Complaint before the TN RERA Authority
C.No.95/2022
Parties, as the latest list prints them
- Complainant
- 1. K.V. Balachander & 16 others
- Respondent
- M/s. Casa Grande Homes Pvt Ltd.
Hearings, newest first
-
26 Oct 2026 Case diary, item 25
Complainants called absent. Counsel for Respondent present and sought time for arguments. Posted to 25.11.2026 for arguments.
Next: 25 Nov 2026, for arguments
-
26 Oct 2026 Cause list, item 25
-
9 Sep 2026 Case diary, item 13
Counsel for Complainants present. Counsel for Respondent present. At the request of the both the Counsels, posted to 26.10.2026 for arguments.
Next: 26 Oct 2026, for arguments
-
9 Sep 2026 Cause list, item 13
C.No.95/2022 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
3 Aug 2026 Case diary, item 13
Counsel for Complainants present. Counsel for Respondent present and sought time for arguments. At the request of the Respondent posted to 09.09.2026 for arguments finally.
Next: 9 Sep 2026, for arguments finally
-
3 Aug 2026 Cause list, item 13
C.No.95/2022 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
29 Jun 2026 Case diary, item 16
The counsel for Complainants present. The counsel for Respondent present and filed Memo and served copy to the counsel for the Complainants. During last hearing, it was inadvertently mentioned by the Respondent that some of the documents have to be filed by them and sought one more chance to submit those documents. Today, the learned counsel for the Respondent submitted that such documents have already been filed before this Authority and further submitted that, that being the case the cost imposed by this Authority may be waived. On perusal of the day order dated 03.06.2026, it is noticed that the Respondent had only desired to file some documents and it was neither the Complainant nor the Authority who desired or directed the Respondent to file such documents. Therefore, the Authority did not agree with the suggestion of the learned counsel for the Respondent to waive the cost and directed that as suggested by the learned counsel when E.P.No.13/2025 in C.No.129/2023 was taken up for consideration, the cost of Rs.5,000/- paid additionally in the said E.P. may be adjusted towards the cost imposed in this complaint. The matter is adjourned to 03.08.2026 for arguments.
Next: 3 Aug 2026, for arguments
-
29 Jun 2026 Cause list, item 16
-
3 Jun 2026 Case diary, item 20
The counsel for Complainants present. The counsel for Respondent present and submitted that some of the documents are readily available except some documents and sought one more chance to submit these documents. The Authority already as a last chance directed the Respondent during last hearing on 08.04.2026 to file the documents within one week from 08.04.2026 before the Registry failing which a cost of Rs.5,000/- will be imposed on them payable to CM Relief fund. Considering the request of the Respondent and after consulting with the counsel for the Complainant, the Authority as a final chance grants two weeks time to the Respondent to file the documents before the Registry as already directed by this Authority during previous hearing with cost of Rs.5,000/- payable to CM Relief fund, failing which a cost of Rs.10,000/- will be imposed payable to CM Relief fund. The matter is adjourned to 29.06.2026 for arguments.
Next: 29 Jun 2026, for arguments
-
3 Jun 2026 Cause list, item 20
C.No.95/2022 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
8 Apr 2026 Case diary, item 5
The counsel for Complainants present. The counsel for Respondent present. During last hearing the Respondent sought time to file certain documents, however, they have failed to file the same and again sought time to file the documents relating to Anadheenam land, gifting of road land to Local Body and details regarding water supply, solar panel, etc. with documentary evidence. Therefore, the Respondent is directed to file the documents within one week from today with the Registry by serving copy to the complainants by RPAD, failing which a cost of Rs.5,000/- payable to CM Relief fund will be imposed. The matter is adjourned to 03.06.2026 for arguments.
Next: 3 Jun 2026, for arguments
-
8 Apr 2026 Cause list, item 5
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M..
-
23 Feb 2026 Case diary, item 11
The counsel for Complainants present and argued the matter. The counsel for Respondent present and argued the matter. The counsel for the Respondent sought time to address the issues relating to Anadheenam land, gifting of road land to Local Body and details regarding water supply, solar panel, etc. with documentary evidence. The matter is adjourned to 08.04.2026 for filing documents by the Respondent.
Next: 8 Apr 2026, for filing documents by the Respondent
-
23 Feb 2026 Cause list, item 11
C.No.95/2022 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
7 Jan 2026 Case diary, item 15
The Counsel for Complainants present The Counsel for Respondent present During last hearing both the Counsels submitted that settlement talks are going on the sought time to report settlement. Today, the Counsel for the complainants submitted that no settlement is arrived Therefore, the matter is adjourned to 23.02.2026 for arguments finally.
Next: 23 Feb 2026, for arguments finally
-
7 Jan 2026 Cause list, item 15
C.No.95/2022 (Arguments)
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M. (Arguments).
-
12 Nov 2025 Case diary, item 23
The Counsel for Complainants present The Counsel for Respondent present and submitted that they have communicated the draft for undertaking to be furnished by the Complainants. The Counsel for the complainants submitted that he has to get instruction from his client. Posted to 07.01.2026 for reporting settlement or for arguments finally.
Next: 7 Jan 2026, for reporting settlement or for arguments finally
-
12 Nov 2025 Cause list, item 23
-
3 Nov 2025 Case diary, item 10
The Counsel for Complainants present The Counsel for Respondent present During last hearing on 22.09.2025, the Respondent sought time to argue the matter as their Senior Counsel is out of station. Today also the Counsel for Respondent sought time for arguments as they are considering to file an undertaking to declare certain amenities developed by the Respondent in the Anadeenam land. Though the Authority ordered during last hearing that no further adjournment would be considered, however, at the request of the Counsel for Respondent, the Authority decided to give one more chance to the Respondent for oral submission of arguments. The matter is adjourned to 12.11.2025 for arguments by the Respondent finally and to file written submission of arguments by serving copy to the Complainants.
Next: 12 Nov 2025, for arguments by the Respondent finally and to file written submission of arguments by serving copy to the Complainants
-
3 Nov 2025 Cause list, item 10
-
22 Sep 2025 Case diary, item 23
The Counsel for Complainants present The representing Counsel for Respondent present and sought time to argue the matter as their Senior Counsel is out of station. The matter is adjourned to 03.11.2025 for arguments by the Respondent and to file written submission of arguments by serving copy to the Complainants. No more adjournment.
Next: 3 Nov 2025, for arguments by the Respondent and to file written submission of arguments by serving copy to the Complainants
-
22 Sep 2025 Cause list, item 23
Listed for hearing at 3.00 P.M..
The same complaint number was also listed before Single Member Bench.
Read from the cause lists and case diaries TN RERA publishes. A listing is a dispute being heard, not a finding; the final order, once passed, is the decision.
Ask the records, or walk the map.
LandLens One answers from Tamil Nadu land law itself, cited to the page, then acts on the registers. One Map lights them up on the parcel. Your history stays in one place across both.
YOU APPROVE ANY SPEND
*Some tools are free of charge, but you need a credit balance to use LandLens One and One Map chat.
