Tamil Nadu Government Gazette, Part VI, Section 3(a), No. 31, 2015
The Government of Tamil Nadu published Tamil Nadu Government Gazette, Part VI, Section 3(a), No. 31 on 5 August 2015, containing High Court of Judicature at Madras notices for three company winding up petitions. The notices invited creditors, contributories and other interested persons to support or oppose the petitions, and do not announce any land title, land use or planning change.
What the gazette contains
Tamil Nadu Government Gazette, Part VI, Section 3(a), No. 31 was published by authority of the Government of Tamil Nadu on 5 August 2015. The Director of Stationery and Printing, Chennai, printed and published it on behalf of the Government of Tamil Nadu.
The relevant judicial notifications are advertisements of winding up petitions before the High Court of Judicature at Madras, exercising its Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction. They notify interested persons of the petitions and the scheduled hearing dates. They do not report that the companies have already been wound up.
Companies and petitions covered
The High Court of Judicature at Madras notifications cover:
- Company Petition No. 211 of 2015, filed by Super Sales India Limited against Auro Mira Bio Energy Pudukkottai India Limited. The petition was presented on 20 April 2015 and was listed for hearing on 10 August 2015.
- Company Petition No. 221 of 2012, filed by S. Ravindra Kumar against Thalavadi Rock & Mineral Products Limited. The petition was presented on 1 July 2015 and was listed for hearing on 14 August 2015.
- Company Petition No. 105 of 2015, filed by Telimart Systems against BroVis Wireless Networks Private Limited. The petition was presented on 24 June 2015 and was listed for hearing on 21 August 2015.
Requirements stated in the notices
Each winding up petition advertisement states that:
- A creditor, contributory or other person wishing to support or oppose the petition had to notify the petitioner or the petitioner's advocate.
- The notice of intention had to include the person's name and address and be signed by the person or advocate.
- The notice had to reach the petitioner or advocate not later than five days before the hearing.
- A person supporting or opposing the petition could appear at the hearing personally or through an advocate.
- A creditor or contributory could obtain a copy of the petition on payment of the prescribed charges.
- An opposing affidavit had to be filed in court and served on the petitioner or advocate not less than five days before the hearing.
Relevance to property transactions
Tamil Nadu Government Gazette, Part VI, Section 3(a), No. 31 contains company court notices rather than a land notification. It does not identify land parcels, change land use, amend planning controls or record ownership. A buyer or professional dealing with one of the named companies may nevertheless consider the existence of the winding up petition as part of company related due diligence.
This summary is generated from the source document to help you find what is relevant. The PDF above is authoritative. For advice on your own property, use LandLens One or speak to a qualified professional.
Common questions
Does this gazette change the ownership or permitted use of any land?
No land parcel, ownership change, land use change or planning control is identified. The gazette contains advertisements of company winding up petitions.
Were the three companies declared wound up by these notices?
The notices only advertise petitions and give hearing dates. They do not state that the High Court of Judicature at Madras made final winding up orders.
Who could support or oppose a winding up petition?
A creditor, contributory or other interested person could support or oppose a petition by notifying the petitioner or the petitioner's advocate and appearing personally or through an advocate.
Could a creditor obtain a copy of a petition?
Yes. Each notice states that a copy would be provided to a creditor or contributory on payment of the prescribed charges.
