Official guidance, Tamil Nadu land law
Concurrence for Buildings of Educational Institutions under G.O. 76, Housing and Urban Development Department, Dated 14.06.2018
Issued under G.O. 76 of the Housing and Urban Development Department, dated 14 June 2018, this official record lists concurrence decisions for educational institution buildings in Kanyakumari district. It identifies each school application as either granted concurrence or rejected, and often gives the decision letter and reason for rejection.
What the record covers
The Housing and Urban Development Department record under G.O. 76, dated 14 June 2018, reports decisions on building concurrence applications from educational institutions in Kanyakumari district. The table provides school names, online application details, application dates where shown, and the letter used to communicate each decision.
The record affects the educational institutions named in the table and may also be relevant to owners, buyers or professionals checking the planning history of a listed school property. It does not provide general approval for every educational building in the district.
Decisions recorded
The Kanyakumari district list includes both concurrence and rejection decisions. Examples of institutions for which concurrence was issued include:
- St. Michael Matric Higher Secondary School.
- St. Theresa Nursery and Primary School.
- Rose of Sharon Matriculation School.
- ABC Matric Higher Secondary School.
- St. Annes Matriculation School.
- SMR National School.
- Don Bosco Matric Higher Secondary School.
- Sacred Heart Matric Higher Secondary School.
- Christuraja Matric Higher Secondary School.
- NVKS Senior Secondary School.
Each entry should be matched with its listed letter number and date when checking a particular property or application.
Reasons for rejection
The record gives several reasons for rejecting applications:
- The building falls in a HACA area.
- The building falls in a planning area.
- The building falls in both a HACA area and a planning area.
- Documents required under G.O. 76 of the Housing and Urban Development Department, dated 14 June 2018, were not produced.
- The applicant withdrew the application.
Examples rejected because the building falls in a HACA area include Sree Krishna Vidya Bharathi Nursery and Primary School, BR Memorial Matriculation School, St. Mary’s CBSE School and Little Flower Central School. Several other applications were rejected through Letter Roc. No. 19116/2022/Tcp6, dated 16 September 2022, because required documents were not produced.
Relevance to property checks
A buyer or professional examining a listed school property can use the record to identify the reported concurrence outcome and corresponding decision letter. The record should not be read as confirming ownership, title or approval beyond the concurrence decision stated for the individual application.
This summary is generated from the source document to help you find what is relevant. The PDF above is authoritative. For advice on your own property, use LandLens One or speak to a qualified professional.
Common questions
Does every school in the Kanyakumari district list have building concurrence?
No. The record contains both concurrence and rejection decisions for individual educational institutions.
Why were many school building applications rejected?
The stated reasons include location in a HACA area or planning area, failure to produce documents required under G.O. 76, and withdrawal of the application.
Was concurrence issued for Don Bosco Matric Higher Secondary School?
Yes. The record says concurrence was issued through Letter Roc. No. 583/2020 kkd, dated 21 September 2021.
Does a rejection in this record prove that the school does not own the land?
No. The record reports building concurrence decisions and their stated reasons. It does not provide findings about land ownership or title.
