Case law, Tamil Nadu land law
Common Order, Appeal Nos. 67 to 72 of 2022
The Tamil Nadu Real Estate Appellate Tribunal delivered the common order in Appeal Nos. 67 to 72 of 2022 on 8 September 2023 concerning six allottees in the Rail Vihar project at Ambattur, Chennai, and the Indian Railway Welfare Organization. The Tribunal held that the promoter could not be directed to refund additional construction costs and that the allottees must pay the applicable stamp duty and registration charges to register their sale deeds.
What the appeals concern
The common order in Appeal Nos. 67 to 72 of 2022 was delivered by the Tamil Nadu Real Estate Appellate Tribunal on 8 September 2023. Six allottees appealed against the disallowed portion of a common order passed by the Tamil Nadu Real Estate Regulatory Authority on 29 September 2022.
The allottees had received separate dwelling units built by the Indian Railway Welfare Organization at Ambattur, Chennai. They sought:
- Refund of additional construction costs collected from them.
- A direction requiring the promoter to bear additional stamp duty and registration charges.
- Registration of sale deeds and completion of remaining amenities.
Project background
The Indian Railway Welfare Organization purchased the project land in 2004 and opened bookings in 2006. The land was originally classified for industrial use, and the change to residential classification took until 2011. Planning permission and construction followed, while possession was delivered in 2018.
No construction agreement or agreement for sale was executed between the parties. The source records that no construction completion period was specified. The allottees had, however, submitted letters of acceptance and undertaking.
Tribunal findings
The Tamil Nadu Real Estate Appellate Tribunal relied on the project brochures and the allottees' letters of acceptance and undertaking. Its key findings were:
- Apartment costs shown in the brochures were approximate and subject to revision for matters including approvals, tender costs, labour and material escalation, design changes and delays beyond the promoter's control.
- The brochure excluded stamp duty and registration charges from the stated apartment cost.
- Each allottee had accepted that the estimated cost could be revised and agreed to pay escalation and other charges demanded by the Indian Railway Welfare Organization.
- The promoter therefore could not be directed to refund the additional dwelling unit costs.
- The promoter had stated that it was ready to execute the sale deeds. The allottees were required to pay the necessary stamp duty and registration charges.
Who may be affected
The common order directly concerns the six named Rail Vihar allottees and the Indian Railway Welfare Organization. It is particularly relevant to buyers examining whether a brochure or signed undertaking makes estimated project costs variable and places stamp duty and registration expenses on the allottee.
This summary is generated from the source document to help you find what is relevant. The PDF above is authoritative. For advice on your own property, use LandLens One or speak to a qualified professional.
Common questions
Did the Tribunal direct the promoter to refund the escalated construction cost?
No. The Tamil Nadu Real Estate Appellate Tribunal held that the brochure and signed undertakings allowed revision of the estimated cost, including escalation and other charges.
Who must pay the stamp duty and registration charges for the sale deeds?
The allottees must pay the necessary stamp duty and registration charges. The brochure stated that these charges were not included in the approximate apartment cost.
Was there a construction agreement or agreement for sale?
No. The source states that, apart from the booking letter, no construction agreement or agreement for sale of land was executed between the parties.
Why was the Ambattur project delayed?
The source identifies the lengthy change of land classification from industrial to residential, delays in civic services, and disputes referred to arbitration. The promoter had also offered allottees an opportunity to withdraw and receive a refund with interest.