Advertisement of Petition, Company Petition No. 52 of 2014
The High Court of Judicature at Madras issued Notification No. VI-3(a)/43/2014, dated 21 May 2014, advertising a petition by Texmaco Rail & Engineering Limited for the winding up of ETA Engineering Private Limited. The Government of Tamil Nadu published the notification in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette on 4 June 2014, and the petition was listed for hearing on 16 June 2014.
What the notification covers
Notification No. VI-3(a)/43/2014 is an advertisement of Company Petition No. 52 of 2014 before the High Court of Judicature at Madras in its original jurisdiction. The proceeding concerns a petition for winding up ETA Engineering Private Limited under the Companies Act, 1956.
The notification identifies:
- Texmaco Rail & Engineering Limited as the petitioner.
- ETA Engineering Private Limited as the respondent.
- ETA Engineering Private Limited's registered office as No. 5, Moores Road, Chennai 600 006, Tamil Nadu.
- Roc. No. 2096/2014/(O.S) as the court reference.
- 23 January 2014 as the date on which the petition was presented.
- 16 June 2014 as the date fixed for the hearing.
Who may be affected
The advertisement is relevant to creditors, contributories and other persons who wished to support or oppose the winding-up petition. It may also be relevant to anyone who had financial or business dealings with ETA Engineering Private Limited at the time of the proceeding.
The notification does not announce a winding-up order. It gives notice that a winding-up petition had been presented and was due to be heard by the High Court of Judicature at Madras.
The notification concerns a company proceeding, rather than the ownership, registration, classification or permitted use of land. A property buyer would therefore be affected only if the proposed transaction or claim involved ETA Engineering Private Limited or its interests.
Participation requirements
Notification No. VI-3(a)/43/2014 set out the following steps for participation in the hearing:
- A creditor, contributory or other person intending to support or oppose the petition had to send signed notice of that intention to the petitioner or its advocate.
- The notice had to include the person's name and address and reach the petitioner or advocate no later than five days before the hearing.
- The person could appear at the hearing personally or through an advocate.
- An affidavit intended to oppose the petition had to be filed in court, with a copy served on the petitioner or its advocate, not less than five days before the hearing.
- A creditor or contributory could obtain a copy of the petition from the undersigned after paying the prescribed charges.
This summary is generated from the source document to help you find what is relevant. The PDF above is authoritative. For advice on your own property, use LandLens One or speak to a qualified professional.
Common questions
Did the High Court order ETA Engineering Private Limited to be wound up?
No winding-up order is recorded in the notification. It only advertises the petition and states that it was fixed for hearing on 16 June 2014.
Who filed the winding-up petition?
The notification lists Texmaco Rail & Engineering Limited as the petitioner and ETA Engineering Private Limited as the respondent.
Could a creditor oppose or support the petition?
Yes. A creditor, contributory or other person could send signed notice to the petitioner or its advocate no later than five days before the hearing and appear personally or through an advocate.
Does the notification change any land ownership or land-use rights?
The notification deals with a company winding-up petition. It does not state any change to land ownership, registration, classification or permitted land use.
