primary law

Advertisement of Petition, Company Petition No. 205 of 2012

The High Court of Judicature at Madras, under Judicial Notifications, issued Roc. No. 524/2013 (O.S.), published by authority in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette on June 19, 2013. It gives notice of a creditor's petition seeking the winding-up of Dpex Worldwide Express Private Limited and explains how creditors, contributories and other interested persons could support or oppose the petition.

Category
Gazette notifications
Pages
2
Status
In force
Open the source document The official copy, as published. Opens in a new tab.
Source document Preview loads as you scroll

What the notification covers

The High Court of Judicature at Madras issued Roc. No. 524/2013 (O.S.) as a judicial notification in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette dated June 19, 2013. The notification concerns Company Petition No. 205 of 2012, filed under the Companies Act, 1956, seeking the winding-up of Dpex Worldwide Express Private Limited.

The petition was presented by Prashant Naidu, proprietor of Unique Express, who is identified as a creditor. Dpex Worldwide Express Private Limited, with an address at Dr. Thirumurthy Nagar, Nungambakkam, Chennai, is the respondent.

What the notice does

The Advertisement of Petition publicly records the winding-up proceedings and gives interested parties an opportunity to participate. Its key details are:

  • The petition was presented to the High Court at Madras on June 19, 2012.
  • The petition sought the winding-up of Dpex Worldwide Express Private Limited.
  • The stated hearing date was February 27, 2013.
  • A creditor, contributory or other person wishing to support or oppose the petition had to notify the petitioner or the petitioner's advocates.
  • The notice of intention had to be signed, include the person's name and address, and reach the petitioner or advocates no later than five days before the hearing.
  • A person wishing to participate could appear at the hearing personally or through an advocate.
  • An affidavit opposing the petition had to be filed in court, with a copy served on the petitioner or the petitioner's advocate, at least five days before the hearing.
  • A creditor or contributory could obtain a copy of the petition from the named counsel on payment of the prescribed charges.

Who may be affected

The judicial notification directly concerns Dpex Worldwide Express Private Limited, the petitioning creditor, other creditors, contributories and persons interested in the winding-up proceedings. It does not announce a land law, planning measure, property registration requirement or change to land rights. A property buyer or owner would have a reason to examine it only if a transaction or claim involved the respondent company or its assets.

This summary is generated from the source document to help you find what is relevant. The PDF above is authoritative. For advice on your own property, use LandLens One or speak to a qualified professional.

Common questions

Does this notification change any Tamil Nadu land or property rule?

No land or property rule is stated. The notification advertises a petition seeking the winding-up of Dpex Worldwide Express Private Limited.

Who filed the winding-up petition?

Prashant Naidu, proprietor of Unique Express, filed the petition as a creditor.

Could another creditor oppose or support the petition?

Yes. A creditor, contributory or other person could give signed notice of the intention to support or oppose the petition and appear personally or through an advocate.

Could a creditor obtain a copy of the petition?

Yes. The notification states that counsel for the petitioner would provide a copy to a creditor or contributory on payment of the prescribed charges.