official guidance

G.O. (Ms.) No. 80, TN-IAMWARM Project, Formation of Committee for Review of Additional Schemes, 2013

The Public Works (WR1) Department issued G.O. (Ms.) No. 80 dated 30 May 2013 to form a committee for the technical review and realistic assessment of additional schemes proposed under the TN-IAMWARM Project. The committee must inspect sites, assess whether proposals are necessary, refine their technical details and submit costed, package-wise recommendations with approved drawings for further processing with the World Bank.

Category
Revenue and land administration
Effective
1 January 2013
Pages
11
Status
In force
Open the source document The official copy, as published. Opens in a new tab.
Source document Preview loads as you scroll

What the document does

G.O. (Ms.) No. 80 dated 30 May 2013 of the Public Works (WR1) Department establishes a committee to review additional schemes proposed under the TN-IAMWARM Project. The proposals, amounting to Rs.290 crores and intended to use project savings, had been placed before a World Bank consultant.

The committee provides technical assessment and recommendations. The proposals must still be sent by the Engineer in Chief, Water Resources Department for further processing with the World Bank.

Schemes covered

The TN-IAMWARM Project proposals reviewed under G.O. (Ms.) No. 80 include:

  • Construction of check dams across rivers.
  • Construction of open recharge bed wells.
  • Rehabilitation and modernisation of canals in IAMWARM sub-basins.
  • Lining of two main canals, one in the Lower Bhavani Sub-basin and another in the Mettur area of the Cauvery Basin.
  • Rehabilitation of remaining tanks and anicuts, including replacement of existing shutters.
  • Rehabilitation of culverts and supply channels.
  • Construction of flood protection works.
  • Reconstruction of some weirs.

Committee membership

The committee formed by the Public Works (WR1) Department consists of:

  • Director, SWaRMA, Chairman.
  • Engineer in Chief, Water Resources Department, member.
  • Chief Engineer, Design Research Construction Support, member.
  • Chief Engineer, Plan Formulation, member.
  • Regional Chief Engineer concerned, member.
  • Superintending Engineer, Procurement, IAMWARM, member.

Review requirements

The committee established under G.O. (Ms.) No. 80 must:

  • Critically examine every proposal, including whether it is necessary.
  • Address observations made by the World Bank mission.
  • Consider site-specific conditions through field checks and site verification.
  • Use design inputs authenticated by the Chief Engineer, Design Research Construction Support.
  • Develop realistic technical proposals.
  • Prepare appropriately costed, package-wise recommendations supported by approved drawings.

Relevance to property owners and buyers

G.O. (Ms.) No. 80 does not identify individual properties, landowners or survey numbers. It creates a technical review process for proposed water resources works. A buyer or owner near an IAMWARM sub-basin, river, canal, tank, anicut, culvert or supply channel may wish to check whether a reviewed scheme later proceeds, but the document itself records only the committee and its assessment duties.

This summary is generated from the source document to help you find what is relevant. The PDF above is authoritative. For advice on your own property, use LandLens One or speak to a qualified professional.

Common questions

Does G.O. (Ms.) No. 80 approve construction of the proposed works?

No final construction approval is stated. The committee must submit costed, package-wise recommendations with approved drawings to the Engineer in Chief, Water Resources Department for further processing with the World Bank.

Does the document identify any private land or survey number?

No. The document does not list individual properties, landowners or survey numbers.

What kinds of water resources works will the committee review?

The proposals include check dams, recharge bed wells, canal works, tank and anicut rehabilitation, shutter replacement, culvert and supply channel rehabilitation, flood protection works and reconstruction of some weirs.

Will committee members inspect the proposed work sites?

Yes. The committee must consider site-specific conditions through field checks and critically examine the proposals through site verification.