G.O. Ms. No. 199, Acquisition of Lands, 2020
The Industries Department of the Government of Tamil Nadu issued G.O. Ms. No. 199, Industries (SIPCOT-LA), dated 2 September 2020, withdrawing specified lands from acquisition under the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997. The withdrawal covers two dry land survey parcels totalling 3.13.0 hectares because the Government had not taken actual possession.
What the notification does
The Industries Department of the Government of Tamil Nadu has withdrawn two parcels of land from acquisition. The withdrawal was made under the first proviso to sub-section (1) of section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purposes Act, 1997.
The affected lands had been included in an earlier acquisition notice published by the Industries (SIPCOT-LA) Department as Notification No. II(2)/IND/235(c-2)/2012. That notice appeared on pages 3 and 4 of Part II, Section 2 of the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette Extraordinary dated 7 May 2012.
Reason for withdrawal
G.O. Ms. No. 199, Industries (SIPCOT-LA), dated 2 September 2020, states that actual possession of the listed lands was not taken by, or on behalf of, the Government. The Governor of Tamil Nadu therefore withdrew those lands from acquisition.
The withdrawal applies only to the survey numbers and extents set out in the schedule.
Land covered
The schedule identifies both parcels as dry land:
- Survey No. 6, extent printed as 0.39.0 hectares.
- Survey No. 14/1, extent printed as 2.74.0 hectares.
- Total extent, 3.13.0 hectares.
The supplied Gazette page does not identify a district, taluk or village. The survey numbers alone therefore do not identify a location without reference to other land records or the earlier acquisition notification.
Owners and interested persons listed
For Survey No. 6, the schedule names:
- Aandreyas Naidu, son of Chinnappa Naidu.
- M/s. Jemi Investments Private Ltd.
- Veerabathiran.
- Kalidoss.
- Kamallammal, wife of Govindapillai.
For Survey No. 14/1, the schedule names:
- Annammal, wife of Mariyananthan.
- Bharani, daughter of Vellan.
Why it matters to property readers
A buyer, owner or professional dealing with either listed survey parcel should note that the Government withdrew it from the acquisition initiated through the 2012 notification. The Gazette notification records the withdrawal and the reason, namely that Government possession had not been taken.
This summary is generated from the source document to help you find what is relevant. The PDF above is authoritative. For advice on your own property, use LandLens One or speak to a qualified professional.
Common questions
Are Survey Nos. 6 and 14/1 still covered by the acquisition?
G.O. Ms. No. 199 withdraws the specified extents in Survey Nos. 6 and 14/1 from the acquisition initiated through the 2012 notification.
Why were these lands withdrawn from acquisition?
The notification states that actual possession had not been taken by, or on behalf of, the Government.
How much land is covered by the withdrawal?
The schedule lists 0.39.0 hectares in Survey No. 6 and 2.74.0 hectares in Survey No. 14/1, totalling 3.13.0 hectares.
Does the Gazette page identify the village or district?
No village, taluk or district is identified in the supplied Gazette page. It gives the survey numbers, land description, extents and names of owners or interested persons.
