official guidance

Circular No.52666/C1/2018, Cancellation of Settlement Deed

The Office of the Inspector General of Registration, Chennai, issued Circular No.52666/C1/2018 on 29 November 2018 to explain the legal position on registering deeds that unilaterally cancel settlement deeds. It records Madras High Court rulings that a settlor generally cannot cancel a completed settlement deed alone and that disputed revocation must be decided by a civil court.

Category
Registration and stamp duty
Effective
29 November 2018
Pages
11
Status
In force
Open the source document The official copy, as published. Opens in a new tab.
Source document Preview loads as you scroll

What the circular covers

Circular No.52666/C1/2018 of the Office of the Inspector General of Registration, Chennai, concerns cancellation deeds executed by a settlor without the participation of the settlee. It notes that cancellation documents are generally executed by everyone who executed the principal document, although a principal may unilaterally cancel a power of attorney.

Settlement deeds are commonly signed only by the settlor. The circular explains that this practice had led to a presumption that the settlor could also register a cancellation alone, but the Madras High Court decisions reproduced in the circular reject that position in the circumstances considered.

Key legal position recorded

The Office of the Inspector General of Registration relies on several Madras High Court decisions concerning unilateral cancellation of settlement deeds. The main points recorded are:

  • Once a settlement deed has taken effect and transferred rights to the settlee, the settlor cannot unilaterally take those rights back through a registered cancellation deed.
  • An unconditional and irrevocable settlement deed cannot be cancelled merely by presenting a cancellation deed to the Sub-Registrar.
  • Allegations such as fraud, misrepresentation, undue influence or coercion must be decided by a civil court.
  • A registering officer is not competent to decide disputed facts or determine whether a claimed exception permitting revocation applies.
  • In one case, the High Court directed removal of the cancellation entry from the register and held that a later settlement based on that cancellation was null and void.
  • The High Court also quashed unilateral cancellations in several other cases listed in the circular.

When revocation may arise

Circular No.52666/C1/2018 reproduces section 126 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. It states that a donor and donee may agree that a gift will be suspended or revoked upon a specified event that does not depend on the donor's will. An agreement making a gift revocable merely at the donor's will is void, and except for the stated circumstances, a gift cannot be revoked.

Who may be affected

Circular No.52666/C1/2018 is relevant to settlors, settlees, registering officers and anyone claiming property through a cancellation or later transaction. A person relying on a title created after unilateral cancellation may be affected if a court removes the cancellation entry and invalidates the later transaction.

This summary is generated from the source document to help you find what is relevant. The PDF above is authoritative. For advice on your own property, use LandLens One or speak to a qualified professional.

Common questions

Can a settlor cancel a registered settlement deed without the settlee signing?

The Madras High Court rulings recorded in Circular No.52666/C1/2018 say that a settlor cannot unilaterally cancel a settlement deed after it has taken effect and transferred rights to the settlee.

What should a settlor do if the settlement deed was obtained by fraud or coercion?

The circular records that questions involving fraud, misrepresentation, undue influence or coercion must be taken to a civil court. A registering officer cannot decide those disputed facts.

Can a Sub-Registrar decide whether a settlement deed falls within an exception allowing revocation?

No. The circular quotes the Madras High Court as holding that this is a matter of evidence for a civil court, not a decision for the registering officer.

What can happen to a later property transfer based on unilateral cancellation?

The circular cites a case in which the High Court ordered removal of the cancellation entry and declared a later settlement made on the basis of that cancellation null and void.