primary law

Tamil Nadu Government Gazette, No. 25, Part VI, Section 1 (25 VI 1 v3)

The Government of Tamil Nadu published Tamil Nadu Government Gazette No. 25, Part VI, Section 1 on 6 July 2011, containing notifications issued by the Director of Town and Country Planning, the Coimbatore Local Planning Authority and the Fourth Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet. Notifications No. VI(1)/286/2011, VI(1)/288/2011 and VI(1)/289/2011, together with the Coimbatore master plan variation under Roc. No. 4383/2008/LPA-3, confirm or make land use changes in parts of Erode and Coimbatore, while Notification No. VI(1)/290/2011 gives notice that specified old court records will be destroyed unless documents are reclaimed in time.

Category
Gazette notifications
Pages
5
Status
In force
Open the source document The official copy, as published. Opens in a new tab.
Source document Preview loads as you scroll

Planning changes covered

The Tamil Nadu Government Gazette dated 6 July 2011 publishes several separate planning notifications under the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971. They affect particular plans, villages and land parcels rather than all property in Tamil Nadu.

  • Notification No. VI(1)/286/2011 confirms a comprehensive variation to Veerappanchatram Detailed Development Plan No. 11 in the Erode Local Planning Area. The Director of Town and Country Planning signed the confirmation on 17 June 2011 after no objections or suggestions were received. The varied plan is Map No. 5 DDP(V)/DTCP No. 4/2007, and its clauses and schedules became enforceable upon Gazette publication.
  • The Coimbatore Local Planning Authority variation under Roc. No. 4383/2008/LPA-3 changes the land use schedule for Perur Chettipalayam Village in Coimbatore Taluk. It inserts extensive listed survey numbers under commercial, industrial and agricultural entries. The notification relies on Government Order Ms. No. 94 of the Housing and Urban Development Department, dated 12 June 2009, and was signed on 8 April 2011.
  • Notification No. VI(1)/288/2011 varies the Coimbatore master plan schedule for Kannampalayam Village in Palladam Taluk. Survey No. 88/1C1 is excluded from the mixed residential entry covering Survey Nos. 88 to 91 and added to the industrial entry. The Coimbatore Local Planning Authority signed it on 26 October 2010.

Coimbatore town planning scheme

Notification No. VI(1)/289/2011 confirms conversion of T.S. No. 1086/1A in Krishnarayapuram Village, Coimbatore Corporation, from residential use to commercial use. The Director of Town and Country Planning signed it on 23 June 2011, and the change became enforceable upon Gazette publication.

The source describes the property first as Ward 17, Block 10, but the confirmation records it as Block 17, Ward 10. A buyer or owner should note this inconsistency when matching the notification to property records.

Court record destruction notice

Notification No. VI(1)/290/2011, issued by the Fourth Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, on 22 June 2011, covers listed records from the Metropolitan Magistrates' Courts at Saidapet. Parties were directed to apply for return of their documents within one month from Gazette publication, failing which the documents would be destroyed with the records under the applicable rules.

This summary is generated from the source document to help you find what is relevant. The PDF above is authoritative. For advice on your own property, use LandLens One or speak to a qualified professional.

Common questions

Does the Gazette change land use across all of Coimbatore and Erode?

No. The changes apply to specified plans, villages and survey or town survey numbers in the Erode and Coimbatore local planning areas.

When did the Veerappanchatram plan variation become enforceable?

The varied plan, Map No. 5 DDP(V)/DTCP No. 4/2007, became enforceable from publication of the notification in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette.

Was T.S. No. 1086/1A in Krishnarayapuram Village changed to commercial use?

Yes. Notification No. VI(1)/289/2011 confirms its conversion from residential to commercial use. The source contains conflicting descriptions of its ward and block numbers.

What did parties with documents in the Saidapet court records have to do?

They had to apply to the Fourth Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, for return of their documents within one month from publication of the Gazette. Otherwise, the documents would be destroyed with the listed records.