Tamil Nadu Government Gazette, Part VI, Section 1, No. 35 (35 VI 1 v7)
The Government of Tamil Nadu published Tamil Nadu Government Gazette, Part VI, Section 1, No. 35 on 2 September 2015, containing public notifications from Heads of Departments and local planning authorities. It records notices concerning objects found in Dindigul district and changes to approved master plan land use classifications in the Tiruchirappalli, Coimbatore and Salem local planning areas, using powers connected with Housing and Urban Development Department, Government Order Ms. No. 94 dated 12 June 2009.
What the Gazette covers
Tamil Nadu Government Gazette, Part VI, Section 1, No. 35 publishes notifications of interest to the general public. The supplied text includes notices about objects found in Dindigul district and variations to approved master plans administered by local planning authorities.
The contents page also lists Cuddalore detailed development plan notifications. The supplied text does not include their substantive provisions.
Dindigul district finds
The Dindigul district notices concern statues, inscriptions, pottery, human bones, burial objects and other items found at several locations. The locations identified include M. Athappanpatti, Periyakottai, T. Koodalur, Ayakudi and Thadikombu.
Key points include:
- Several objects were placed for safekeeping at the Government Museum in Palani, the Vedasandur Sub Treasury Office or the Palani Tahsildar's office.
- People claiming full or partial rights in the finds were invited to appear before the Personal Assistant (General) to the Dindigul District Collector, personally or through an authorised representative, with supporting evidence.
- The notices state that a find may be declared ownerless if no claim is made or if a claim is rejected for lack of adequate evidence.
Tiruchirappalli land use changes
The Tiruchirappalli Local Planning Authority notification, Roc. No. 1769/2014 TLPA 2 dated 24 August 2015, changes part of Survey Field No. 13 in Tiruchirappalli Corporation from the agriculture entry to mixed residential use.
The Tiruchirappalli Local Planning Authority notification, Roc. No. 2043/2013/TLPA-2, changes Survey Field Nos. 492/2B part and 492/1A in Kambarasampettai Village from agriculture to educational use. It refers to Housing and Urban Development Department, Government Order (2D) No. 73 dated 17 July 2014 and states that conditions apply.
Coimbatore land use changes
Coimbatore notification No. VI(1)/233/2015 changes Survey Field No. 322/2B part in Thudiyalur Village from residential to commercial use. It refers to Housing and Urban Development Department, Government Order (2D) No. 3 dated 20 January 2015 and makes the change subject to stated conditions.
Coimbatore notification No. VI(1)/234/2015 adds Ward T, Block 13, Town Survey Nos. 18/3 and 18/4, corresponding to part of Survey Field No. 101, to public and semi-public use. The controlled industrial entry for Survey Field No. 101 is reduced to part only.
Who should check the changes
Owners, buyers, developers and professionals dealing with the identified survey fields should compare the revised land use classification with the relevant title, survey and planning records before relying on a proposed use.
This summary is generated from the source document to help you find what is relevant. The PDF above is authoritative. For advice on your own property, use LandLens One or speak to a qualified professional.
Common questions
Does the Gazette change all land in Tiruchirappalli or Coimbatore?
No. The supplied notifications identify particular survey fields or parts of survey fields within named villages and planning areas.
What happened to Survey Field No. 322/2B part in Thudiyalur Village?
Notification No. VI(1)/233/2015 removes Survey Field No. 322/2B part from the residential entry and adds it to the commercial entry, subject to stated conditions.
Which Tiruchirappalli land was added to educational use?
Survey Field Nos. 492/2B part and 492/1A in Kambarasampettai Village were removed from the agriculture entry and added to educational use.
Could an unclaimed object found in Dindigul district be declared ownerless?
Yes. The notices state that a find may be declared ownerless if nobody claims it or if a claim is rejected because adequate evidence is not provided.
