G.O.(Ms) No.61, District Rural Development Agency Administrative Fund, 2018
The Rural Development and Panchayat Raj (CGS.II) Department of the Government of Tamil Nadu issued G.O.(Ms) No.61, dated 25 April 2018, sanctioning Rs.9,68,333 as the second instalment of the District Rural Development Agency Administrative Fund for Dindigul District for the financial year 2017-18. It is an administrative funding sanction, and the document contains no provisions concerning land ownership, registration, classification or development.
Purpose
The Rural Development and Panchayat Raj (CGS.II) Department issued G.O.(Ms) No.61 to sanction and release administrative funding to the District Rural Development Agency, Dindigul District. The sanction relates to the second instalment of the District Rural Development Agency Administrative Fund for the financial year 2017-18.
The document concerns government programme administration. It does not introduce any requirement affecting property buyers, landowners, developers or land transactions.
Background
The Government of India had released the second instalment of its central share for the administration fund of District Rural Development Agencies. A sum of Rs.5.81 lakh had been deducted in connection with a vehicle purchased by the District Rural Development Agency, Dindigul District, during 2016-17.
The Director of Rural Development and Panchayat Raj asked the Government of India to restore the deducted amount because the vehicle had been purchased in place of a condemned vehicle under an earlier state government approval. The Government of India subsequently sanctioned restoration of Rs.5.81 lakh.
Key provisions
G.O.(Ms) No.61 provides that:
- Rs.9,68,333 is sanctioned to the District Rural Development Agency, Dindigul District.
- The amount consists of a central share of Rs.5,81,000, identified as 60 per cent, and a state share of Rs.3,87,333, identified as 40 per cent.
- The money is for the second instalment of the agency's administrative fund for the financial year 2017-18.
- The Director of Rural Development and Panchayat Raj is authorised to draw and disburse the sanctioned amount to the District Rural Development Agency, Dindigul District.
- The expenditure is assigned to the stated account head for District Rural Development Agency administration costs and grants for specific schemes.
- The Finance Department concurred with the sanction on 23 April 2018.
The amount written in figures is Rs.9,68,333. The accompanying amount in words in paragraphs 2 and 3 does not match that figure, although the listed central and state shares add up to Rs.9,68,333.
Relevance to land and property
G.O.(Ms) No.61 does not change land records, title, patta, land use, planning controls or registration procedures. Its direct administrative recipients are the Director of Rural Development and Panchayat Raj and the District Rural Development Agency, Dindigul District.
This summary is generated from the source document to help you find what is relevant. The PDF above is authoritative. For advice on your own property, use LandLens One or speak to a qualified professional.
Common questions
Does G.O.(Ms) No.61 affect my patta or land ownership in Dindigul?
No land ownership or patta provision appears in the document. It only sanctions administrative funding for the District Rural Development Agency, Dindigul District.
How much money was sanctioned for the Dindigul District Rural Development Agency?
The amount shown in figures is Rs.9,68,333, comprising a central share of Rs.5,81,000 and a state share of Rs.3,87,333. The amount written in words in the document does not match the figure.
Who can draw and release the sanctioned amount?
The Director of Rural Development and Panchayat Raj is authorised to draw and disburse the amount to the District Rural Development Agency, Dindigul District.
Why was the central share restored?
The Government of India had deducted Rs.5.81 lakh in connection with a vehicle purchase. The amount was restored after the state explained that the vehicle had replaced a condemned vehicle for which state government orders had been issued.
