Complaint before the TN RERA Authority
C.No.09/2026
Parties, as the latest list prints them
- Complainant
- Rams Imperia Apartment Owners Association – Virugambakkam
- Respondent
- 1) Fourcee Housing 2) Vikram Chandiramani 3) C. Chandiramani 4) Rama Chandiramani 5) N.S. RadhakrishnanCr.Fd
Hearings, newest first
-
2 Nov 2026 Cause list, item 2
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M.
-
30 Sep 2026 Case diary, item 4
C.No.009/2026
Counsel for Complainant Association present and sought time to file response on the inspection report. Counsel for Respondents present. Posted to 02.11.2026 for filing response on the inspection report.
Next: 2 Nov 2026, for filing response on the inspection report
-
30 Sep 2026 Cause list, item 4
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M..
-
24 Aug 2026 Case diary, item 6
C.No.009/2026
Counsel for Complainant Associaction present and submitted that there are water seepage and leakage in the project, façade tiles are falling from the building due to defective construction, caving of paver blocks in certain locations causes hardship in the entire driveway and the statutory title and project documents have not yet been handed over to the Association. Respondents called absent. Posted to 30.09.2026 for filing response on the inspection report.
Next: 30 Sep 2026, for filing response on the inspection report
-
24 Aug 2026 Cause list, item 6
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M..
-
22 Jul 2026 Case diary, item 6
C.No.009/2026
Counsel for Complainant present Respondents called absent. Posted to 24.08.2026 for filing inspection report.
Next: 24 Aug 2026, for filing inspection report
-
22 Jul 2026 Cause list, item 6
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M..
-
20 Jul 2026 Cause list, item 2
C.No.009/2026
Listed for hearing.
Notice on this listpostponed due to administrative reasons. The matters are reposted for hearing on the dates mentioned in column No. 5 below will be held in TNRERA Office,”RERA Tower” 4 th Floor “A” Wing at No.133, G-Block, 1 st Avenue, Anna Nagar (East), Chennai-600 102 . 1 2 3 4 5
-
8 Jun 2026 Case diary, item 12
C.No.009/2026
The counsel for the Complainant present The counsel for the Respondents-1 to 5 present. The learned counsel for the Complainant submitted that the joint inspection was carried out and the report is submitted by the Respondent which was drafted by one of the site engineers. The Complainant does not agree with the report and accordingly they filed a memo objecting the inspection report. The counsel for the Complainant further submitted that this Authority may appoint an independent engineer to inspect the project and submit his report. The learned counsel for the Respondent submitted that he needs some more time to go through the report and talk to their client and get instruction regarding inspection by an independent engineer. The Authority observed that no prejudice would be caused to the Respondent if an independent engineer is appointed to inspect the project and submit a report. Therefore, decided to appoint an independent engineer to inspect the project and report the status of the project works with respect to the agreement between the parties. Accordingly, the Authority directs the Registry to appoint an independent engineer from the panel of engineers. A fee of Rs.30,000/- to be paid to the independent engineer for this assignment. The fee shall initially be borne by the Complainant. The complainant shall remit the fee with the Registry. On remittance of fee by the Complainant, the Registry shall appoint the independent engineer. The independent engineer shall inform both the parties in advance before undertaking the inspection so that the parties are available at the time of inspection by the independent engineer. In case the report of the independent engineer brings out any structural defects, in that situation the cost shall be reimbursed by the Respondent to the Complainant. Posted to 20.07.2026 for filing inspection report.
Next: 20 Jul 2026, for filing inspection report
-
8 Jun 2026 Cause list, item 12
-
20 Apr 2026 Case diary, item 13
C.No.009/2026
The counsel for the Complainant present The counsel for the Respondents-1 to 5 present. The counsel for the Respondents submitted that as agreed by both the parties during the previous hearing, a Joint Inspection was conducted and filed Joint Inspection report by serving copy to the counsel for the Complainant. The counsel for the Complainant expressed their objection on the joint inspection report and requested for inspection of an independent engineer. The Authority directs the Complainant to file a memo in this regard. Posted to 08.06.2026 for further adjudication.
Next: 8 Jun 2026, for further adjudication
-
20 Apr 2026 Cause list, item 13
-
30 Mar 2026 Case diary, item 7
C.No.009/2026
The Counsel for Complainant present and filed Memo by serving copy to the counsel for the Respondents. The counsel for the Respondents-1 to 5 present and sought time to file Counter. The counsel for the Complainant stated in the Memo that no action is taken by the Respondent with respect to the directions issued by this Authority during last hearing. To substantiate that, the Complainant has also attached some photographs in that Memo. Both the parties made their submissions and have agreed to have a joint inspection of the project site within 10 days and report the way forward to rectify the issues relating to falling of façade tiles and the water seepage issue. The Authority directs the Respondent to file Counter within a week along with documents, if any, before the Registry and serve copy to the Complainant by RPAD. Posted to 20.04.2026 for reporting the status of rectification of the issues relating to falling of façade tiles and water seepage.
Next: 20 Apr 2026, for reporting the status of rectification of the issues relating to falling of façade tiles and water seepage
-
30 Mar 2026 Cause list, item 7
-
16 Feb 2026 Case diary, item 1
C.No.009/2026
The Counsel for Complainant present The Counsel M/s. Varam Legal for the Respondents-1 to 5 present and filed vakalat and sought time for filing Counter. The learned Counsel for the Complainant submitted that the façade tiles are falling from the building and posing safety risk to the occupants and pleaded that the Authority may intervene and issue an interim direction to the Respondent to rectify the defect. The Authority directs the Respondent to immediately attend to the issue relating to falling of tiles, which, if not, attended may pose safety issue to the occupants and therefore, within 15 days this issue should be addressed by the Respondent. Posted to 30.03.2026 for filing Counter and reporting the status of rectification of issue relating to falling of façade tiles.
Next: 30 Mar 2026, for filing Counter and reporting the status of rectification of issue relating to falling of façade tiles
-
16 Feb 2026 Cause list, item 1
Read from the cause lists and case diaries TN RERA publishes. A listing is a dispute being heard, not a finding; the final order, once passed, is the decision.
Ask the records, or walk the map.
LandLens One answers from Tamil Nadu land law itself, cited to the page, then acts on the registers. One Map lights them up on the parcel. Your history stays in one place across both.
YOU APPROVE ANY SPEND
*Some tools are free of charge, but you need a credit balance to use LandLens One and One Map chat.
