Variations to Approved Master Plans and Hosur New Town Development Plan
Published by the Government of Tamil Nadu in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette on 28th August 2019, notifications issued by the Coimbatore Local Planning Authority, Kumbakonam Local Planning Authority and Hosur New Town Development Authority amend land-use schedules for specified survey fields in their planning areas. The Coimbatore variations refer to G.O.(2D) No. 84 and G.O.(2D) No. 88 of the Housing and Urban Development Department, both dated 11th June 2019, and G.O.(2D) No. 50 of the Housing and Urban Development Department, dated 8th March 2019, while the Hosur variation refers to G.O.Ms. No. 113 of the Housing and Urban Development Department, dated 8th July 2019. Only the listed land in Arisipalayam, Vellakinar, Keeranatham, Kumbakonam and Nagondapalli is reclassified.
What the notifications change
The Coimbatore Local Planning Authority, Kumbakonam Local Planning Authority and Hosur New Town Development Authority have amended their approved planning documents by changing the land-use entries for particular survey fields. The changes move specified land between agricultural, industrial, residential and commercial classifications.
The Coimbatore notifications were signed by the Member-Secretary (In-Charge) of the Coimbatore Local Planning Authority. The Kumbakonam and Hosur notifications were signed by the respective Member-Secretary (In-charge).
Coimbatore Local Planning Area
The Coimbatore Local Planning Authority made the following changes:
- In Arisipalayam Village, survey field 231/1B is excluded from the Agricultural (Ag-34) entry covering fields 222 to 231 and added to the Residential entry.
- In Vellakinar Village, Detailed Development Plan No. 4, survey field 342 part remains industrial except for 342/2A, 342/2B, 342/2C and 342/1D2. Those subdivisions, together with 144/2A, are added to the Residential entry.
- In Keeranatham Village and Panchayat, Annur Taluk, survey fields 606/2B, 606/3B and 607/2B2 are excluded from the Agricultural entry and added to Residential (PR-7). The remaining stated agricultural coverage is 604 to 607, subject to those exclusions, and 608 to 637.
Kumbakonam Local Planning Area
The Kumbakonam Local Planning Authority changed the land-use schedule for Ward No. 1, Block No. 13:
- The Residential MR-9 entry is revised from fields 350 to 356 to fields 350 to 355 and part of 356.
- The Commercial C-11 entry is stated with 349 part and 356A/1A.
The Kumbakonam notification is identified as Roc. No. 174/2012/KLPA.
Hosur New Town Development Area
The Hosur New Town Development Authority changed survey field 288/1B2B in Nagondapalli Village. The field, measuring 0.38 acres or 0.15.40 hectares, is deleted from the Agricultural Use Zone and added to the Commercial Use Zone.
Who should check the changes
Owners, buyers and professionals dealing with any listed survey field should compare the field number and subdivision in their records with the revised land-use schedule. The notifications describe planning classifications only and do not state that they grant a separate building or development approval.
This summary is generated from the source document to help you find what is relevant. The PDF above is authoritative. For advice on your own property, use LandLens One or speak to a qualified professional.
Common questions
Does this Gazette notification change the land use of every property in these planning areas?
No. The changes apply only to the survey fields and subdivisions specifically listed in Arisipalayam, Vellakinar, Keeranatham, Kumbakonam and Nagondapalli.
Which Coimbatore survey fields become residential?
The residential additions are Arisipalayam field 231/1B, Vellakinar fields 342/2A, 342/2B, 342/2C, 342/1D2 and 144/2A, and Keeranatham fields 606/2B, 606/3B and 607/2B2.
What happened to survey field 288/1B2B in Nagondapalli Village?
The Hosur New Town Development Authority deleted the 0.38 acre, or 0.15.40 hectare, field from the Agricultural Use Zone and added it to the Commercial Use Zone.
Does the notification itself grant permission to build on the reclassified land?
The source only amends the relevant land-use schedules. It does not state that a separate building or development approval is granted.
