Tamil Nadu Government Gazette, No. 48, Part VI, Section 3(a), 21 December 2011
The Government of Tamil Nadu, through the Director of Stationery and Printing, published Tamil Nadu Government Gazette No. 48, Part VI, Section 3(a), dated 21 December 2011. Notifications No. VI-3(a)/165/2011, VI-3(a)/166/2011 and VI-3(a)/167/2011 give notice of a company winding-up petition before the High Court of Judicature at Madras and two insolvency proceedings before the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Pudukkottai. The gazette does not introduce or change any land or property rule.
What the gazette contains
Tamil Nadu Government Gazette No. 48, Part VI, Section 3(a), dated 21 December 2011, contains judicial notifications published by the Government of Tamil Nadu through the Director of Stationery and Printing. It records one company winding-up petition and two personal insolvency proceedings.
The publication is relevant mainly to the named companies, debtors, creditors, respondents and other people entitled to participate in those court proceedings. It does not announce a land acquisition, planning change, property registration requirement or other land-related measure.
Company winding-up petition
Notification No. VI-3(a)/165/2011 concerns Company Petition No. 183 of 2009 before the High Court of Judicature at Madras.
- Scantrans India Private Limited, represented by its Manager Finance, V.S. Swaminathan, is the petitioner and creditor.
- Medtech Products Limited is the respondent.
- The petition seeks the winding up of Medtech Products Limited under the Companies Act, 1956.
- The petition was presented on 20 July 2009 and was directed to be heard on 8 December 2011.
- A creditor, contributory or other person wishing to support or oppose the petition was required to notify the petitioner or the petitioner’s advocate and appear at the hearing.
- The notice states that an opposing affidavit had to be filed in court and served on the petitioner or advocate not less than five days before the hearing.
Pudukkottai insolvency proceedings
Notification No. VI-3(a)/166/2011 concerns Insolvency Petition No. 4 of 2008 before the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Pudukkottai.
- Rani, wife of Rajagopal, is the debtor and petitioner.
- Kannan, son of Kalimuthu, is the creditor and respondent.
- Rani applied under Section 10 of the Provincial Insolvency Act to be adjudged insolvent.
- The case was posted to 20 January 2012.
Notification No. VI-3(a)/167/2011 concerns Insolvency Petition No. 4 of 2010 before the same court.
- S. Beer Mohamed, also identified as Shettu, is the petitioner and debtor.
- The notification lists multiple respondents and creditors from locations in Pudukkottai District.
- The petitioners and debtors applied under Section 10 of the I.P. Act of 1920 to be adjudged insolvent.
- The case was posted to 24 January 2012.
This summary is generated from the source document to help you find what is relevant. The PDF above is authoritative. For advice on your own property, use LandLens One or speak to a qualified professional.
Common questions
Does this gazette change any Tamil Nadu land or property rule?
No. Tamil Nadu Government Gazette No. 48, Part VI, Section 3(a), dated 21 December 2011, publishes judicial notices about a company winding-up petition and insolvency cases, not land or property rules.
Who may be affected by the Medtech Products Limited notice?
The notice directly concerns Medtech Products Limited, Scantrans India Private Limited, and any creditor, contributory or other person wishing to support or oppose the winding-up petition.
What insolvency cases are listed for Pudukkottai?
Notification No. VI-3(a)/166/2011 concerns Rani’s insolvency petition, posted to 20 January 2012. Notification No. VI-3(a)/167/2011 concerns the petition involving S. Beer Mohamed, also identified as Shettu, posted to 24 January 2012.
Does publication of these notices mean the debtors were declared insolvent?
The source only says that petitions were filed to have the debtors adjudged insolvent and gives the dates to which the cases were posted. It does not state that an insolvency declaration was made.
