Insolvency Petitions, I.P. No. 1/2013
The Court of the I Additional District Judge, Tirunelveli issued the notice for Insolvency Petition Number 1 of 2013, Document Number 9780 of 2013, published by the Government of Tamil Nadu in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette on August 7, 2013. It records that M. Esakkiraj applied to be declared insolvent and that the petition was listed for hearing on August 29, 2013, but it does not record the outcome or make any order concerning land.
What the notification does
The Court of the I Additional District Judge, Tirunelveli issued the notice for Insolvency Petition Number 1 of 2013, Document Number 9780 of 2013. The Government of Tamil Nadu published it in Part VI, Section 3(a) of the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette on August 7, 2013. The notice says that M. Esakkiraj applied to the court to be declared insolvent and that the petition was posted for hearing on August 29, 2013.
The notice was given under section 19(2) of the Provincial Insolvency Act. It is dated February 13, 2013, and also carries a Tirunelveli entry dated July 31, 2013, signed by T.S. Nanda Kumar, I Additional District Judge.
People and businesses named
Insolvency Petition Number 1 of 2013 identifies:
- M. Esakkiraj of Kottakulam, Shencottah Taluk, Tirunelveli District, as the petitioner.
- Velmurugan Timbers, through partner R. Subramanian, as a respondent.
- Annai Velankanni Timbers and Agency, through proprietor G. Brunoon Herald, as a respondent.
- Akshaya Trading Company, through proprietor Iyyappan, as a respondent.
- Sri Lakshmi Saw Mill and Sri Lakshmi Timbers, through proprietor M. Shrinivasan, as a respondent.
- Sri Mahalakshmi Timbers and Traders, through proprietor M. Shrinivasan, as a respondent.
- M.K.V. Kandasamy Nadar Timbers, through its proprietor, as a respondent.
Relevance to property transactions
The Tamil Nadu Government Gazette notification is an insolvency hearing notice, not a land notification. It does not identify any survey number, property, sale, mortgage, attachment, land classification or change of land use.
A buyer, owner or professional may find it relevant if a proposed transaction involves the named petitioner, respondents or businesses. The text only confirms that an application was made and a hearing was scheduled. It does not say that M. Esakkiraj was declared insolvent, state what happened at the hearing, or record any final decision affecting property.
This summary is generated from the source document to help you find what is relevant. The PDF above is authoritative. For advice on your own property, use LandLens One or speak to a qualified professional.
Common questions
Does this Gazette notice transfer or restrict any land?
No land transfer or restriction is recorded. The notice does not identify any property or survey number and only announces an insolvency petition and hearing.
Was M. Esakkiraj declared insolvent by this notice?
The notice only says that M. Esakkiraj applied to be declared insolvent. It does not provide the court's final decision.
When was the insolvency petition scheduled for hearing?
Insolvency Petition Number 1 of 2013 was posted for hearing on August 29, 2013.
Why might a Tamil Nadu property buyer check this notice?
It may be relevant if the transaction involves M. Esakkiraj or one of the named respondents or businesses. The notification itself does not state that any particular property was affected.
