Official guidance, Tamil Nadu land law
Report on building of Educational Institutions (Schools) for issue of concurrence under G.O. (Ms.) No. 76, Housing and Urban Development Department, dated 14.06.2018
This official report records the concurrence status of 22 educational institution applications under G.O. (Ms.) No. 76, issued by the Housing and Urban Development Department on 14 June 2018. Nine applications received concurrence and 13 were rejected, mainly because required documents were not produced. The report does not identify its own issuing office.
What the report covers
The report records decisions on applications concerning buildings of educational institutions and schools under G.O. (Ms.) No. 76, issued by the Housing and Urban Development Department on 14 June 2018. It provides the institution name, online application number, application date and status.
The report covers 22 institutions. It is a status list rather than a general approval for all educational buildings.
Application outcomes
The listed outcomes are:
- Nine applications received concurrence.
- Thirteen applications were rejected.
- Twelve rejections state that documents required under G.O. (Ms.) No. 76 were not produced.
- Wisdom Nursery and Primary School was rejected because a hard copy had not been submitted.
Institutions shown as having received concurrence include St. Joseph Nursery and Primary School, St. Mary's Matriculation Higher Secondary School, Annai Paruvathamma Matriculation Higher Secondary School, St. Mary's Nursery and Primary School, St. Pauls Matriculation Higher Secondary School, Shanthi Nikethan Matriculation Higher Secondary School, Golden Gates Matriculation Higher Secondary School, Sree Ambal Matriculation Higher Secondary School and St. Andrews Matriculation Higher Secondary School.
The report gives a proceeding or record reference for each concurrence or rejection. The decisions recorded in the list range from 25 March 2021 to 16 September 2022.
Who may be affected
The report is relevant to owners, operators or advisers connected with one of the 22 named educational institutions. A person reviewing a school building should match the institution name and online application number with the status and proceeding reference shown in the report.
A concurrence entry confirms only that the listed application received concurrence. A rejection entry means the listed application did not receive concurrence in the reported decision. Where rejection was caused by missing documents or a missing hard copy, the report does not state that the deficiency was later corrected.
Limits of the information
The report does not provide property addresses, survey numbers, site boundaries or planning approval details. A property buyer cannot use the institution name alone to confirm that a particular parcel is covered. The report also does not state that concurrence replaces any other approval.
This summary is generated from the source document to help you find what is relevant. The PDF above is authoritative. For advice on your own property, use LandLens One or speak to a qualified professional.
Common questions
Does the report grant concurrence to every school listed?
No. Nine of the 22 applications received concurrence and 13 were rejected.
Why were most of the applications rejected?
Twelve applications were rejected for non-production of documents required under G.O. (Ms.) No. 76, issued by the Housing and Urban Development Department on 14 June 2018. Wisdom Nursery and Primary School was rejected because a hard copy had not been submitted.
Can I identify the affected property from this report?
Not from the report alone. It gives institution names, online application numbers, application dates and decision references, but no addresses, survey numbers or site boundaries.
Is St. Joseph Nursery and Primary School shown as having concurrence?
Yes. The report records concurrence through Roc. No. 1268/2022/TCP-2, dated 26 February 2022.
