Tamil Nadu Government Gazette, Part VI, Section 3(a), No. 35 (35 VI 3 a v3)
The Government of Tamil Nadu, through the Director of Stationery and Printing, published Tamil Nadu Government Gazette, Part VI, Section 3(a), No. 35 on 5 September 2012. The issue gives judicial notice of an insolvency petition before the Subordinate Judge, Uthamapalayam, and two company winding-up petitions before the High Court of Judicature at Madras. It does not announce any land acquisition, land use change or property title rule.
What the Gazette issue contains
Tamil Nadu Government Gazette, Part VI, Section 3(a), No. 35 was printed and published by the Director of Stationery and Printing, Chennai, on behalf of the Government of Tamil Nadu on 5 September 2012. Part VI, Section 3(a) contains notifications issued by cost recoverable institutions of the State and Central Governments. The supplied pages contain judicial notifications, rather than a change to land or property law.
Insolvency petition at Uthamapalayam
The Court of the Subordinate Judge, Uthamapalayam, published a notice concerning A. Raviselvam, son of Arasappan, of Muthulapuram Post, Chinnamanur via, Uthamapalayam Taluk, Theni District.
Key details are:
- A. Raviselvam is identified as the petitioner.
- The notice states that the petitioner or debtor applied to be adjudged insolvent.
- The petition was posted for 21 September 2012.
- The Gazette lists numerous named individuals with addresses, mainly in Uthamapalayam Taluk and nearby towns and villages.
- The notice is dated 28 June 2012 and carries the name of S. Saravana Perumal, Subordinate Judge.
Company winding-up petitions
The High Court of Judicature at Madras, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction, published two advertisements of petition:
- Roc. No. 2213/2012 (O.S.) concerns Agnite Education Limited, formerly Teledata Informatics Limited. Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited is the petitioner. The winding-up petition was presented on 20 July 2009 and was directed to be heard on 26 September 2012.
- Roc. No. 2872/2012 (O.S.) concerns Corporate Media-Men Advertising Private Limited. Entertainment Network (India) Limited is the petitioner. The winding-up petition was presented on 29 November 2010 and was directed to be heard on 3 October 2012.
Creditors, contributories and other persons wishing to support or oppose either winding-up petition were instructed to notify the petitioner or advocates, with their name and address, not later than five days before the hearing. An opposing affidavit was also required to be filed in court and served on the petitioner or advocate not less than five days before the hearing.
Relevance to property readers
Tamil Nadu Government Gazette, Part VI, Section 3(a), No. 35 does not identify land, survey numbers, acquisition proceedings, planning changes or title restrictions. Its relevance is limited to people or organisations connected with the named insolvency and winding-up proceedings.
This summary is generated from the source document to help you find what is relevant. The PDF above is authoritative. For advice on your own property, use LandLens One or speak to a qualified professional.
Common questions
Does this Gazette issue change any land use or property rule?
No land use change, acquisition, survey number, title restriction or property rule appears in the supplied text. The issue contains judicial notices about insolvency and company winding-up petitions.
Who filed the insolvency petition in Uthamapalayam?
A. Raviselvam, son of Arasappan, is identified as the petitioner. The notice states that he applied to the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Uthamapalayam, to be adjudged insolvent.
Which companies were subject to winding-up petitions?
The notices concern Agnite Education Limited, formerly Teledata Informatics Limited, and Corporate Media-Men Advertising Private Limited.
Could a creditor oppose one of the winding-up petitions?
Yes. A creditor, contributory or other person wishing to support or oppose a petition was instructed to notify the petitioner or advocates not later than five days before the hearing and appear in person or through an advocate.
