Official guidance, Tamil Nadu land law
Regularization of buildings of Educational Institutions under G.O.76
The Housing and Urban Development Department's Madurai District status list records decisions on educational institution building regularization applications under Government Order 76, dated 14 June 2018. It identifies 35 application entries as receiving concurrence, being rejected or repeating another entry, and gives proceeding or letter details for the decisions.
What the document covers
The Housing and Urban Development Department's Madurai District list covers online applications for regularization of buildings belonging to educational institutions under Government Order 76, dated 14 June 2018. The list provides the institution name, online application number, application date and outcome.
The document contains 35 entries. Some entries concern the same institution or repeat an earlier entry, so the number of entries should not be treated as the number of separate properties or institutions.
Recorded outcomes
The Madurai District list records:
- Eight entries where concurrence was given.
- Twenty five entries that were rejected.
- Two RMG Nursery and Primary School entries marked as repeated in entry 3.
Concurrence is recorded for entries involving RMG Nursery and Primary School, Sri Vignesh Nursery and Primary School, Mahatma Nursery and Primary School, Sri Narayanaguru Vidyasala Nursery and Primary School, Thaai Nursery and Primary School, Sri Sundareswara Vidya Sala Matriculation Higher Secondary School and Parimalam Educational Trust. Mahatma Nursery and Primary School appears twice with separate proceeding numbers.
Reasons recorded for rejection
The Housing and Urban Development Department list gives several rejection descriptions:
- Eleven entries state that the hard copy was not submitted.
- Six entries state that the applicant did not produce documents stipulated in Government Order 76.
- Seven entries refer to a rejection letter and identify the matter as being in a planning area.
- One further rejection for Saravanas Vidhya Mandhir Matriculation School cites a letter but does not state a reason in the list.
Proceeding or letter numbers and decision dates are provided for most outcomes. The recorded date for the Parimalam Educational Trust proceeding is incomplete in the source.
Who should check the list
Educational institution owners, property buyers and professionals dealing with any listed premises should match the institution name with its online application number. The list establishes only the recorded application outcome. It does not provide property descriptions, survey numbers, approval conditions or an explanation of the wider legal effect of concurrence or rejection.
This summary is generated from the source document to help you find what is relevant. The PDF above is authoritative. For advice on your own property, use LandLens One or speak to a qualified professional.
Common questions
Does every institution in the list have regularization concurrence?
No. Eight entries record concurrence, twenty five record rejection and two are marked as repeats of entry 3.
Why were some applications rejected?
The stated reasons include failure to submit a hard copy and failure to produce documents stipulated in Government Order 76. Several other entries are identified as planning area rejections.
How can I identify the relevant application for an institution?
Use the institution name together with the online application number. This is important because some institutions appear more than once and two entries are marked as repeats.
Does a concurrence entry prove that every building approval requirement was completed?
The document only records that concurrence was given for the identified application. It does not state approval conditions or explain any further legal effect.
