Civil Revision Petition No. 2140 of 1978
The High Court of Judicature at Madras, in Civil Revision Petition Number 2140 of 1978 decided by Justice Paul on 3 November 1978, dismissed a petition challenging the land ceiling applied to Konda Reddiar Annadhana Trust. The Court upheld the findings that the trust was secular and charitable, could hold only five standard acres under Section 5(d) of Tamil Nadu Act 58 of 1961 as amended by Act 37 of 1972, and held 9.90 acres as surplus.
What the decision covers
Civil Revision Petition Number 2140 of 1978 concerns the land ceiling applicable to Konda Reddiar Annadhana Trust. The High Court of Judicature at Madras delivered the decision through Justice Paul on 3 November 1978 and refused to admit the revision petition.
The petition challenged an order of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Cuddalore, acting as the Land Tribunal. The Land Tribunal had confirmed the decision of the Authorised Officer (Land Reforms), Cuddalore.
Findings about the trust and its land
Konda Reddiar Annadhana Trust was created by a trust deed in 1959 and held 14.90 acres of land. The Authorised Officer initiated proceedings under Tamil Nadu Act 58 of 1961 as amended by Act 37 of 1972.
The principal findings were:
- The trust was a public trust of a charitable nature.
- The trust could hold only five standard acres under Section 5(d) of the Act.
- The trust was holding a surplus extent of 9.90 acres.
- The trust was secular and charitable, rather than religious.
Why the trust was treated as secular
The Land Tribunal examined clause 7 of the 1959 trust deed. It required the Managing Trustee to provide 130 bags of paddy each year to the executive officer of the Dharmasalai. The executive officer was to cook rice at midday and at night and feed 48 persons.
The Land Tribunal found that the purpose was to feed poor persons. The trust deed did not limit the benefit to Hindus or members of any particular sector or community. It also contained nothing showing that the trust had a religious object. Justice Paul agreed fully with that assessment.
Who may be affected
The decision is relevant to trustees, landowners and professionals dealing with agricultural land held by charitable trusts under the Land Ceiling Act. It shows that the terms of the trust deed and the actual stated objects were central to deciding whether a trust was religious or purely secular and charitable.
The High Court found no ground to admit the revision petition. It therefore dismissed the petition and left the orders of the Authorised Officer and Land Tribunal unchanged.
This summary is generated from the source document to help you find what is relevant. The PDF above is authoritative. For advice on your own property, use LandLens One or speak to a qualified professional.
Common questions
How much land was Konda Reddiar Annadhana Trust allowed to hold?
The Court upheld the finding that the trust could hold only five standard acres under Section 5(d) of Tamil Nadu Act 58 of 1961 as amended by Act 37 of 1972.
How much of the trust's land was declared surplus?
The Authorised Officer found that the trust held 14.90 acres and declared 9.90 acres as surplus. The Land Tribunal and the High Court upheld that finding.
Why was the trust not treated as religious?
The trust deed provided for feeding poor persons and did not restrict the benefit to Hindus or any particular sector or community. The Land Tribunal and the High Court found no religious object in the trust deed.
Did the High Court admit the revision petition?
No. The High Court of Judicature at Madras found no grounds for admission and dismissed the revision petition.
