primary law

Tamil Nadu Government Gazette, Number 16, Part VI, Section 3(a), 29 April 2009

The Government of Tamil Nadu published Tamil Nadu Government Gazette Number 16, Part VI, Section 3(a), on 29 April 2009. It records Tamil Nadu Wakf Board decisions dated 26 February 2009 extending direct management of four Chennai wakfs, publishes insolvency notices from Subordinate Judges' courts, and lists a Chennai Port Trust advertisement concerning unclaimed and uncleared goods. It mainly affects the named wakfs, parties to the listed court proceedings, and persons interested in the listed port goods.

Category
Gazette notifications
Pages
22
Status
In force
Open the source document The official copy, as published. Opens in a new tab.
Source document Preview loads as you scroll

What the Gazette covers

Tamil Nadu Government Gazette Number 16, Part VI, Section 3(a), contains notifications from cost recoverable institutions of the State and Central Governments. The supplied text includes Tamil Nadu Wakf Board management notifications, judicial insolvency notices and a contents entry for a Chennai Port Trust advertisement.

The Gazette does not set out a general change to land registration, planning or land use. Its potential property relevance is limited to interests connected with the named wakfs, the parties in the insolvency proceedings, or the goods covered by the Chennai Port Trust advertisement.

Tamil Nadu Wakf Board decisions

The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board used its powers under Section 65 of the Wakf Act, 1995, to continue direct management of four Chennai wakfs:

  • Nanbai Makkan Wakf and Shaik Hussain Malick Sha Dargha Wakf, George Town. Resolution item Number 254/08, Rc. 4193/06/B1/Chennai, dated 26 February 2009, recognised direct management from 29 November 2008 to 25 February 2009 and extended it from 26 February 2009 to 25 February 2010.
  • Madarasa-e-Islamia, 20, P.V. Iyer Lane, Mahfuz Khan Garden. Resolution item Number 10/08, Rc. 8/06/B1/Chennai, dated 26 February 2009, recognised management from 28 August 2008 to 25 February 2009. The printed text says the six month extension ran from 26 February 2009 to 25 February 2009, which is internally inconsistent.
  • Hazarath Syed Hussain Sha Khadiri Dargha and Pallivasal, also described as Dimmasamy Dargha and Pallivasal, Perambur. Notification Number VI-3(a)/73/2009 records an extension from 26 February 2009 to 25 August 2009.
  • Dadasha Makkan Wakf, Perambur. Notification Number VI-3(a)/74/2009 records an extension from 26 February 2009 to 25 August 2009.

Judicial and port notices

The Subordinate Judge of Namakkal published several notices of petitions seeking to have named debtors or respondents adjudged insolvent. The listed Namakkal matters were posted to 9 June 2009. The Subordinate Judge of Pollachi also published petitions posted for enquiry on 30 June 2009.

The contents page lists a Chennai Port Trust advertisement covering unclaimed and uncleared goods in Chennai Port Trust premises.

This summary is generated from the source document to help you find what is relevant. The PDF above is authoritative. For advice on your own property, use LandLens One or speak to a qualified professional.

Common questions

Does this Gazette change land registration or land use rules in Tamil Nadu?

No general change to land registration, planning or land use appears in the supplied text. The main property related content concerns direct management of four named Chennai wakfs.

Which wakfs were placed under extended direct management?

The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board extended direct management for wakfs in George Town, Mahfuz Khan Garden and Perambur, including Nanbai Makkan Wakf, Shaik Hussain Malick Sha Dargha Wakf, Madarasa-e-Islamia, Hazarath Syed Hussain Sha Khadiri Dargha and Pallivasal, and Dadasha Makkan Wakf.

When did the direct management of Dadasha Makkan Wakf end under the notification?

Notification Number VI-3(a)/74/2009 states that direct management was extended from 26 February 2009 to 25 August 2009.

Is the extension date for Madarasa-e-Islamia clear?

No. The printed text says a six month extension ran from 26 February 2009 to 25 February 2009, so the stated end date conflicts with the stated duration and starting date.