence Welfare Society which stands guaranteed to the Financier the Respondent-5 would be the first be settled and intimated to the Complainants.The Complainants prayed for being allowed to take the project forward by taking it away from the Respondent.The complainant shall prepare the work plan to way forward and submit to the next day i.e. 16.08.2024 in case the promoter fails to initiate the work. The issue would be taken forward thereafter and the contentions of the complainant would be considered. The Respondents-1 to 4 and 7 also assured that he would continue the work on daily basis allowing the complainant to make a mention any time the work stopped so that due remedy could be taken. The cost directed to pay by the Complainant is condoned.
Next: 16 Aug 2024
-
31 Jul 2024 Cause list, item 16
-
24 Jul 2024 Case diary, item 23
60/2023
Counsel for Complainant present. Counsel for Respondent present. Advance hearing petition filed by the Complainant. Allowed. Posted to 31.07.2024.
Next: 31 Jul 2024
-
3 Jul 2024 Case diary, item 24
C.No.60/2023
The Complainant Society has filed an Affidavit along with typed set documents wherein they have shown 19 Nos. of Allottees indicating respective flat Nos. on the basis of proof of construction agreement and other payment receipts. 2. On 02.07.2024, in the earlier hearing, the Counsel for the Complainant reported before this Authority that there are 20 Nos. of Allottees who are facing attachment of their respective flats under SARFAESI proceedings initiated by the 5th Respondent. 3. The representation of the Complainant on that day very much contravenes the Affidavit dated 03.07.2024. 4. This Authority expresses great displeasure for the mis- representation of the Complainant and imposes a cost of Rs.2,500/- on the Complainant on the basis of the Affidavit filed on 03.07.2024 by the Complainant Society. 5. The Authority observing the decision held in the case of Union Bank of India vs. Rajasthan Regulatory Authority as held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India hereby restrains the 5th Respondent from auctioning the following flat Nos. till further orders from this Authority. Sl.No. Flat No. Name of the person 1. A-401 Bharathwaj N 2. A-503 Ganesh Sivasubramaniam & Chithra Ramasubramaniam 3. A-504 T.V.Pandiyan 4. A-701 E.Raju & R. Karpagam 5. D-601 Rajaiyer Subramanian Krishna Sankan and Shanthi Krishna Sankar 6. F-301 Ezhilan S 7. F-303 Anitha Ramdass 8. G-104 Uma Swaminathan & R. Swaminathan 9. G-402 Kishore G (POA Ganesh Babu R) 10. G-704 V. Vinod Kumar & Usha Vinod Kumar 11. A-204 Srinivasan 12. B-202 Santhi Chandrasekaran 13. B-502 Shanthi Rajendran 14. B-504 K.Sheela Devi 15. B-603 Mrs.Amudha Senthilkumar & Mr.Senthilkumar 16. C-302 Murali Guliam Krishnaswamy and Jayanthi Murali 17. C-603 S.premavathi 18. D-201 K.Poonguzhali 19. D-303 K.Gurumurthy Posted to 07.08.2024.
Next: 7 Aug 2024
-
2 Jul 2024 Case diary, item 1
C.No.60/2023
Counsel for the Complainants present Counsel for Respondents-1 to 4 and 7 present Respondents-5 present. Counsel for Respondent 8 present. The list of 20 flats which have been allotted to the employees of M/s.BPCL Staff Residence Welfare Society which are falling in the list of flats under auction in the SARFAESI proceedings. Therefore, the 5th Respondent the financial institution is restrained from auctioning the following flat Nos. till further orders on this issue. Sl.No. Flat No. Name of the person 1. A-401 Bharathwaj N 2. A-503 Ganesh Sivasubramaniam & Chithra Ramasubramaniam 3. A-504 T.V.Pandiyan 4. A-701 E.Raju & R. Karpagam 5. D-601 Rajaiyer Subramanian Krishna Sankan and Shanthi Krishna Sankar 6. F-301 Ezhilan S 7. F-303 Anitha Ramdass 8. G-104 Uma Swaminathan & R. Swaminathan 9. G-402 Kishore G (POA Ganesh Babu R) 10. G-704 V. Vinod Kumar & Usha Vinod Kumar 11. A-204 Srinivasan 12. B-202 Santhi Chandrasekaran 13. B-502 Shanthi Rajendran 14. B-504 K.Sheela Devi 15. B-603 Mrs.Amudha Senthilkumar & Mr.Senthilkumar 16. C-302 Murali Guliam Krishnaswamy and Jayanthi Murali 17. C-603 S.premavathi 18. D-201 K.Poonguzhali 19. D-303 K.Gurumurthy 20. F-403 Hariharan Vishwanathan The Complainant shall file an Affidavit with regard to the 20 flats allotted to the employees of M/s.BPCL Staff Residence Welfare Society forming part of the SARFAESI proceedings before 12 Noon of 03.07.2024 with copy shared with the Respondents. The additional typed set documents filed by the Respondents-1 to 4 & 7 is recorded. Posted to 07.08.2024.
Next: 7 Aug 2024
-
5 Jun 2024 Case diary, item 29
60/2023
Counsel for the Complainants present Counsel for Respondents-1 to 4 and 7 present Counsel for Respondent 8 present. Respondents-5 present. The Counsel for the Respondents-1 to 4 and 7 argued and assured that SARFAESI proceedings initiated would be met by the Respondents and the Counsel also assured that he will come up with a report at next hearing which is on 02.07.2024 and report payment of the required dues to bring the property out of SARFAESI proceedings. the 1st Respondent also assured to provide time schedule for completion of the project beyond that date. Posted to 02.07.2024.
Next: 2 Jul 2024, for completion of the project beyond that date
-
26 Apr 2024 Case diary, item 29
60/2023
Counsel for the Complainants present Counsel for Respondents-1 to 4 and 7 present Counsel for Respondent 8 present. Respondents-5 and 6 absent. The Counsel for the Complainant argued and reiterated for freezing of escrow Bank Account with HDFC Bank. The Respondent-8 namely M/s. HDFC Bank is directed to freeze the Account No.57500000148882 forthwith pending disposal of this Complaint. The 5th Respondent shall await final disposal of this Complaint No.60/2023 before proceeding any charge against the Complainants’ share of units. The status quo shall be maintained by all the parties till disposal of this Complaint. Posted to 05.06.2024.
Next: 5 Jun 2024
-
4 Apr 2024 Case diary, item 37
60/2023
Counsel for the Complainants present Counsel for Respondents-1 to 4 and 7 present Counsel for Respondent-5 present and filed Additional Affidavit along typed set documents. Respondents-6 & 8 absent. At the request of the Complainants Counsel posted to 26.04.2024 for arguments finally, till such time status quo shall be maintained by all the parties.
Next: 26 Apr 2024, for arguments finally, till such time status quo shall be maintained by all the parties
The same complaint number was also listed before Single Member Bench.
Read from the cause lists and case diaries TN RERA publishes. A listing is a dispute being heard, not a finding; the final order, once passed, is the decision.
Ask the records, or walk the map.
LandLens One answers from Tamil Nadu land law itself, cited to the page, then acts on the registers. One Map lights them up on the parcel. Your history stays in one place across both.
YOU APPROVE ANY SPEND
*Some tools are free of charge, but you need a credit balance to use LandLens One and One Map chat.
