case law

Common Order in Miscellaneous Application Nos. 83 and 85 of 2020

The Tamil Nadu Real Estate Appellate Tribunal issued the Common Order in Miscellaneous Application Nos. 83 and 85 of 2020 on 17 December 2020. It conditionally allowed the developers’ applications against refund and compensation orders, requiring them to deposit 30% of the total amount ordered in each case by 10 January 2021, failing which the applications would automatically be dismissed.

Category
Tribunal and court orders
Effective
1 January 2020
Pages
8
Status
In force
Open the source document The official copy, as published. Opens in a new tab.
Source document Preview loads as you scroll

What the case concerns

The Tamil Nadu Real Estate Appellate Tribunal considered applications filed by M/s. Oragadam City Developers Private Limited and four other developers in Appeal Nos. 48 and 49 of 2020. The appeals challenged ex parte orders obtained by homebuyers in C.C.P. Nos. 159 and 160 of 2019.

The homebuyers had paid substantial amounts for row houses that were due for delivery in 2013. They complained that possession had not been handed over and sought refunds with interest, compensation, costs and litigation expenses. The Adjudicating Officer granted relief based on the available records after the first respondent developer failed to appear. The other developer respondents had not been issued notice.

Positions of the parties

The developers sought waiver of the deposit required before their appeals could be heard. Their main claims were:

  • Construction had been completed and handover was offered.
  • The homebuyers had discussed taking alternative units.
  • The original decisions were ex parte and did not consider the developers’ evidence.
  • Paying the full amount ordered would cause loss and hardship.

The homebuyers argued that the handover letter did not reflect the actual condition of the project. They also maintained that the required deposit was necessary before the appeals could be entertained.

Tribunal’s reasoning

The Tamil Nadu Real Estate Appellate Tribunal considered Section 43(5) of the Real Estate Regulation and Development Act 2016, which requires a promoter to make a deposit before an appeal is heard. It also considered court decisions concerning the Tribunal’s discretion over the amount to be deposited.

The Tribunal noted that the original decisions were ex parte and that notices had not been issued to all developer respondents. Treating those circumstances as significant, it declined to waive payment entirely but required a deposit of 30% rather than the entire amount ordered by the Adjudicating Officer.

Result and practical effect

The Tamil Nadu Real Estate Appellate Tribunal allowed Miscellaneous Application Nos. 83 and 85 of 2020 subject to these conditions:

  • The developers had to deposit 30% of the total amount ordered in each complaint.
  • The deposit deadline was 10 January 2021.
  • Failure to deposit would automatically dismiss the applications.
  • The matters were listed for compliance on 11 January 2021.

The ruling concerns the deposit needed for these particular appeals. It does not decide the final merits of the homebuyers’ refund and compensation claims.

This summary is generated from the source document to help you find what is relevant. The PDF above is authoritative. For advice on your own property, use LandLens One or speak to a qualified professional.

Common questions

Did the Tribunal completely waive the developers’ deposit?

No. The Tamil Nadu Real Estate Appellate Tribunal required the developers to deposit 30% of the total amount ordered by the Adjudicating Officer in each case.

What would happen if the developers did not deposit the amount by 10 January 2021?

The applications would automatically stand dismissed.

Did the Tribunal finally decide whether the homebuyers should receive refunds and compensation?

No. The Common Order dealt with the deposit condition for entertaining the developers’ appeals, not the final merits of the refund and compensation claims.

Why did the Tribunal require only a 30% deposit in these cases?

The Tribunal relied on the special circumstances that the Adjudicating Officer’s decisions were ex parte and that notices had not been issued to all developer respondents.