Minutes of the 37th Meeting of the Monitoring Committee Held on 30.12.2009
The Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority Monitoring Committee issued these minutes for its 37th meeting, held on 30 December 2009. The minutes accept evidence about the completion dates of two Chennai buildings, approve recommendations on completion certificate norms and procedure, and defer a regularisation case involving six residential blocks.
What the minutes cover
The Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority Monitoring Committee recorded decisions concerning building regularisation and completion certificate procedures at its meeting on 30 December 2009. The minutes were signed by the Additional Chief Secretary and Vice Chairperson of the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority, who was also Coordinator of the Monitoring Committee.
The document may affect owners, developers or professionals connected with the properties identified below. It may also be relevant to completion certificate work, although the detailed recommendations approved by the committee are not reproduced in the supplied minutes.
Decisions on completion evidence
The Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority Monitoring Committee accepted evidence that two buildings had been completed before 28 February 1999:
- For the basement, ground floor, five floors and part of the sixth floor office building at Door No. 265/A, TTK Road, Mylapore, the committee accepted assessment particulars from the 1995 to 1996 Survey Register as credible evidence. Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority inspection reports dated 10 November 1999 and 19 November 1999 were accepted as supporting evidence.
- For the ground floor, two floors and part of the third floor industrial and residential building at Door No. 6, 1st Reddy Street, Ekkattuthangal, the committee accepted a Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority demolition notice dated 1 June 1994 as credible evidence. An inspection report dated 25 November 1999 was accepted as supporting evidence.
Completion certificate procedure
The Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority Monitoring Committee considered the subcommittee recommendations on revision of completion certificate norms and procedure. After discussion, it accepted and approved those recommendations in full. The minutes do not set out the recommendations themselves, so they do not provide the revised requirements or procedure.
Deferred residential project
The Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority Monitoring Committee deferred the regularisation matter concerning six residential blocks of ground floor plus nine floors at Door Nos. 135 and 142, Poonamallee High Road, Egmore, associated with M/s. Kences Foundation.
The committee requested:
- An inspection report on the current position on the ground, considering the renewed planning permission.
- A factual note on the legal issues in the case.
- Copies of any interim orders of the High Court of Madras.
The minutes therefore do not record a final regularisation decision for this project.
This summary is generated from the source document to help you find what is relevant. The PDF above is authoritative. For advice on your own property, use LandLens One or speak to a qualified professional.
Common questions
Did the committee approve regularisation of the six residential blocks on Poonamallee High Road?
No final decision is recorded. The Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority Monitoring Committee deferred the matter and requested an inspection report, a legal position note and copies of any interim High Court of Madras orders.
What did the committee decide about the building at Door No. 265/A, TTK Road?
The committee accepted that the identified office building had been completed before 28 February 1999, based on survey register assessment particulars and Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority inspection reports.
Was the Ekkattuthangal building treated as completed before 28 February 1999?
Yes. The committee accepted the demolition notice dated 1 June 1994 as credible evidence and the inspection report dated 25 November 1999 as supporting evidence.
Do these minutes explain the revised completion certificate norms?
No. The minutes state that the subcommittee recommendations were approved in full, but they do not reproduce or explain those recommendations.
