Annexure to the Minutes of the MC Meeting held on 23.02.2007, Agenda Item No. 6.3
The MC, at its meeting held on 23 February 2007, recorded property-specific resolutions under Agenda Item No. 6.3 concerning demolition, restoration to approved plans, fire safety and regularisation. The annexure is not identified as a government order and gives no order number, but it may directly affect the named applicants and properties.
What the document covers
The annexure records decisions on individual building files considered by the MC on 23 February 2007. Each entry identifies an applicant, registration number, file number and property address, followed by the resolution for that case.
The supplied text contains entries numbered 1 to 30 and 34 to 35. Entries 31 to 33 are not included in the supplied text.
Main decisions
The resolutions include the following actions:
- Demolition notices are directed in ten cases, including properties connected with Fazil Sait G.S. on Ellis Road, Thiru V. Prakashchand Jain on Thiruvotriyur High Road, Banumathi Sundararaman on C.P. Ramasamy Road and Neyveli Lignite Corporation Limited on Poonamallee High Road.
- Several applicants are to receive notices requiring the building to be restored according to the approved plan and applicable fire safety measures to be ensured.
- Rajyog Construction Limited's application for 25 and 26 College Road, Nungambakkam, was rejected because evidence was not furnished. Restoration to the approved plan and applicable fire safety measures were requested, and the government was to be informed.
- Habeeb Md. S.M.A.J. and others were to be notified to restore the building according to the government order and ensure applicable fire safety measures.
- Prema Pandian V. and J. Mohanlal were to be asked to produce the original approved plan. Failure to produce it would lead to a demolition notice. If produced, a further notice would require restoration according to that plan and applicable fire safety measures.
- Rahila S.M.A. and others were treated as regularisable subject to a joint inspection, a fire safety no-objection certificate and adoption of an alternative fire safety system because the required setback was unavailable.
- M. Devarajulu and three others were eligible for regularisation only if the fourth floor was demolished.
Who should check it
Named applicants, current owners, buyers and professionals examining any listed address should compare the registration number, file number, door number, street, locality and village. A matching property may be subject to demolition, restoration, fire safety or conditional regularisation action recorded in the annexure.
This summary is generated from the source document to help you find what is relevant. The PDF above is authoritative. For advice on your own property, use LandLens One or speak to a qualified professional.
Common questions
Does the annexure order demolition for every listed property?
No. Ten entries direct demolition notices, while other entries require restoration, production of an approved plan, fire safety measures or compliance with conditions for regularisation.
What happens if the original approved plan is not produced in the Prema Pandian V. or J. Mohanlal cases?
The resolution states that a demolition notice is to be issued if the original approved plan is not produced.
Was the Rajyog Construction Limited application accepted?
No. The application was rejected because evidence was not furnished, with a request to restore the building to the approved plan and ensure applicable fire safety measures.
Is the M. Devarajulu property eligible for regularisation?
Yes, but only if the fourth floor is demolished.
