Advertisement of Petition (33 VI 3a v4)
The High Court of Judicature at Madras issued Judicial Notification No. VI-3(a)/90/2016, dated 12 August 2016 and published in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette on 17 August 2016, advertising a petition to wind up Stora Enso Inpac Delta India Private Limited. The notice informed creditors, contributories and other interested persons about the scheduled hearing and the steps for supporting or opposing the petition.
What the notification covers
Judicial Notification No. VI-3(a)/90/2016 concerns a winding-up petition involving Stora Enso Inpac Delta India Private Limited under the Companies Act, 1956. The company was identified as having its registered office at 10/1, 13th Street, Nandanam Extension, Nandanam, Chennai, and was represented by its Director, Chandra Pratap Krishnaji Rao.
The petition was presented to the High Court of Judicature at Madras on 6 November 2015. The notification stated that the petition was scheduled to be heard on 6 September 2016.
Who could be affected
The advertisement was directed mainly at:
- Creditors of Stora Enso Inpac Delta India Private Limited.
- Contributories of the company.
- Other persons wishing to support or oppose a winding-up order.
The notification does not create or change land ownership, planning permission, land classification or property registration requirements. Its relevance to a property buyer, owner or professional would depend on whether Stora Enso Inpac Delta India Private Limited was involved in a property, payment, contract or other transaction affecting them.
Steps stated in the notice
Judicial Notification No. VI-3(a)/90/2016 set out the following procedure for participation in the winding-up hearing:
- A person wishing to support or oppose the petition had to send written notice of that intention to the petitioner or the petitioner’s advocates.
- The notice had to be signed by the person or their advocate and include the person’s name and address.
- The notice had to reach the petitioner or the petitioner’s advocates not later than five days before the hearing date.
- The interested person could appear at the hearing personally or through an advocate.
- An affidavit intended to oppose the petition had to be filed in court, with a copy served on the petitioner or the petitioner’s advocate, not less than five days before the hearing.
- A creditor or contributory could obtain a copy of the petition from the petitioner’s counsel on payment of the prescribed charges.
The advertisement was dated at Chennai on 22 July 2016. The High Court entry was dated 12 August 2016 and signed by C.B. Meena, Joint Registrar, Original Side.
This summary is generated from the source document to help you find what is relevant. The PDF above is authoritative. For advice on your own property, use LandLens One or speak to a qualified professional.
Common questions
Does this notification change the ownership or status of any land?
No land ownership or land classification change is stated. The notification advertises a company winding-up petition before the High Court of Judicature at Madras.
Which company was the winding-up petition about?
The petition concerned Stora Enso Inpac Delta India Private Limited, whose registered office was stated to be in Nandanam Extension, Chennai.
Who was allowed to support or oppose the petition?
Any creditor, contributory or other interested person could support or oppose the making of a winding-up order by giving the required notice and appearing personally or through an advocate.
Could a creditor obtain a copy of the winding-up petition?
Yes. The notification stated that a creditor or contributory could obtain a copy from the petitioner’s counsel on payment of the prescribed charges.
