primary law

Tamil Nadu Government Gazette, No. 37, Part VI, Section 3(a) (37 VI 3 a v3)

The Government of Tamil Nadu, through Tamil Nadu Government Gazette No. 37, Part VI, Section 3(a), dated 18 September 2013, publishes a Tamil Nadu Wakf Board management extension and notices concerning two insolvency petitions and one company winding-up petition. The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board notice, Rc. No. 7636/08/B8/DGL dated 8 July 2013, extends direct management of Madarasathul Sakiya Bi Balika Thaikka Wakf in Dindigul District up to 7 July 2014.

Category
Gazette notifications
Pages
5
Status
In force
Open the source document The official copy, as published. Opens in a new tab.
Source document Preview loads as you scroll

What the Gazette issue covers

Tamil Nadu Government Gazette No. 37, Part VI, Section 3(a), dated 18 September 2013, contains separate notices issued by the Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, the First Additional District Judge at Tirunelveli, and the High Court of Judicature at Madras. It publishes case specific information rather than a general rule governing land or property across Tamil Nadu.

The issue includes:

  • Extension of direct management for a named Wakf in Dindigul District.
  • Notices for two insolvency petitions before the First Additional District Judge, Tirunelveli.
  • Advertisement of a petition to wind up Universal Aviation Services Private Limited before the High Court of Judicature at Madras.

Wakf management extension

The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board notification, Rc. No. 7636/08/B8/DGL dated 8 July 2013, extends direct management of Madarasathul Sakiya Bi Balika Thaikka Wakf up to 7 July 2014. The extension follows a Board resolution dated 30 March 2010 and High Court orders dated 25 March 2013 in W.P. 16997/2012 and connected matters.

The extension was made by the Chief Executive Officer of the Tamil Nadu Wakf Board. It may be relevant to administrators, beneficiaries, occupants or persons dealing with property belonging to that named Wakf. The notice does not provide survey numbers, boundaries or individual property descriptions.

Insolvency proceedings

The First Additional District Judge, Tirunelveli, published notices for I.P. No. 6/2010 and I.P. No. 1/2012, identified in part as No. VI-3(a)/133/2013. In each proceeding, the petitioner asked the court to adjudge him as insolvent. Both petitions were listed for hearing on 27 September 2013.

The notices identify the petitioners and respondents. They do not declare that either petitioner had already been adjudged insolvent.

Company winding-up petition

High Court notice No. VI-3(a)/134/2013 concerns C.P. No. 7 of 2013 against Universal Aviation Services Private Limited. The petition was presented by creditor A.M. Shanmuganaathan and was listed for hearing on 27 September 2013.

Creditors, contributories and others wishing to support or oppose the petition were directed to notify the petitioner or the petitioner’s advocates and appear at the hearing. Any opposing affidavit had to be filed in court, with a copy served on the petitioner or advocate, not less than five days before the hearing.

This summary is generated from the source document to help you find what is relevant. The PDF above is authoritative. For advice on your own property, use LandLens One or speak to a qualified professional.

Common questions

Does this Gazette issue change land ownership anywhere in Tamil Nadu?

No land ownership transfer is stated. The property related item only extends direct management of Madarasathul Sakiya Bi Balika Thaikka Wakf up to 7 July 2014.

Does the Wakf notice identify the affected land by survey number?

No. The notice names Madarasathul Sakiya Bi Balika Thaikka Wakf and Dindigul District, but gives no survey numbers, boundaries or individual property descriptions.

Were the insolvency petitioners declared insolvent by these notices?

No. The notices state that the petitioners applied to be adjudged insolvent and that the petitions were posted for hearing on 27 September 2013.

Who could participate in the Universal Aviation Services Private Limited winding-up hearing?

Any creditor, contributory or other person wishing to support or oppose the petition could give notice to the petitioner or the petitioner’s advocates and appear at the hearing in person or through an advocate.